Effektive, Niedrige Kosten, Nicht Sehr Bekannt, Umweltfreundliche Wassertechnologien Für Die Zukunft (Zusammenfassung in Deutsch)

• 18’Electrolysis Alkaline-Acid mixed: Effect mix of Accepted,
Disputed, Fully rejected by Western Mainstream(WM)
• ■ 18’Electrolysis Alkaline-Acid mixed. Here it covers somewhat unique versions of
standard type water processes that are not necessarily widely used in all situations/
applications.、
WM Accepted effect: S(Coagulation, toxin separation): i -Electrocoagulation: Prior to
WM official acceptance, electrocoagulation had long been demonstrated
effectiveness by "pseudoscientist" or by ex Soviets since 1900s. Past debunking was
based on selective focus on devices produced large sludge vol, needed high use of
electricity, electrode fouling/passivation/deposition build up, performed erratically
etc. This "fact" was exclusively accepted by media, and seemingly unclear exact
mechanics helped their discrediting effort,
• But after yr 2000 some major acceptance push seemed to have taken place for this
disruptive tech by mainstream European groups and their media by actually
somewhat diverged from US/Canada media-industrial groups. Then some of effective
version was more or less highlighted & whole tech was officially accepted(Powell
Water Recovery, McKay Creek Technologies+), This might have significance that WM
actually is willing to introduce lower cost effective technologies at expense of
existing profitable systems with wide spread consequences. -->> continue
linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm
- Ben Rusuisiak, Vancouver BC, Canada
96