26.02.2016 Views

The Cumulative Costs of Predatory Practices

3q15lYlTC

3q15lYlTC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Existing Laws & Regulations<br />

<strong>The</strong> Dodd-Frank Act supports sustainable mortgage lending<br />

<strong>The</strong> Dodd-Frank Act put in place new requirements for mortgages in the wake <strong>of</strong> the subprime crisis,<br />

including the Ability-to-Repay and Qualified Mortgage (QM) reforms. <strong>The</strong> Act restricted risky<br />

product features by allowing mortgages that fall into a QM category to be exempt from some liability<br />

provisions in the law. In addition to meeting one <strong>of</strong> four “pathways” to underwriting for affordability,23<br />

QM loans meet all <strong>of</strong> the following basic product feature requirements:<br />

• Full amortization,<br />

• Points and fees no greater than 3% <strong>of</strong> the total loan amount,<br />

• Loan term not to exceed 30 years, and<br />

• Evaluation <strong>of</strong> the borrower’s ability to repay adjustable-rate mortgages based on the maximum rate<br />

permitted during the first 5 years.<br />

Congress enacted these reforms in response to the mortgage crisis <strong>of</strong> the 2000s, in which subprime<br />

and near-subprime mortgages with risky features—such as lack <strong>of</strong> underwriting, interest-only or negatively<br />

amortizing loans, high points and fees, and prepayment penalties—defaulted at much higher<br />

rates than subprime loans without these features. For example, between 2000 and 2008, “Alt-A”<br />

mortgages—near-subprime loans with risky features—defaulted at a rate that was four times that <strong>of</strong><br />

loans originated at the same time that met the QM standard. <strong>The</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> abusive mortgage lending<br />

have been made all-too-clear by the Great Recession, but responsible mortgage lending remains<br />

an important tool for households to build wealth. Policymakers can, and have, put policies in place<br />

to promote responsible mortgage lending.<br />

23 <strong>The</strong>se options include:<br />

1. Loans underwritten to a back-end debt-to-income ratio <strong>of</strong> 43% or below, without a balloon payment.<br />

2. Loans eligible for a federal guarantee based on agency approved underwriting criteria including “compensating factors.”<br />

3. Loans originated by small lenders and held in portfolio that are underwritten in a way that considers debt-to-income.<br />

4. Balloon loans originated by lenders in rural or underserved areas and held in portfolio that are underwritten in a way that<br />

considers debt-to-income (after a two-year period <strong>of</strong> transition for all small creditors).<br />

Center for Responsible Lending 31

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!