18.08.2016 Views

INTENSIVE CARE

8dI2AMDUa

8dI2AMDUa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

surfactant treatment strategy to avoid mechanical ventilation; we<br />

differentiated early from late failures to assess the contribution<br />

of potential mechanisms such as respiratory depression versus<br />

less-effective surfactant delivery. Secondary outcomes addressed<br />

efficacy and safety end points.”<br />

Results<br />

It was noted in the study that “with accruing evidence that<br />

the LMA is easier to use than an ETT, 15,16 causes less pain,<br />

trauma and neurocirculatory disturbances than endotracheal<br />

intubation, 24-27 and can be used for surfactant delivery, 15,17,18 we<br />

envisioned a potentially advantageous alternative to INSURE.”<br />

The results of the study backed up what the authors “envisioned”<br />

as out of the patients who were studied, the “failure rate was<br />

77% in the ETT group and 30% in the LMA group (Po0.001). The<br />

difference was related to early failure, as late failure rates did not<br />

differ between groups. FiO2 decrease after surfactant and rates<br />

of adverse events were similar between groups.”<br />

The study authors expanded on these results, saying that “we<br />

found a substantially higher rate of failure to avoid mechanical<br />

ventilation in the ETT group, which was accounted for by early<br />

failures, suggesting that respiratory depression due to morphine<br />

premedication was principally responsible for the apparent<br />

superiority of the LMA strategy.”<br />

The study included one note about how the LMA approach could<br />

also benefit certain types of health care providers that might be<br />

lacking resources: “As our study targeted neonates ≥29 weeks,<br />

the results may not apply to more immature populations. There<br />

is only one reported neonate weighing 1000 g who received<br />

surfactant through an LMA, 18 as a size 1 LMA (the smallest<br />

available) is relatively large for such patients. Still, the LMA<br />

may be an important alternative to intubation for surfactant<br />

administration in settings with low resources 20,28 or limited staff<br />

expertise in intubation.” 29<br />

In conclusion, the study authors wrote that “rescue surfactant<br />

through an LMA in newborns with mild-to-moderate RDS<br />

produces physiological and short-term clinical outcomes similar<br />

to a morphine-based INSURE approach while obviating the need<br />

for laryngoscopy, tracheal intubation and analgesia. As morphine<br />

likely increased post-intubation ventilatory requirements,<br />

optimal premedication strategies for INSURE should avoid<br />

morphine and minimize the duration of respiratory depression—<br />

which might be achievable with a rapid-onset, short-acting agent<br />

such as remifentanil. Larger studies could then evaluate whether<br />

less-invasive surfactant delivery via LMA produces respiratory<br />

outcomes equivalent to those of an optimized INSURE<br />

approach.”<br />

References<br />

1 Verder H, Albertsen P, Ebbesen F, Greisen G, Robertson<br />

B, Bertelsen A et al. Nasal continuous positive airway<br />

pressure and early surfactant therapy for respiratory distress<br />

syndrome in newborns of less than 30 weeks’ gestation.<br />

Pediatrics 1999; 103(2): E24.<br />

2 Stevens TP, Harrington EW, Blennow M, Soll RF. Early<br />

surfactant administration with brief ventilation vs. selective<br />

surfactant and continued mechanical ventilation for preterm<br />

infants with or at risk for respiratory distress syndrome.<br />

Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; (4): CD003063.<br />

3 Neonatal Resuscitation Textbook. 6th edn. American Heart<br />

Association and American Academy of Pediatrics: Elk Grove<br />

Village, IL, USA, 2011.<br />

4 Dempsey EM, Al Hazzani F, Faucher D, Barrington KJ.<br />

Facilitation of neonatal endotracheal intubation with<br />

mivacurium and fentanyl in the neonatal intensive care unit.<br />

Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2006; 91(4): F279–F282.<br />

