Effektive, Niedrige Kosten, Nicht Sehr Bekannt, Umweltfreundliche Wassertechnologien Für Die Zukunft (Zusammenfassung in Deutsch)

• 59’Ferrous Ferric ion/Ferrate ion water: Continued 10
♛ Iron Sulphate Depositing in water 7 RISK FACTOR
• —>> cont: WM Fully rejected effect: S2(bioenhancing): RISK assessment:
• B- Less limited i.e. wider data sourcing than WM(western mainstream) & its
evaluation leads to somewhat different risks/evaluation conclusion:
• iv-Effect of large volcano eruption on fish increase has been "tested" with
seemingly no major long term negative effect, but artificial Ferric ion dispersion
has been done only in super small level(0.5-120ton), hence large scale impact
of mono nutrient chemical dispersion is really inconclusive (volcano ash has mix
of phosphate, iron, silica, manganese etc, and even has another
pseudoscientific idea of seeming very strong bioenhancing effect causing
ORMUS[section 63']).
• v-It is plausible there are variable cases when rapid increase of phytoplankton
does not lead to increased fish stock or even zooplankton(combo element with
other nutrients in water, location, timing & duration, sunlight duration, fish
travelling route vs temperature & ocean current change etc): highly likely it
requires strong skill & know-how: like casting bait & net that involves hit & miss
linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm - Ben Rusuisiak: Specialty Cleantech Research, Vancouver, Canada
307