08.12.2012 Views

Monday, 1 September 2008 - European Heart Journal

Monday, 1 September 2008 - European Heart Journal

Monday, 1 September 2008 - European Heart Journal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

266 Resuscitation resuscitated! / Risk assessment: strengths and weaknesses<br />

resuscitated from cardiac arrest and those without this complication. The higher<br />

mortality rate among resuscitated patients is explained by noncardiac complications.<br />

RISK ASSESSMENT:<br />

STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES<br />

1762 Aortic augmentation index: reference values and<br />

association with known cardiovascular risk factors in a<br />

Danish population<br />

J.H. Janner1 , N.S. Godtfredsen2 , P. Lange1 ,J.Vestbo1 ,E.Prescott2 .<br />

1Hvidovre University Hospital, Cardiology and Respiratory Medicine,<br />

Copenhagen, Denmark; 2Bispebjerg University Hospital, Department of<br />

Respiratory Medicine, Copenhagen, Denmark<br />

Background: It has been proposed that aortic augmentation index (AIx) – a measure<br />

of arterial wave reflection – can be used as a surrogate measure of arterial<br />

stiffness. In a selected patient group (end stage renal disease) AIx has been<br />

shown to be a predictor of all-cause mortality. AIx has also been shown to predict<br />

cardiovascular events in patients with hypertension and patients undergoing PCI.<br />

Studies of reference values of AIx are scarce.<br />

Objective: 1) To report reference values of AIx in a population at low risk of CVD<br />

according to <strong>Heart</strong>score. 2) To investigate the association between AIx and known<br />

CVD risk factors in a large cohort of the Danish population.<br />

Methods: This population-study is based on 4700 subjects from the Copenhagen<br />

City <strong>Heart</strong> Study. In those with the lowest risk of CVD as defined by <strong>Heart</strong>score<br />

we analysed AIx adjusted for heart-rate and its dependency of sex, age and<br />

height using linear regression. Multivariate linear regression was used to examine<br />

the association between AIx and the following risk factors for CVD – systolic<br />

and diastolic blood pressure, total-cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol,<br />

triglycerides, high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), smoking status, years of<br />

smoking, alcohol consumption, diabetes, medication for hypertension, heart disease<br />

or high cholesterol, physical inactivity, familiar history of CVD and education.<br />

All analyses were stratified by sex.<br />

Results: AIx was positively associated with age and negatively with height in<br />

those with lowest risk of CVD in the following manner: Woman: AIx = 26.56 +<br />

0.76 (age) – 0.004 (age 2 ) – 0.19 (height (cm)). Men: AIx = 59.52 + 0.42 (age)<br />

– 0.38 (height (cm)). We found increasing AIx with increasing risk of CVD as<br />

defined by the <strong>Heart</strong>score index. In the multivariate analyses AIx was positively<br />

associated with systolic and diastolic blood pressure, hs-CRP and current smoking<br />

and – negatively with weight for both sexes, and positively associated with<br />

total cholesterol for men only. AIx was not associated with other CVD risk factors,<br />

including diabetes.<br />

Conclusions: We propose a novel equation including age, height and sex to<br />

calculate reference values for AIx - based on a large general population sample<br />

with low risk of CVD. AIx is highly dependent on age and both systolic and<br />

diastolic blood pressure, positively associated with hs-CRP and current smoking.<br />

This study is the largest to date evaluating the association between AIx and<br />

known CVD risk factors. We plan to examine AIx as independent predictor for cardiovascular<br />

events and mortality in the Copenhagen City <strong>Heart</strong> Study – a cohort<br />

with low risk of CVD.<br />

1763 Increased cardiovascular mortality in women with<br />

normal weight obesity<br />

A. Romero-Corral1 , V.K. Somers1 , S. Boarin 2 , J. Sierra-Johnson3 ,<br />

Y. Korenfeld4 , J. Korinek4 , G. Parati 5 , F. Lopez-Jimenez1 . 1Mayo Clinic, Cardiovascular, Rochester, United States of America; 2Mayo Clinic and Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Cardiovascular, Milan, Italy; 3Mayo Clinic<br />

and Karolinska Institute, Cardiovascular, Stockholm, Sweden; 4Mayo Clinic,<br />

Cardiovascular, Rochester, United States of America; 5Istituto Auxologico<br />

Italiano, Cardiovascular, Milan, Italy<br />

Background: We hypothesized that subjects with normal weight obesity (NWO),<br />

defined as those with normal BMI but high body fat (BF) content, in whom we<br />

have previously reported a higher prevalence of metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular<br />

(CV) risk factors, are at higher risk for total and CV mortality.<br />

Methods: We analyzed 2,127 subjects ≥ 20 years of age from the Third National<br />

Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) and mortality study with<br />

normal BMI (18.5-24.9 kg/m 2 ), body composition assessment, fasting morning<br />

blood measurements and CV risk factors data. Survival information was available<br />

for all subjects after 8.7 years of follow-up. We divided our sample into three<br />

groups: low BF (35% in women), defined as NWO. We compared total and<br />

CV mortality across groups.<br />

Results: NWO comprised ∼20% of all subjects with a normal BMI. Table displays<br />

the total and CV mortality rate in men and women according to BF. As BF<br />

increased in men, there was a non-significant increased risk for total and CV mortality.<br />

However, as BF increased in women, there was a significant increased risk<br />

for total and CV mortality. When compared to the low BF group, NWO women<br />

showed a trend towards higher total mortality (HR=1.52; 95%CI, 0.83-2.77), and<br />

after adjustment for age, dyslipidemia, hypertension, diabetes, CV disease and<br />

Total and cardiovascular deaths by BF<br />

Men (n=1,1036) Body fat 25% Age and race adjusted<br />

(n=378) (n=400) (n=248) p-value for trend<br />

Total deaths 39 (5.63%) 42 (6.36%) 37 (12.5%) 0.21<br />

Cardiovascular deaths 15 (2.52%) 20 (2.63%) 13 (4.94%) 0.59 †<br />

Women (n=1,101) Body fat 35%<br />

(n=428) (n=427) (n=246)<br />

Total deaths 20 (3.03%) 31 (5.55%) 22 (8.25%) 0.038<br />

Cardiovascular deaths 5 (0.87%) 12 (2.12%) 12 (4.37%)* 0.044 †<br />

*p-value

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!