18.08.2016 Views

INTENSIVE CARE

8dI2AMDUa

8dI2AMDUa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 3 The fraction of dead/enrolled children by place o<br />

Lund et al. BMC Pediatrics 2014, 14:214 Table 3 The fraction of dead/enrolled children by Page place 7 of of 11<br />

enrolment, month of enrolment, and randomisation group<br />

http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2431/14/214<br />

enrolment, month of enrolment, and randomisation group<br />

No. of deaths/enrolled (% dead)<br />

No. of deaths/enrolled (% dead)<br />

Enrolled Enrolled at neonatal<br />

neonatal Enrolled at maternity Enrolled at maternity<br />

nursery nursery ward or health ward centres or health centre<br />

Table 3 The fraction of dead/enrolled children by place of<br />

Month of enrolment VAS OPV VAS OPV<br />

enrolment,<br />

Month of<br />

month<br />

enrolment<br />

of enrolment,<br />

VAS<br />

and randomisation<br />

OPV VAS<br />

group<br />

OPV<br />

February 0/0 (0) 1/2 (50) 0/4 (0) 1/4 (25)<br />

February No. 0/0 of deaths/enrolled (0) 1/2 (50) (% dead) 0/4 (0) 1/4 (25)<br />

March 2/3 (67) 0/4 (0) 0/11 (0) 1/10 (10)<br />

March Enrolled 2/3 at neonatal (67) 0/4 Enrolled (0) at maternity 0/11 (0) 1/10 (10)<br />

April 2/6 (33) nursery 1/4 (25) ward 0/8 (0) or health 1/10 centres (10)<br />

April 2/6 (33) 1/4 (25) 0/8 (0) 1/10 (10)<br />

Month May of enrolment 0/5 VAS (0) 3/4 OPV (75) 1/9 VAS (11) 1/7 OPV (14)<br />

February Total, May dry season 4/14 0/0 (29) (0) 0/55/14 1/2 (0)(50) (36) 3/4 1/32 0/4 (75) (0) (3) 1/9 4/31 1/4 (11) (25) (13) 1/7 (14)<br />

June March Total, dry season 2/3 0/2 (67) (0) 4/140/4 (29) (0) 5/14 0/11 0/5 (36) (0) 1/32 1/10 0/6 (10) (0) (3) 4/31 (13)<br />

July April<br />

June 1/3 2/6 (33) 1/4 0/1 (25)<br />

0/2 (0) (0) 1/6 0/8 (17) (0)<br />

0/4 (0)<br />

1/10 0/8 (10)<br />

0/5 (0) 0/6 (0)<br />

August May 1/2 0/5 (50) (0) 3/4 0/2 (75) (0) 1/9 0/8 (11) (0) 1/7 0/5 (14) (0)<br />

July 1/3 (33) 0/1 (0) 1/6 (17) 0/8 (0)<br />

September Total, dry season 4/14 5/6 (83) (29) 5/14 1/6 (17) (36) 1/32 1/9 (11) (3) 4/31 0/9 (13) (0)<br />

August 1/2 (50) 0/2 (0) 0/8 (0) 0/5 (0)<br />

October June 0/4 0/2 (0) 0/0 0/4 (0) 0/17 0/5 (0) 0/20 0/6 (0)<br />

November JulySeptember 1/3 0/0 (33) (0) 5/6 0/1 0/3 (83)(0) 1/6 1/6 0/8 (17) (0) 1/9 0/8 0/7 (11) (0)<br />

0/9 (0)<br />

Total, August October rainy season 7/17 1/2 (50) (41) 0/41/16 0/2 (0) (0) (6) 0/0 2/53 0/8 (0) (4) 0/17 0/55 (0) 0/20 (0)<br />

Figure 2 Cumulative mortality curves as a function of receiving<br />

VAS or OPV. (a) Overall, (b) Dry season, (c) Rainy season.<br />

respiratory diseases [21]. However, VAS was not harmful.<br />

The effect of OPV0 on growth has not been studied before.<br />

Figure 2 Cumulative mortality curves as a function of receiving<br />

VAS or OPV. (a) Overall, (b) Dry season, (c) Rainy season.<br />

Figure Chance 2. 2 Cumulative or cluster mortality mortality curves curves as a function as a function of receiving of VAS receiving or OPV.<br />

