Effektive, Niedrige Kosten, Nicht Sehr Bekannt, Umweltfreundliche Wassertechnologien Für Die Zukunft (Zusammenfassung in Deutsch)

• 56’NanoFiltration: continued 6
• -->> cont: Sometimes WM Disputed effect: M2(Desalination effect):
Aquaporin based filter claims to use 1/2 of energy cost of RO(Mangrove Membranes Inc -
Applied Biomimetic, Aquaporin dk+): actually it should be much less than 1/2 due to little to
no energy required, maybe due to its filter's fragile nature? Facilitated diffusion/ion-charge
gradient difference based, Also other ion channeling biomimicry filters under research. Again
various nanofilters can do this type at lab levels: Use of electrical Double Layer & charging
nanopores of filter to electromigrate/separate salt ions.
• Unlisted effect(Descaling pipes & corrosion prevention)(AquaClear LLC, WEHRLE Umwelt,
Shivam Water Treaters +)
• Occasionally claimed Generally media type Rejected effect: I2(Solubility increase of treated
water), O2(Hydroxyl radical production), Currently clumsy set up as this is basically WM
approved effect
• WM Fully rejected: Same effect claims should be made between Nanofilter & 55’Nano
Material treated water, but probably due to small number of claimant samples(less than 50),
claims shown on the list are not identical. As for effectiveness approval level by WM,
finished product filter has more severe debunking than nanocarbon. (Also See these in
reference to 22’Nano Material Used Filter), Q2(food stock preservation water), S2(Bioenhancing
water), T2(metal rust reduction/prevention), V2(Low redox potential); it can be other way
around(hydroxyl production) depends on set up, A3(Deuterium Depleted Water production),
• Weak effects J2(emulsion) 287