28.01.2016 Views

THE FUTURE OF THE ARMY

Futurearmy

Futurearmy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

APPENDIX B:<br />

RECOMMENDATIONS BY RESPONSIBLE <strong>OF</strong>FICIAL<br />

Recommendation 53: The Secretary of the Army should<br />

perform a top-to-bottom review in fiscal year 2017 of the<br />

Individual Ready Reserve program to ensure compliance with<br />

existing statutes.<br />

Recommendation 56: The Secretary of the Army should<br />

rescind the February 22, 2006, memo Individual Ready Reserve<br />

Transformation.<br />

Recommendation 57: Congress, the Department of Defense,<br />

and the Army should implement the Commission’s plan<br />

(Option Three) for distribution of the Apache fleet. The<br />

Commission’s plan maintains twenty-four manned Apache<br />

battalions including twenty in the Regular Army equipped<br />

with twenty-four aircraft each and four in the Army National<br />

Guard equipped with eighteen aircraft each. The plan adds only<br />

two Black Hawk battalions to the Army National Guard. The<br />

Army should commit to using the four Army National Guard<br />

Apache battalions regularly, mobilizing and deploying them in<br />

peacetime and war.<br />

Recommendation 58: The Army should maintain a forwardstationed<br />

Combat Aviation Brigade in Korea.<br />

Recommendation 59: The Army should consider increasing<br />

flying hours available for peacetime training.<br />

Recommendation 60: The Army should implement a more<br />

aggressive modernization program for its aviation forces.<br />

Recommendation 61: The Secretary of the Army should<br />

codify the delegation of authority from the Chief, National<br />

Guard Bureau to the Director, Army National Guard in Army<br />

regulations for force structure allocation among the states,<br />

territories, and the District of Columbia.<br />

Recommendation 62: The Secretary of the Army should<br />

codify in Army regulations the existing Army National Guard<br />

Force Program Review process as the formal way to manage<br />

change in the Army National Guard.<br />

Recommendation 63: The Army should add representatives<br />

from the Army Secretariat and Army Staff to the Army<br />

National Guard Force Program Review working groups and<br />

boards as observers.<br />

<strong>ARMY</strong> SERVICE COMPONENT COMMANDS<br />

Recommendation 10: The Army must assist Combatant<br />

Commands and Army Service Component Commands with<br />

timely integration of force structure changes into their strategic<br />

planning process.<br />

Recommendation 11: Combatant Commands and Army<br />

Service Component Commands must update all war plans<br />

with current and programmed force structure and doctrine and<br />

establish a process to ensure routine war plan and Time Phased<br />

Force Deployment Data updates at a minimum of once every<br />

two years.<br />

Recommendation 19: The Army should ensure Combatant<br />

Commands (COCOM) and Army Service Component<br />

Commands (ASCC) have the ability to provide operational<br />

mission command in proportion to the unique mission for each<br />

COCOM. The Army should consult closely with COCOM<br />

and ASCC commanders to assess the risks entailed in mission<br />

command changes and seek to minimize risk where possible<br />

when implementing them.<br />

National Commission on the Future of the Army 117

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!