5 Friesen RH, Honda AT, Thieme RE. Changes in anterior<br />

fontanel pressure in preterm neonates during tracheal<br />

intubation. Anesth Analg 1987; 66(9): 874–878.<br />

6 Marshall TA, Deeder R, Pai S, Berkowitz GP, Austin TL.<br />

Physiologic changes associated with endotracheal intubation<br />

in preterm infants. Crit Care Med 1984; 12(6): 501–503.<br />

7 Barrington K. Canadian Paediatric Society Fetus and<br />

Newborn Committee. Premedication for endotracheal<br />

intubation in the newborn infant. Paediatr Child Health 2011;<br />

16(3): 159–171.<br />

8 Kumar P, Denson SE, Mancuso TJ. American Academy of<br />

Pediatrics Committee on Fetus and Newborn and Section<br />

on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine. Premedication for<br />

nonemergency endotracheal intubation in the neonate.<br />

Pediatrics 2010; 125(3): 608–615.<br />

9 Byrne E, MacKinnon R. Should premedication be used for<br />

semi-urgent or elective intubation in neonates? Arch Dis<br />

Child 2006; 91(1): 79–83.<br />

10 Carbajal R, Eble B, Anand KJ. Premedication for tracheal<br />

intubation in neonates: confusion or controversy? Semin<br />

Perinatol 2007; 31(5): 309–317.<br />

11 Kingma PS. Is premedication for intubation of preterm<br />

infants the right choice? J Pediatr 2011; 159(6): 883–884.<br />

12 Oei J, Hari R, Butha T, Lui K. Facilitation of neonatal<br />

nasotracheal intubation with premedication: a randomized<br />

controlled trial. J Paediatr Child Health 2002; 38(2): 146–150.<br />

13 Bohlin K, Gudmundsdottir T, Katz-Salamon M, Jonsson B,<br />

Blennow M. Implementation of surfactant treatment during<br />

continuous positive airway pressure. J Perinatol 2007; 27(7):<br />

422–427.<br />

14 Verder H, Robertson B, Greisen G, Ebbesen F, Albertsen P,<br />

Lundstrom K et al. Surfactant therapy and nasal continuous<br />

positive airway pressure for newborns with respiratory<br />

distress syndrome. Danish-Swedish Multicenter Study Group.<br />

N Engl J Med 1994; 331(16): 1051–1055.<br />

15 Trevisanuto D, Grazzina N, Ferrarese P, Micaglio M, Verghese<br />

C, Zanardo V. Laryngeal mask airway used as a delivery<br />

conduit for the administration of surfactant to preterm<br />

infants with respiratory distress syndrome. Biol Neonate<br />

2005; 87(4): 217–220.<br />

16 Chen L, Hsiao AL. Randomized trial of endotracheal tube<br />

versus laryngeal mask airway in simulated prehospital<br />

pediatric arrest. Pediatrics 2008; 122(2): e294–e297.<br />

17 Brimacombe J, Gandini D, Keller C. The laryngeal mask<br />

airway for administration of surfactant in two neonates with<br />

respiratory distress syndrome. Paediatr Anaesth 2004; 14(2):<br />

188–190.<br />

18 Brimacombe J, Gandini D. Airway rescue and drug delivery<br />

in an 800 g neonate with the laryngeal mask airway. Paediatr<br />

Anaesth 1999; 9(2): 178.<br />

19 Micaglio M, Zanardo V, Ori C, Parotto M, Doglioni N,<br />

Trevisanuto D, ProSeal LMA. for surfactant administration.<br />

Paediatr Anaesth 2008; 18(1): 91–92.<br />

20 Attridge J, Stewart C, Stukenborg G, Kattwinkel J.<br />

Administration of rescue surfactant by laryngeal mask<br />

airway: lessons from a pilot trial. Am J Perinatol 2013; 30(3):<br />

201–206.<br />

21 Roberts KD, Lampland AL, Meyers PA, Worwa CT, Plumm<br />

26 neonatal <strong>INTENSIVE</strong> <strong>CARE</strong> Vol. 29 No. 4 • Fall 2016

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!