18.08.2016 Views

INTENSIVE CARE

8dI2AMDUa

8dI2AMDUa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

surfactant treatment strategy to avoid mechanical ventilation; we<br />

differentiated early from late failures to assess the contribution<br />

of potential mechanisms such as respiratory depression versus<br />

less-effective surfactant delivery. Secondary outcomes addressed<br />

efficacy and safety end points.”<br />

Results<br />

It was noted in the study that “with accruing evidence that<br />

the LMA is easier to use than an ETT, 15,16 causes less pain,<br />

trauma and neurocirculatory disturbances than endotracheal<br />

intubation, 24-27 and can be used for surfactant delivery, 15,17,18 we<br />

envisioned a potentially advantageous alternative to INSURE.”<br />

The results of the study backed up what the authors “envisioned”<br />

as out of the patients who were studied, the “failure rate was<br />

77% in the ETT group and 30% in the LMA group (Po0.001). The<br />

difference was related to early failure, as late failure rates did not<br />

differ between groups. FiO2 decrease after surfactant and rates<br />

of adverse events were similar between groups.”<br />

The study authors expanded on these results, saying that “we<br />

found a substantially higher rate of failure to avoid mechanical<br />

ventilation in the ETT group, which was accounted for by early<br />

failures, suggesting that respiratory depression due to morphine<br />

premedication was principally responsible for the apparent<br />

superiority of the LMA strategy.”<br />

The study included one note about how the LMA approach could<br />

also benefit certain types of health care providers that might be<br />

lacking resources: “As our study targeted neonates ≥29 weeks,<br />

the results may not apply to more immature populations. There<br />

is only one reported neonate weighing 1000 g who received<br />

surfactant through an LMA, 18 as a size 1 LMA (the smallest<br />

available) is relatively large for such patients. Still, the LMA<br />

may be an important alternative to intubation for surfactant<br />

administration in settings with low resources 20,28 or limited staff<br />

expertise in intubation.” 29<br />

In conclusion, the study authors wrote that “rescue surfactant<br />

through an LMA in newborns with mild-to-moderate RDS<br />

produces physiological and short-term clinical outcomes similar<br />

to a morphine-based INSURE approach while obviating the need<br />

for laryngoscopy, tracheal intubation and analgesia. As morphine<br />

likely increased post-intubation ventilatory requirements,<br />

optimal premedication strategies for INSURE should avoid<br />

morphine and minimize the duration of respiratory depression—<br />

which might be achievable with a rapid-onset, short-acting agent<br />

such as remifentanil. Larger studies could then evaluate whether<br />

less-invasive surfactant delivery via LMA produces respiratory<br />

outcomes equivalent to those of an optimized INSURE<br />

approach.”<br />

References<br />

1 Verder H, Albertsen P, Ebbesen F, Greisen G, Robertson<br />

B, Bertelsen A et al. Nasal continuous positive airway<br />

pressure and early surfactant therapy for respiratory distress<br />

syndrome in newborns of less than 30 weeks’ gestation.<br />

Pediatrics 1999; 103(2): E24.<br />

2 Stevens TP, Harrington EW, Blennow M, Soll RF. Early<br />

surfactant administration with brief ventilation vs. selective<br />

surfactant and continued mechanical ventilation for preterm<br />

infants with or at risk for respiratory distress syndrome.<br />

Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; (4): CD003063.<br />

3 Neonatal Resuscitation Textbook. 6th edn. American Heart<br />

Association and American Academy of Pediatrics: Elk Grove<br />

Village, IL, USA, 2011.<br />

4 Dempsey EM, Al Hazzani F, Faucher D, Barrington KJ.<br />

Facilitation of neonatal endotracheal intubation with<br />

mivacurium and fentanyl in the neonatal intensive care unit.<br />

Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2006; 91(4): F279–F282.<br />

