Architectural Record 2015-04
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Opening<br />
New Doors!<br />
SDH1 is a luxurious, space-saving alternative to<br />
traditional hinged door hardware. Create new space<br />
previously used by the hinged door swing radius.<br />
Or just give your space a decorative, rustic feel.<br />
Offers an exquisite feeling of panache!<br />
Made of top quality Satin Stainless Steel, rail bar is<br />
78 3 /4" long, for use with openings 30" to 44".<br />
Can hold doors up to 150 pounds.<br />
All mounting hardware is included. For a video,<br />
please visit mockett.com/sdh1<br />
“Fine<br />
Arc itectural<br />
ardware<br />
YourFine<br />
Furniture” ®<br />
for<br />
h<br />
perspectivebooks<br />
MAS: The Modern Architecture<br />
Symposia 1962–1966: A Critical<br />
Edition, edited by Rosemarie Haag<br />
Bletter and Joan Ockman, with Nancy<br />
Eklund Later. Yale University Press,<br />
February <strong>2015</strong>, 348 pages, $80.<br />
Reviewed by Suzanne Stephens<br />
thirty years after the legendary<br />
show Modern Architecture:<br />
An International Exhibition at the<br />
Museum of Modern Art (MoMA),<br />
its curators, Henry-Russell<br />
Hitchcock and Philip Johnson,<br />
launched a series of symposia<br />
assessing the development of this<br />
new architecture. Whereas the<br />
MoMA show was accompanied by<br />
a book, the symposia had<br />
to wait almost 50 years<br />
for the proceedings to be<br />
published. It is like opening<br />
a time capsule—and a<br />
compelling one.<br />
The three Modern<br />
Architecture Symposia<br />
(MAS) took place at<br />
Columbia University in<br />
May 1962, 1964, and 1966,<br />
and were organized by<br />
Columbia historian<br />
George Collins and the<br />
director of Avery Library, Adolf<br />
Placzek. They brought together a<br />
formidable ensemble of scholars<br />
and critics from a range of institutions<br />
to examine three decades<br />
(not in strict order): the first, 1918<br />
to 1928; the second, 1929 to 1939;<br />
and finally the third, 1907 to 1917.<br />
Since the symposia took place,<br />
they have been called a convocation<br />
of the gods of architectural<br />
history and criticism—Rudolf<br />
Wittkower, Vincent Scully, Colin<br />
Rowe, Sibyl Moholy-Nagy, James<br />
Marston Fitch, Catherine Bauer<br />
Wurster, Edgar Kaufmann Jr.,<br />
William Jordy, Eduard Sekler,<br />
Alfred Barr, and others, including,<br />
of course, Hitchcock and Johnson.<br />
Even young historians-in-waiting,<br />
Robert A.M. Stern and Christian<br />
Otto, gave presentations. But few<br />
were privy to the details except<br />
for invited architects, curators,<br />
critics, and stu dents. (This writer,<br />
newly on the editorial staff at<br />
Progressive Architecture, cajoled her<br />
way into the 1966 meeting.) So it<br />
has been a question: was it as<br />
significant as the roster of participants<br />
makes it sound? This book<br />
shows the answer is a resounding<br />
yes. Illuminating essays by editors<br />
Rosemarie Haag Bletter (who<br />
attended two sessions as a graduate<br />
student) and Joan Ockman<br />
(a former director of Columbia’s<br />
Temple Hoyne Buell Center for the<br />
Study of American Architecture)<br />
add to its heft.<br />
Don’t expect, though, a<br />
“Wasn’t it swell?” nostalgic recap<br />
of the International Style. The<br />
book provides testimony to a<br />
many-sided debate: Maholy-Nagy,<br />
outspoken critic and professor at<br />
Pratt, blamed Gropius and Breuer<br />
for the “slow death<br />
of architecture<br />
and urbanism”<br />
in the U.S. in the<br />
1930s. Elizabeth<br />
Mock Kassler, the<br />
director of MoMA’s<br />
department of<br />
architecture from<br />
1942 to 1946,<br />
argued that the<br />
International Style<br />
resulted in “no<br />
buildings of<br />
intrinsic value in this country.”<br />
Bletter provides an account of<br />
the considerations determining<br />
the scope of each symposium,<br />
with footnotes revealing often<br />
amusing backstories. The first<br />
one discussed functionalism and<br />
expressionism; the second, regional<br />
and national aspects of this<br />
new architecture. The third session<br />
analyzed the influences of<br />
such movements as De Stijl and<br />
Deutscher Werkbund.<br />
Ockman puts this period of<br />
architecture within the larger<br />
context of intellectual history,<br />
including architecture’s turn to<br />
theory. The MAS provide a synoptic<br />
history of those years: candid<br />
comments show the give-and-take<br />
as the gods growled at each other<br />
and debated the mythical status<br />
of modernism—as a style, an<br />
urbanistic solution, and a social<br />
concern. One wishes for more<br />
illustrations of the buildings, but<br />
this is a fascinating immersion<br />
in the MAS mysteries. ■<br />
www.mockett.com Ü 800-523-1269<br />
CIRCLE 41