26.02.2016 Views

The Cumulative Costs of Predatory Practices

3q15lYlTC

3q15lYlTC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Cumulative</strong> Impact<br />

At best, the costs <strong>of</strong> lending abuses are isolated to a single loan that is paid <strong>of</strong>f with capped (albeit<br />

excessive) costs borne by the borrower. However, the costs <strong>of</strong> predatory lending can also compound.<br />

As described in this chapter, many borrowers face excessive fees or interest rates, an inescapable<br />

cycle <strong>of</strong> debt, lost opportunities for wealth-building, and impaired credit from defaults brought about<br />

by an abusive loan. <strong>The</strong>y may see costs compound as the use <strong>of</strong> one predatory loan product spurs the<br />

use <strong>of</strong> yet another abusive loan. And if their communities are particular targets for predatory lending,<br />

they—and future generations—face a disproportionate impact compared with other communities.<br />

Figure 15 shows a theoretical—but completely likely—example <strong>of</strong> costs compounding for a<br />

borrower. In this case, a payday loan borrower pays excessive fees and interest and becomes caught<br />

in a debt trap, incurring high immediate costs. <strong>The</strong> borrower is overwhelmed and, attempting to<br />

stay afloat, takes out a car-title loan to pay <strong>of</strong>f the payday loan, incurring additional costs resulting<br />

from loan-stacking. Ultimately, the borrower defaults and loses his or her car, a critical asset for<br />

getting to and from work. This example highlights why focusing only at the immediate cost <strong>of</strong> the<br />

fee paid on the initial loan significantly underestimates the costs this abusive loan ultimately caused<br />

for the borrower.<br />

As described previously, certain populations and communities are more likely to receive loans with<br />

abusive features <strong>of</strong> all types. This creates another form <strong>of</strong> cumulative impact. For example, because<br />

<strong>of</strong> new mortgage lending laws, abusive subprime mortgages are largely gone from today’s mortgage<br />

market. However, the locations where these loans were most highly concentrated in the 2000s also<br />

have high concentrations <strong>of</strong> payday loans today. In addition, the populations that were most likely<br />

to receive abusive subprime loans a decade ago are also those most likely to receive loans with<br />

other abusive features today. In this way, the costs <strong>of</strong> one kind <strong>of</strong> abusive lending follow on the<br />

costs <strong>of</strong> previous lending abuses. Over time, communities struggle to get ahead as they bear<br />

compounding costs.<br />

Figure 15: Example <strong>of</strong> Compounding <strong>Costs</strong> for Borrowers<br />

$<br />

$<br />

$<br />

$<br />

Excessive Fees<br />

and Interest:<br />

This borrower takes<br />

out a payday loan and<br />

pays the high fees and<br />

interest associated<br />

with this product.<br />

Debt Trap:<br />

<strong>The</strong> borrower cannot pay<br />

back the loan and afford<br />

his regular expenses.<br />

As a result, he gets<br />

trapped in a cycle <strong>of</strong><br />

loans, reborrowing the<br />

principal and paying<br />

the fee over and over.<br />

Loan Stacking:<br />

In order to get out <strong>of</strong> the<br />

payday loan cycle, the<br />

borrower takes out<br />

a car-title loan.<br />

<strong>Costs</strong> <strong>of</strong> Default:<br />

Ultimately the borrower<br />

defaults on the cartitle<br />

loan and his car<br />

is repossessed.<br />

Center for Responsible Lending 29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!