INTENSIVE CARE
8dI2AMDUa
8dI2AMDUa
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
surfactant treatment strategy to avoid mechanical ventilation; we<br />
differentiated early from late failures to assess the contribution<br />
of potential mechanisms such as respiratory depression versus<br />
less-effective surfactant delivery. Secondary outcomes addressed<br />
efficacy and safety end points.”<br />
Results<br />
It was noted in the study that “with accruing evidence that<br />
the LMA is easier to use than an ETT, 15,16 causes less pain,<br />
trauma and neurocirculatory disturbances than endotracheal<br />
intubation, 24-27 and can be used for surfactant delivery, 15,17,18 we<br />
envisioned a potentially advantageous alternative to INSURE.”<br />
The results of the study backed up what the authors “envisioned”<br />
as out of the patients who were studied, the “failure rate was<br />
77% in the ETT group and 30% in the LMA group (Po0.001). The<br />
difference was related to early failure, as late failure rates did not<br />
differ between groups. FiO2 decrease after surfactant and rates<br />
of adverse events were similar between groups.”<br />
The study authors expanded on these results, saying that “we<br />
found a substantially higher rate of failure to avoid mechanical<br />
ventilation in the ETT group, which was accounted for by early<br />
failures, suggesting that respiratory depression due to morphine<br />
premedication was principally responsible for the apparent<br />
superiority of the LMA strategy.”<br />
The study included one note about how the LMA approach could<br />
also benefit certain types of health care providers that might be<br />
lacking resources: “As our study targeted neonates ≥29 weeks,<br />
the results may not apply to more immature populations. There<br />
is only one reported neonate weighing 1000 g who received<br />
surfactant through an LMA, 18 as a size 1 LMA (the smallest<br />
available) is relatively large for such patients. Still, the LMA<br />
may be an important alternative to intubation for surfactant<br />
administration in settings with low resources 20,28 or limited staff<br />
expertise in intubation.” 29<br />
In conclusion, the study authors wrote that “rescue surfactant<br />
through an LMA in newborns with mild-to-moderate RDS<br />
produces physiological and short-term clinical outcomes similar<br />
to a morphine-based INSURE approach while obviating the need<br />
for laryngoscopy, tracheal intubation and analgesia. As morphine<br />
likely increased post-intubation ventilatory requirements,<br />
optimal premedication strategies for INSURE should avoid<br />
morphine and minimize the duration of respiratory depression—<br />
which might be achievable with a rapid-onset, short-acting agent<br />
such as remifentanil. Larger studies could then evaluate whether<br />
less-invasive surfactant delivery via LMA produces respiratory<br />
outcomes equivalent to those of an optimized INSURE<br />
approach.”<br />
References<br />
1 Verder H, Albertsen P, Ebbesen F, Greisen G, Robertson<br />
B, Bertelsen A et al. Nasal continuous positive airway<br />
pressure and early surfactant therapy for respiratory distress<br />
syndrome in newborns of less than 30 weeks’ gestation.<br />
Pediatrics 1999; 103(2): E24.<br />
2 Stevens TP, Harrington EW, Blennow M, Soll RF. Early<br />
surfactant administration with brief ventilation vs. selective<br />
surfactant and continued mechanical ventilation for preterm<br />
infants with or at risk for respiratory distress syndrome.<br />
Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; (4): CD003063.<br />
3 Neonatal Resuscitation Textbook. 6th edn. American Heart<br />