(a) Overall, The(b) sudden Dry season, increase (c) Rainy in season.<br />

VAS or the number of deaths among<br />

respiratory<br />

OPV. (a) Overall,<br />

diseases<br />

(b)<br />

[21].<br />

Dry season,<br />

However,<br />

(c) Rainy<br />

VAS was<br />

season.<br />

not harmful.<br />

boys who had received VAS and who had been in contact<br />

The effect of OPV0 on growth has not been studied before.<br />

with the neonatal nursery made us speculate that they had<br />

been infected with a pathogen that either interacted negativelyamong<br />

with VAS children or was recruited dealt better in October with byand OPV November. vaccinated<br />

Likewise Chance we conducted or cluster immunological examinations of cytokine<br />

responses The sudden increase in the number of deaths among<br />

Few children boys. Awere pathogen included could and the easily cluster haveof spread deaths had among the<br />

boys who had received VAS and who had been in contact<br />

passed. children Hence, through the results thewere suboptimal unrevealing. hygienic conditions. We<br />

Chancewith or cluster the neonatal nursery made us speculate that they had<br />

could not identify any likely pathogen or immunological<br />

been infected with a pathogen that either interacted negatively<br />

statistical methods<br />

Statistical analysis<br />

with VAS<br />

was<br />

or<br />

performed<br />

was dealt better<br />

using Stata<br />

with<br />

11.2<br />

by OPV<br />

software<br />

vaccinated<br />

(Stata boys. Corporation, A pathogen College could Station, easily TX). have Baseline spread characteristics among the<br />

of children children in the through VAS group the suboptimal vs. children hygienic in the OPV conditions. group were We<br />

compared couldusing not logistic identifyor any linear likely regression. pathogen or immunological<br />

respiratory diseases [21]. However, VAS was not harmful.<br />

The effect of OPV0 on growth has not been studied before.<br />

The sudden increase in the number of deaths among<br />

boys who had received VAS and who had been in contact<br />

with the neonatal nursery made us speculate that they had<br />

been infected with a pathogen that either interacted negatively<br />

with VAS or was dealt better with by OPV vaccinated<br />

boys. A pathogen could easily have spread among the<br />

children through the suboptimal hygienic conditions. We<br />

Total September November 11/31 5/6 (83) (35) 0/06/30 1/6 (0)(17) (20) 0/3 3/85 1/9 (0) (11) (4) 0/8 4/86 0/9 (0) (5) 0/7 (0)<br />

October 0/4 (0) 0/0 (0)<br />

Total, rainy season 7/17 (41)<br />

0/17 (0)<br />

1/16 (6)<br />

0/20 (0)<br />

2/53 (4) 0/55 (0)<br />

November 0/0 (0) 0/3 (0) 0/8 (0) 0/7 (0)<br />

We differences used Total Cox between regression theto two 11/31 calculate groups (35) Hazard which 6/30 (20) Ratios could(HR) 3/85 explain (4) for 4/86 (5)<br />

mortality<br />

Total, rainy<br />

with<br />

season<br />

95% Confidence<br />

7/17 (41)<br />

Intervals<br />

1/16 (6)<br />

(CI).<br />

2/53 (4)<br />

Robust<br />

0/55<br />

standard<br />

(0)<br />

the cluster, but this is perhaps not surprising as the mortality<br />

was no longer elevated at the time when we collected<br />

errors Total were used to account 11/31 (35) for 6/30 interdependency (20) 3/85 (4) of outcome 4/86 (5)<br />

between twins. Age was used as the underlying time and was<br />

throat swaps and immunological samples. The pathological<br />

thus differences inherently controlled betweenfor the in the two mortality groups analyses. whichTest could for explain<br />

pictures of the dead children were quite different and the<br />

proportionality differences of hazard rates were computed using Schoenfeldt<br />

residuals<br />

deaths the did cluster, between<br />

and<br />

not<br />

by<br />

occur but the thistwo visual<br />

immediately. perhaps groups which<br />

inspection of<br />

Hence, not<br />

the cumulative<br />

itsurprising could explain<br />

is unlikely<br />

risk<br />

that as the mortal<br />

the curves.<br />

Cumulative theity cluster,<br />

children wasbut nothis mortality diedlonger perhaps<br />

of the curves same elevated not surprising<br />

were infection. at the<br />

drawn However, time as the<br />

using the itwhen mortality<br />

was no longer elevated at the time when we collected<br />

Kaplan-Meier may bewe collected<br />

method. speculated throat We swaps that tested the whether and pathogen immunological there weakened were differences the samples. children in the The who age pathologica<br />

throat swaps and immunological samples. The pathological<br />

death died later, in a linear possibly regression by encounter model with on the a new log-transformed pathogen. age.<br />

pictures pictures of the ofdead the children dead children were quite were different quiteand different the and the<br />