5 Friesen RH, Honda AT, Thieme RE. Changes in anterior<br />

fontanel pressure in preterm neonates during tracheal<br />

intubation. Anesth Analg 1987; 66(9): 874–878.<br />

6 Marshall TA, Deeder R, Pai S, Berkowitz GP, Austin TL.<br />

Physiologic changes associated with endotracheal intubation<br />

in preterm infants. Crit Care Med 1984; 12(6): 501–503.<br />

7 Barrington K. Canadian Paediatric Society Fetus and<br />

Newborn Committee. Premedication for endotracheal<br />

intubation in the newborn infant. Paediatr Child Health 2011;<br />

16(3): 159–171.<br />

8 Kumar P, Denson SE, Mancuso TJ. American Academy of<br />

Pediatrics Committee on Fetus and Newborn and Section<br />

on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine. Premedication for<br />

nonemergency endotracheal intubation in the neonate.<br />

Pediatrics 2010; 125(3): 608–615.<br />

9 Byrne E, MacKinnon R. Should premedication be used for<br />

semi-urgent or elective intubation in neonates? Arch Dis<br />

Child 2006; 91(1): 79–83.<br />

10 Carbajal R, Eble B, Anand KJ. Premedication for tracheal<br />

intubation in neonates: confusion or controversy? Semin<br />

Perinatol 2007; 31(5): 309–317.<br />

11 Kingma PS. Is premedication for intubation of preterm<br />

infants the right choice? J Pediatr 2011; 159(6): 883–884.<br />

12 Oei J, Hari R, Butha T, Lui K. Facilitation of neonatal<br />

nasotracheal intubation with premedication: a randomized<br />

controlled trial. J Paediatr Child Health 2002; 38(2): 146–150.<br />

13 Bohlin K, Gudmundsdottir T, Katz-Salamon M, Jonsson B,<br />

Blennow M. Implementation of surfactant treatment during<br />

continuous positive airway pressure. J Perinatol 2007; 27(7):<br />

422–427.<br />

14 Verder H, Robertson B, Greisen G, Ebbesen F, Albertsen P,<br />

Lundstrom K et al. Surfactant therapy and nasal continuous<br />

positive airway pressure for newborns with respiratory<br />

distress syndrome. Danish-Swedish Multicenter Study Group.<br />

N Engl J Med 1994; 331(16): 1051–1055.<br />

15 Trevisanuto D, Grazzina N, Ferrarese P, Micaglio M, Verghese<br />

C, Zanardo V. Laryngeal mask airway used as a delivery<br />

conduit for the administration of surfactant to preterm<br />

infants with respiratory distress syndrome. Biol Neonate<br />

2005; 87(4): 217–220.<br />

16 Chen L, Hsiao AL. Randomized trial of endotracheal tube<br />

versus laryngeal mask airway in simulated prehospital<br />

pediatric arrest. Pediatrics 2008; 122(2): e294–e297.<br />

17 Brimacombe J, Gandini D, Keller C. The laryngeal mask<br />

airway for administration of surfactant in two neonates with<br />

respiratory distress syndrome. Paediatr Anaesth 2004; 14(2):<br />

188–190.<br />

18 Brimacombe J, Gandini D. Airway rescue and drug delivery<br />

in an 800 g neonate with the laryngeal mask airway. Paediatr<br />

Anaesth 1999; 9(2): 178.<br />

19 Micaglio M, Zanardo V, Ori C, Parotto M, Doglioni N,<br />

Trevisanuto D, ProSeal LMA. for surfactant administration.<br />

Paediatr Anaesth 2008; 18(1): 91–92.<br />

20 Attridge J, Stewart C, Stukenborg G, Kattwinkel J.<br />

Administration of rescue surfactant by laryngeal mask<br />

airway: lessons from a pilot trial. Am J Perinatol 2013; 30(3):<br />

201–206.<br />

21 Roberts KD, Lampland AL, Meyers PA, Worwa CT, Plumm<br />

26 neonatal <strong>INTENSIVE</strong> <strong>CARE</strong> Vol. 29 No. 4 • Fall 2016

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!