Architectural Record 2015-04

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Opening New Doors! SDH1 is a luxurious, space-saving alternative to traditional hinged door hardware. Create new space previously used by the hinged door swing radius. Or just give your space a decorative, rustic feel. Offers an exquisite feeling of panache! Made of top quality Satin Stainless Steel, rail bar is 78 3 /4" long, for use with openings 30" to 44". Can hold doors up to 150 pounds. All mounting hardware is included. For a video, please visit mockett.com/sdh1 “Fine Arc itectural ardware YourFine Furniture” ® for h perspectivebooks MAS: The Modern Architecture Symposia 1962–1966: A Critical Edition, edited by Rosemarie Haag Bletter and Joan Ockman, with Nancy Eklund Later. Yale University Press, February <strong>2015</strong>, 348 pages, $80. Reviewed by Suzanne Stephens thirty years after the legendary show Modern Architecture: An International Exhibition at the Museum of Modern Art (MoMA), its curators, Henry-Russell Hitchcock and Philip Johnson, launched a series of symposia assessing the development of this new architecture. Whereas the MoMA show was accompanied by a book, the symposia had to wait almost 50 years for the proceedings to be published. It is like opening a time capsule—and a compelling one. The three Modern Architecture Symposia (MAS) took place at Columbia University in May 1962, 1964, and 1966, and were organized by Columbia historian George Collins and the director of Avery Library, Adolf Placzek. They brought together a formidable ensemble of scholars and critics from a range of institutions to examine three decades (not in strict order): the first, 1918 to 1928; the second, 1929 to 1939; and finally the third, 1907 to 1917. Since the symposia took place, they have been called a convocation of the gods of architectural history and criticism—Rudolf Wittkower, Vincent Scully, Colin Rowe, Sibyl Moholy-Nagy, James Marston Fitch, Catherine Bauer Wurster, Edgar Kaufmann Jr., William Jordy, Eduard Sekler, Alfred Barr, and others, including, of course, Hitchcock and Johnson. Even young historians-in-waiting, Robert A.M. Stern and Christian Otto, gave presentations. But few were privy to the details except for invited architects, curators, critics, and stu dents. (This writer, newly on the editorial staff at Progressive Architecture, cajoled her way into the 1966 meeting.) So it has been a question: was it as significant as the roster of participants makes it sound? This book shows the answer is a resounding yes. Illuminating essays by editors Rosemarie Haag Bletter (who attended two sessions as a graduate student) and Joan Ockman (a former director of Columbia’s Temple Hoyne Buell Center for the Study of American Architecture) add to its heft. Don’t expect, though, a “Wasn’t it swell?” nostalgic recap of the International Style. The book provides testimony to a many-sided debate: Maholy-Nagy, outspoken critic and professor at Pratt, blamed Gropius and Breuer for the “slow death of architecture and urbanism” in the U.S. in the 1930s. Elizabeth Mock Kassler, the director of MoMA’s department of architecture from 1942 to 1946, argued that the International Style resulted in “no buildings of intrinsic value in this country.” Bletter provides an account of the considerations determining the scope of each symposium, with footnotes revealing often amusing backstories. The first one discussed functionalism and expressionism; the second, regional and national aspects of this new architecture. The third session analyzed the influences of such movements as De Stijl and Deutscher Werkbund. Ockman puts this period of architecture within the larger context of intellectual history, including architecture’s turn to theory. The MAS provide a synoptic history of those years: candid comments show the give-and-take as the gods growled at each other and debated the mythical status of modernism—as a style, an urbanistic solution, and a social concern. One wishes for more illustrations of the buildings, but this is a fascinating immersion in the MAS mysteries. ■ www.mockett.com Ü 800-523-1269 CIRCLE 41
