Airway Assessment

Recommendations

Info

Table 19. El-Ganzouri risk index. El-Ganzouri risk index Score Mouth opening >4cm 0 4cm 1 6cm 0 6-6.5cm 1 90 degrees 0 80-90 degrees 1
Table 20. Arne risk index. Risk factors Points of the exact score Points of the simplified score Previous knowledge of difficult intubation No 0 0 Yes 3.28 10 Pathologies associated with difficult intubation No 0 0 Yes 1.63 5 Clinical symptoms of airway pathology No 0 0 Yes 0.98 3 Inter-incisor gap (IIG) and mandible luxation IIG ≥ 5cm or ML > 0 0 0 3.5 < IG < 5 and ML = 0 1.09 3 IG < 3.5cm and ML < 0 4.12 13 Thyromental distance ≥ 6.5 cm 0 0 < 6.5cm 1.36 4 Maximum range of head and neck movement Above 100° 0 0 90° ± 10° 0.65 2 Below 80° 1.46 5 Modified Mallampati Test Class 1 0 0 Class 2 0.66 2 Class 3 1.93 6 Class 4 2.52 8 Total possible 15.35 48 NAGUIB MODEL This model 62 uses logistic regression and includes thyromental distance, Mallampati score, inter-incisor gap and height. This model is 82.5 per cent sensitive and 85.6 per cent specific with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.90. 27 <strong>Airway</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong>
Page 1 and 2: Airway Assessment Authors: Dr Pierr
Page 3 and 4: Part 1. Introduction This airway as
Page 5 and 6: REFERENCES 1. Yentis SM. Predicting
Page 7 and 8: SUMMARY Preoperative airway assessm
Page 9 and 10: Table 3. Difficult airway screening
Page 11 and 12: PREDICTORS OF DIFFICULT BAG-MASK VE
Page 13 and 14: INCIDENCE OF IMPOSSIBLE MASK VENTIL
Page 15 and 16: DIFFICULT ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION D
Page 17 and 18: Figure 1. A 100 per cent POGO score
Page 19 and 20: When the patient has risk factors,
Page 21 and 22: TONGUE ABNORMALITIES Direct laryngo
Page 23 and 24: Class A B C Position of the lower t
Page 25: Table 18. Wilson risk sum score. Wi
Page 29 and 30: fibreoptic intubation has a finite
Page 31 and 32: 8. Practice guidelines for manageme
Page 33 and 34: 46. Samsoon GL, and Young JR. Diffi
Page 35 and 36: 86. Komatsu R, et al. Ultrasound qu
Page 37 and 38: RE-EXAMINING THE FOUNDATIONS OF AIR
Page 39 and 40: Figure 3. Stylised orientatation of
Page 41 and 42: Figure 5. Retrognathic patient (lef
Page 43 and 44: POSTERIOR COLUMN The original descr
Page 45 and 46: It is postulated that any reduction
Page 47 and 48: 7. Chou HC, Wu TL. A reconsideratio
Page 49 and 50: CHANGING THE PARADIGM: THE NEXT STE
Page 51 and 52: Compression of submandibular struct
Page 53 and 54: Figure 5. Passage of a bevel-tipped
Page 55 and 56: Figure 7. Predicted alteration in p
Page 57 and 58: Figure 9. Accentuation of primary a
Page 59 and 60: LARYNGEAL MASK-FACILITATED INTUBATI
Page 61 and 62: 17. Sanuki T, Sugioka S, Hirokane M
Page 63: 54. Law-Koune JD, Liu N, Szekely B,

Airway Assessment

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?