08.08.2016 Views

The un(der)banked is FinTech’s largest opportunity

DeNovo-Quarterly-Q2-2016.pdf?utm_content=buffer9dd60&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter

DeNovo-Quarterly-Q2-2016.pdf?utm_content=buffer9dd60&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

will look to establ<strong>is</strong>h partnerships to deliver enhanced services,<br />

and incumbent financial institutions will play a larger role in the<br />

<strong>un</strong>(<strong>der</strong>)<strong>banked</strong> markets. Those companies that can align the delivery<br />

services with evolving consumer behavior will be in a stronger position<br />

to migrate the formerly <strong>un</strong>(<strong>der</strong>)<strong>banked</strong> consumer from simple payment<br />

activity to the traditional banking system.<br />

Within the evolving competitive landscape,<br />

mobile network operators also face change<br />

<strong>The</strong> ease with which applications are now d<strong>is</strong>tributed and used also<br />

<strong>is</strong> a consi<strong>der</strong>ation. MNOs are shifting away from “closed loop” strategies<br />

and ceding control of the application and product features to third<br />

parties. It <strong>is</strong> now commonplace for MNOs to sign reciprocity<br />

agreements, which <strong>is</strong> leading to further fragmentation of the<br />

payment or money services ecosystem.<br />

<strong>The</strong> initial phase of mobile money services involved tight integration<br />

of capabilities into phone services with predeveloped services or<br />

applications resident in the SIM cards. <strong>The</strong> evolution and, more<br />

important, adoption of the smartphone could loosen the grip that<br />

MNOs have over the services that reach consumers through their<br />

respective mobile networks. Many MNO-operated money services act<br />

as gatekeepers for amenities provided to mobile phone users, requiring<br />

direct integration, revenue sharing agreements, and other hurdles for<br />

partners to deliver new financial services to a captive <strong>un</strong>(<strong>der</strong>)<strong>banked</strong><br />

audience.<br />

<strong>The</strong> broa<strong>der</strong> use of application program interfaces (APIs) <strong>is</strong> also<br />

contributing to the fragmentation of basic services. As open APIs<br />

continue to increase in use, the cost burden and time-to-market for new<br />

financial services will be substantially lower. Third parties can more<br />

seamlessly build new products on top of core mobile money services and<br />

can replicate the impact of app markets on smartphone adoption. Th<strong>is</strong><br />

provides the potential to skip the process of working directly with<br />

MNOs and build new products, such as e-commerce shopping tools,<br />

international remittance, and bill pay, for anyone with a smartphone.<br />

However, many apps provided by either money services companies or<br />

MNOs have been relatively primitive.<br />

Many mobile money provi<strong>der</strong>s have not yet offered banking services<br />

beyond basic money transfer, even in co<strong>un</strong>tries with substantial mobile<br />

phone adoption. For example, although 91% of Ghanaian adults own a<br />

mobile phone, only 5% have used a phone to pay bills, and 1% have used<br />

a phone to pay for goods in a store. 12 At th<strong>is</strong> stage, mobile money<br />

provi<strong>der</strong>s have not succeeded in selling services beyond basic money<br />

Strategy&<br />

15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!