Advertisement Retrofit Solution for Soft-Story Buildings Thousands of San Francisco building owners are now required by law to seismically retrofi t multi-unit (at least fi ve) soft-story, wood-frame residential structures that have two or more stories over a “soft” or “weak” story. These buildings typically have parking or commercial space on the ground fl oor with two or more stories above. As a result, the first fl oor has far more open areas of the wall than it actually has sheathed areas, making it particularly vulnerable to collapse in an earthquake. That was the case in both the Loma Prieta and Northridge earthquakes, which is why cities in California, including Berkeley and Oakland, have recently passed similar legislation and many others, including Los Angeles, are now considering it. San Francisco’s ordinance affects buildings permitted for construction before January 1, 1978. One solution to strengthen such buildings is the Simpson Strong-Tie ® Strong Frame ® special moment frame. Its patented Yield-Link structural fuses are designed to bear the brunt of lateral forces during an earthquake, isolating damage within the frame and keeping the structural integrity of the beams and columns intact. Another key advantage of the Simpson Strong-Tie special moment frame is no fi eld welding is required, which eliminates the risk of fi re in San Francisco’s older wood-framed buildings.“Field welding is not a good thing, particularly in an existing building because the chance of fi re is just too great. A bolted solution is much safer.” The special moment frame has been recognized in the construction industry for its innovation. It was one of only 16 products selected to win a 2014 Parade of Products@PCBC award, given by the California Building Association. For more information about the Strong Frame special moment frame, visit the website at strongtie.com/strongframe. Watch a video about San Francisco’s retrofi t ordinance at strongtie.com/softstory. “The structural fuses connect the beams to the columns. These fuses are designed to stretch and yield when the beam twists against the column, rather than the beam itself, and because of this the beams can be designed without bracing. This allows the Strong Frame to become a part of the wood building and perform in the way it’s supposed to,” said Steve Pryor, S.E., International Director of Building Systems at Simpson Strong-Tie. “It’s also the only commercially-available frame that bolts together and has the type of ductile capacity that can work inside of a wood-frame building.” CIRCLE 55 Soft-story retrofi t using Strong Frame ® special moment frame ©<strong>2015</strong> Simpson Strong-Tie Company Inc.
Page 1 and 2: 04 2015 $9.95 A PUBLICATION OF DODG
Page 3: For the landmark Fulton Center tran
Page 6 and 7: DON’T MISS THE MOST INFLUENTIAL C
Page 8 and 9: Architect: Skidmore, Owings & Merri
Page 10 and 11: Designer: James Carpenter Design As
Page 12 and 13: corotechcoatings.com CIRCLE 67
Page 14 and 15: 12 ARCHITECTURAL RECORD APRIL 2015
Page 16 and 17: LEARN & EARN Earn your continuing e
Page 18 and 19: The Ce ntu ry - Los Ang eles, CA Ar
Page 20 and 21: HANDCAST BRONZE | rockymountainhard
Page 30 and 31: CIRCLE 38
Page 32 and 33: Pilkington OptiView anti-reflective
Page 34 and 35: BRICK - THE MATERIAL OF CHOICE FOR
Page 38 and 39: Long live your design tm P110-5 M G
Page 44 and 45: A STAND-OUT THAT FITS IN Slotnick R
Page 52 and 53: Solus >> Brushed Aluminum with Ligh
Page 54 and 55: THE NEW PPG PAINTS TM COMING SOON,
Page 60 and 61: CIRCLE 65
Page 68 and 69: The World Standard in Concrete Wate
Page 90: 88 ARCHITECTURAL RECORD APRIL 2015
Page 93 and 94:
POUND RIDGE HOUSE POUND RIDGE, NEW
Page 95 and 96:
POUND RIDGE HOUSE POUND RIDGE, NEW
Page 97 and 98:
95
Page 99 and 100:
BALINT HOUSE VALENCIA, SPAIN FRAN S
Page 101 and 102:
BALINT HOUSE VALENCIA, SPAIN FRAN S
Page 103 and 104:
ELEGANT ENTRANCE The foyer opens on
Page 105 and 106:
CARMEL RESIDENCE CARMEL, CALIFORNIA
Page 107 and 108:
CARMEL RESIDENCE CARMEL, CALIFORNIA
Page 110 and 111:
108 ARCHITECTURAL RECORD APRIL 2015
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
WHY ARCHITECTS LOVE US TO PIECES DA
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
CLASSMATES.
Page 132 and 133:
'&7%#6+10#.#&8'46+5'/'06 Photo cour
Page 134 and 135:
$7+.&+0)6'%*01.1)+'572&#6'(14/7.6+(
Page 136 and 137:
$7+.&+0)6'%*01.1)+'572&#6'(14/7.6+(
Page 138 and 139:
$7+.&+0)6'%*01.1)+'572&#6'(14/7.6+(
Page 140 and 141:
CIRCLE 26
Page 142 and 143:
CIRCLE 47
Page 144 and 145:
142 WHAT’S NEW IN RETAIL AND HOSP
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
CIRCLE 48
Page 154 and 155:
152 ADVERTISEMENT PRODUCT REVIEW Wh
Page 156 and 157:
Don’t just wrap it, BLOCK-IT * Ki
Page 158 and 159:
156 EFFECTIVE AND AFFORDABLE HOUSE
Page 160 and 161:
158 EFFECTIVE AND AFFORDABLE HOUSE
Page 162 and 163:
160 EDUCATIONAL-ADVERTISEMENT All i
Page 164 and 165:
162 THE SHIFT TO MODULAR REFRIGERAT
Page 166 and 167:
164 EDUCATIONAL-ADVERTISEMENT The S
Page 168 and 169:
166 EDUCATIONAL-ADVERTISEMENT CONTI
Page 170 and 171:
168 Advertisers Index Reader Advert
Page 172 and 173:
2015 CALL FOR ENTRIES Record Kitche
Page 174 and 175:
Hive BLOCK ©2013 modularArts, Inc.
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
176 snapshot ARCHITECTURAL RECORD A
Page 180:
Elevate the user experience with sl
show all

Architectural Record 2015-04

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?