When we halted the trial we did not know whether<br />

We<br />

deaths deaths<br />

there tested<br />

did<br />

might interactions<br />

not didoccur not occur immediately. immediately.<br />

be morebetween deaths among baseline<br />

Hence,<br />

children characteristics,<br />

itHence, is unlikely it that is unlikely tha<br />

with whom<br />

season the the children<br />

we hadof children<br />

not enrolment died of died<br />

yet had(rainy theof same<br />

contact. season theinfection. same<br />

However, June infection. to However,<br />

that November, it However, may<br />

was not dry be it may be<br />

the<br />

season case; speculated there December that the<br />

werethat to noMay), pathogen the additional and pathogen admission weakened<br />

early weakened deaths to theneonatal children<br />

among the nursery who<br />

the children who<br />

before died<br />

children died later, enrolment later, possibly<br />

recruited possibly by by<br />

in<br />

Wald encounter<br />

October by test encounter statistics. with a new<br />

and November.<br />

We with analysed pathogen. aThe neweffect<br />

problem<br />

apparently had passed. However, restart<br />

intervention<br />

pathogen.<br />

modification When weby halted investigating the trial the we homogeneity did not know of the whether effect of<br />

When we<br />

might bein more the<br />

halted<br />

different<br />

the<br />

deaths among categories<br />

trial we<br />

children of<br />

did<br />

the with suspected<br />

not know whethe<br />

whom<br />

the trial. Though this may have been due to a pathogen<br />

modifier, wethere had not also might yet by Wald had be contact. test more statistics. deaths However, Effect among that modifiers was children not considered thewith whom<br />

were case; we age there had at and were not place yet noof additional had enrolment, contact. early place However, deaths of residence, among that birth the was not the<br />

weight, Table 4head Causes circumference, of death by MUAC, intervention and maternal and ageMUAC, at death<br />

children recruited in October and November. The problem<br />

apparently had passed. However, we did Deaths not after restart 2<br />

age,<br />

case; there were no additional early deaths among the<br />

parity, schooling, and Deaths socioeconomic within status.<br />

children recruited first 2 months in October andmonths November. of age The prob<br />

the trial. Though this may have been due to a pathogen<br />

lem apparently VAShad passed. OPV However, VAS we OPV did not restar<br />

Resp. the diseases trial. Though 5 this may 1 have been 2 due to 1 a pathogen<br />

Table 4 Causes of death by intervention and age at death<br />

Diarrhoea 2 0 0 0<br />

Deaths within<br />

Deaths after 2<br />

Sepsis Table 4 Causes1 first of2death months0 by intervention 0months of and age1<br />

age at death<br />

Kernicterus VAS 0 OPV 1<br />

Deaths within<br />

VAS 0 OPV 0<br />

Deaths after 2<br />

Chickenpox Resp. diseases 05 first 20 1 months 02 months 1 of age<br />

Unknown* Diarrhoea 32 VAS 20 OPV 10 VAS 30<br />

OPV<br />

Total Sepsis<br />

Resp. diseases<br />

11 1<br />

5<br />

40 1<br />

30 61<br />

2 1<br />

Kernicterus *Three families moved before 0 autopsy, and1 a diagnosis could 0 not be 0<br />

established Diarrhoea in six children. 2 0 0<br />

Chickenpox 0 0 0 1<br />

0<br />

Unknown* Sepsis 3 1 2 0 1 03<br />

1<br />

Total Kernicterus 11 0 4 1 3 06<br />

0<br />

*Three Chickenpox families moved before autopsy, 0 and a diagnosis 0could not be<br />

established in six children.<br />

0 1<br />

Unknown* 3 2 1 3<br />

neonatal 4 <strong>INTENSIVE</strong> <strong>CARE</strong> Vol. 29 No. 4 Fall 2016 Total neonatal <strong>INTENSIVE</strong> 11 <strong>CARE</strong> 4 Vol. XX No. X 3Xxxx XXXX 47 6<br />

• •<br />

*Three families moved before autopsy, and a diagnosis could not be

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!