15.02.2016 Views

Architectural Record 2015-04

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Opening<br />

New Doors!<br />

SDH1 is a luxurious, space-saving alternative to<br />

traditional hinged door hardware. Create new space<br />

previously used by the hinged door swing radius.<br />

Or just give your space a decorative, rustic feel.<br />

Offers an exquisite feeling of panache!<br />

Made of top quality Satin Stainless Steel, rail bar is<br />

78 3 /4" long, for use with openings 30" to 44".<br />

Can hold doors up to 150 pounds.<br />

All mounting hardware is included. For a video,<br />

please visit mockett.com/sdh1<br />

“Fine<br />

Arc itectural<br />

ardware<br />

YourFine<br />

Furniture” ®<br />

for<br />

h<br />

perspectivebooks<br />

MAS: The Modern Architecture<br />

Symposia 1962–1966: A Critical<br />

Edition, edited by Rosemarie Haag<br />

Bletter and Joan Ockman, with Nancy<br />

Eklund Later. Yale University Press,<br />

February <strong>2015</strong>, 348 pages, $80.<br />

Reviewed by Suzanne Stephens<br />

thirty years after the legendary<br />

show Modern Architecture:<br />

An International Exhibition at the<br />

Museum of Modern Art (MoMA),<br />

its curators, Henry-Russell<br />

Hitchcock and Philip Johnson,<br />

launched a series of symposia<br />

assessing the development of this<br />

new architecture. Whereas the<br />

MoMA show was accompanied by<br />

a book, the symposia had<br />

to wait almost 50 years<br />

for the proceedings to be<br />

published. It is like opening<br />

a time capsule—and a<br />

compelling one.<br />

The three Modern<br />

Architecture Symposia<br />

(MAS) took place at<br />

Columbia University in<br />

May 1962, 1964, and 1966,<br />

and were organized by<br />

Columbia historian<br />

George Collins and the<br />

director of Avery Library, Adolf<br />

Placzek. They brought together a<br />

formidable ensemble of scholars<br />

and critics from a range of institutions<br />

to examine three decades<br />

(not in strict order): the first, 1918<br />

to 1928; the second, 1929 to 1939;<br />

and finally the third, 1907 to 1917.<br />

Since the symposia took place,<br />

they have been called a convocation<br />

of the gods of architectural<br />

history and criticism—Rudolf<br />

Wittkower, Vincent Scully, Colin<br />

Rowe, Sibyl Moholy-Nagy, James<br />

Marston Fitch, Catherine Bauer<br />

Wurster, Edgar Kaufmann Jr.,<br />

William Jordy, Eduard Sekler,<br />

Alfred Barr, and others, including,<br />

of course, Hitchcock and Johnson.<br />

Even young historians-in-waiting,<br />

Robert A.M. Stern and Christian<br />

Otto, gave presentations. But few<br />

were privy to the details except<br />

for invited architects, curators,<br />

critics, and stu dents. (This writer,<br />

newly on the editorial staff at<br />

Progressive Architecture, cajoled her<br />

way into the 1966 meeting.) So it<br />

has been a question: was it as<br />

significant as the roster of participants<br />

makes it sound? This book<br />

shows the answer is a resounding<br />

yes. Illuminating essays by editors<br />

Rosemarie Haag Bletter (who<br />

attended two sessions as a graduate<br />

student) and Joan Ockman<br />

(a former director of Columbia’s<br />

Temple Hoyne Buell Center for the<br />

Study of American Architecture)<br />

add to its heft.<br />

Don’t expect, though, a<br />

“Wasn’t it swell?” nostalgic recap<br />

of the International Style. The<br />

book provides testimony to a<br />

many-sided debate: Maholy-Nagy,<br />

outspoken critic and professor at<br />

Pratt, blamed Gropius and Breuer<br />

for the “slow death<br />

of architecture<br />

and urbanism”<br />

in the U.S. in the<br />

1930s. Elizabeth<br />

Mock Kassler, the<br />

director of MoMA’s<br />

department of<br />

architecture from<br />

1942 to 1946,<br />

argued that the<br />

International Style<br />

resulted in “no<br />

buildings of<br />

intrinsic value in this country.”<br />

Bletter provides an account of<br />

the considerations determining<br />

the scope of each symposium,<br />

with footnotes revealing often<br />

amusing backstories. The first<br />

one discussed functionalism and<br />

expressionism; the second, regional<br />

and national aspects of this<br />

new architecture. The third session<br />

analyzed the influences of<br />

such movements as De Stijl and<br />

Deutscher Werkbund.<br />

Ockman puts this period of<br />

architecture within the larger<br />

context of intellectual history,<br />

including architecture’s turn to<br />

theory. The MAS provide a synoptic<br />

history of those years: candid<br />

comments show the give-and-take<br />

as the gods growled at each other<br />

and debated the mythical status<br />

of modernism—as a style, an<br />

urbanistic solution, and a social<br />

concern. One wishes for more<br />

illustrations of the buildings, but<br />

this is a fascinating immersion<br />

in the MAS mysteries. ■<br />

www.mockett.com Ü 800-523-1269<br />

CIRCLE 41

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!