Association and American Academy of Pediatrics: Elk Grove<br />
Village, IL, USA, 2011.<br />
4 Dempsey EM, Al Hazzani F, Faucher D, Barrington KJ.<br />
Facilitation of neonatal endotracheal intubation with<br />
mivacurium and fentanyl in the neonatal intensive care unit.<br />
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2006; 91(4): F279–F282.<br />
5 Friesen RH, Honda AT, Thieme RE. Changes in anterior<br />
fontanel pressure in preterm neonates during tracheal<br />
intubation. Anesth Analg 1987; 66(9): 874–878.<br />
6 Marshall TA, Deeder R, Pai S, Berkowitz GP, Austin TL.<br />
Physiologic changes associated with endotracheal intubation<br />
in preterm infants. Crit Care Med 1984; 12(6): 501–503.<br />
7 Barrington K. Canadian Paediatric Society Fetus and<br />
Newborn Committee. Premedication for endotracheal<br />
intubation in the newborn infant. Paediatr Child Health 2011;<br />
16(3): 159–171.<br />
8 Kumar P, Denson SE, Mancuso TJ. American Academy of<br />
Pediatrics Committee on Fetus and Newborn and Section<br />
on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine. Premedication for<br />
nonemergency endotracheal intubation in the neonate.<br />
Pediatrics 2010; 125(3): 608–615.<br />
9 Byrne E, MacKinnon R. Should premedication be used for<br />
semi-urgent or elective intubation in neonates? Arch Dis<br />
Child 2006; 91(1): 79–83.<br />
10 Carbajal R, Eble B, Anand KJ. Premedication for tracheal<br />
intubation in neonates: confusion or controversy? Semin<br />
Perinatol 2007; 31(5): 309–317.<br />
11 Kingma PS. Is premedication for intubation of preterm<br />
infants the right choice? J Pediatr 2011; 159(6): 883–884.<br />
12 Oei J, Hari R, Butha T, Lui K. Facilitation of neonatal<br />
nasotracheal intubation with premedication: a randomized<br />
controlled trial. J Paediatr Child Health 2002; 38(2): 146–150.<br />
13 Bohlin K, Gudmundsdottir T, Katz-Salamon M, Jonsson B,<br />
Blennow M. Implementation of surfactant treatment during<br />
continuous positive airway pressure. J Perinatol 2007; 27(7):<br />
422–427.<br />
14 Verder H, Robertson B, Greisen G, Ebbesen F, Albertsen P,<br />
Lundstrom K et al. Surfactant therapy and nasal continuous<br />
positive airway pressure for newborns with respiratory<br />
distress syndrome. Danish-Swedish Multicenter Study Group.<br />
N Engl J Med 1994; 331(16): 1051–1055.<br />
15 Trevisanuto D, Grazzina N, Ferrarese P, Micaglio M, Verghese<br />
C, Zanardo V. Laryngeal mask airway used as a delivery<br />
conduit for the administration of surfactant to preterm<br />
infants with respiratory distress syndrome. Biol Neonate<br />
2005; 87(4): 217–220.<br />
16 Chen L, Hsiao AL. Randomized trial of endotracheal tube<br />
versus laryngeal mask airway in simulated prehospital<br />
pediatric arrest. Pediatrics 2008; 122(2): e294–e297.<br />
17 Brimacombe J, Gandini D, Keller C. The laryngeal mask<br />
airway for administration of surfactant in two neonates with<br />
respiratory distress syndrome. Paediatr Anaesth 2004; 14(2):<br />
188–190.<br />
18 Brimacombe J, Gandini D. Airway rescue and drug delivery<br />
in an 800 g neonate with the laryngeal mask airway. Paediatr<br />
Anaesth 1999; 9(2): 178.<br />
19 Micaglio M, Zanardo V, Ori C, Parotto M, Doglioni N,<br />
Trevisanuto D, ProSeal LMA. for surfactant administration.<br />
Paediatr Anaesth 2008; 18(1): 91–92.<br />
20 Attridge J, Stewart C, Stukenborg G, Kattwinkel J.<br />
Administration of rescue surfactant by laryngeal mask<br />
airway: lessons from a pilot trial. Am J Perinatol 2013; 30(3):<br />
201–206.<br />
21 Roberts KD, Lampland AL, Meyers PA, Worwa CT, Plumm<br />
26 neonatal <strong>INTENSIVE</strong> <strong>CARE</strong> Vol. 29 No. 4 • Fall 2016