WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience

<strong>WHO</strong> <strong>recommendations</strong> on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience
are important to healthy pregnant women.
BJOG. 2016;123(4):529–39. doi:10.1111/1471-
0528.13819.
14. <strong>WHO</strong> handbook for guideline development, 2nd
edition. Geneva: World Health Organization;
2014 (http://www.who.int/kms/handbook_2nd_
ed.pdf, accessed 6 October 2016).
15. GRADE [website]. The GRADE Working Group;
2016 (http://gradeworkinggroup.org/, accessed
27 October 2016).
16. GRADE-CERQual [website]. The GRADE-
CERQual Project Group; 2016 (https://cerqual.
org/, accessed 27 October 2016).
17. DECIDE [website]. The DECIDE Project; 2016
(http://www.decide-collaboration.eu/, accessed
27 October 2016).
18. Abalos A, Chamillard M, Diaz V, Tunçalp Ö,
Gülmezoglu AM. Antenatal care for healthy
pregnant women: a mapping of interventions
from existing guidelines to inform the
development of new <strong>WHO</strong> guidance on
antenatal care. BJOG. 2016;123(4):519–28.
doi:10.1111/1471-0528.13820.
19. <strong>WHO</strong>, United Nations Population Fund,
United Nations Children’s Fund. Integrated
Management of Pregnancy and Childbirth.
Pregnancy, childbirth, postpartum and newborn
care: a guide for essential practice, 3rd edition.
Geneva: World Health Organization (<strong>WHO</strong>);
2015 (http://www.who.int/maternal_child_
adolescent/documents/imca-essential-practiceguide/en/,
accessed 26 September 2016).
20. Di Mario S, Basevi V, Gori G, Spettoli D.
What is the effectiveness of antenatal care?
(supplement). Health Evidence Network report.
Copenhagen: <strong>WHO</strong> Regional Office for Europe;
2005 (http://www.euro.who.int/data/assets/
pdf_file/0005/74660/E87997.pdf, accessed
26 September 2016).
21. Essential interventions, commodities and
guidelines for reproductive, maternal, newborn
and child health: a global review of the key
interventions related to reproductive, maternal,
newborn and child health (RMNCH). Geneva:
The Partnership for Maternal, Newborn & Child
Health (PMNCH); 2011 (http://www.who.int/
pmnch/topics/part_publications/essential_
interventions_18_01_2012.pdf, accessed
29 September 2016).
22. Downe S, Finlayson K, Tunçalp Ö, Gülmezoglu
AM. Factors that influence the use of routine
antenatal services by pregnant women: a
qualitative evidence synthesis. Cochrane
Database Syst Rev. 2016;(10):CD012392.
23. Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane
handbook for systematic reviews of
interventions, version 5.1.0 (updated March
2011). The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011
(http://handbook.cochrane.org/, accessed
29 September 2016).
24. Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group.
Pregnancy and Childbirth Group’s Trials Register
[website]. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2016
(http://pregnancy.cochrane.org/pregnancyand-childbirth-groups-trials-register,
accessed
27 October 2016).
25. Walsh D, Downe S. Appraising the quality of
qualitative research. Midwifery. 2006;22(2):108–
19. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2005.05.004.
26. Lewin S, Glenton C, Munthe-Kaas H, Carlsen
B, Colvin CJ, Gülmezoglu AM et al. Using
qualitative evidence in decision making for
health and social interventions: an approach to
assess confidence in findings from qualitative
evidence syntheses (GRADE-CERQual). PLoS
Med. 2015;12(10):e1001895. doi:10.1371/journal.
pmed.1001895.
27. OneHealth Model: intervention treatment
assumptions (draft 28 September). Geneva
and Glastonbury (CT): United Nations
InterAgency Working Group on Costing and
the Futures Institute; 2013 (http://avenirhealth.
org/Download/Spectrum/Manuals/
Intervention%20Assumptions%202013%20
9%2028.pdf, accessed 4 October 2016).
28. <strong>WHO</strong> compendium of innovative health
technologies for low-resource settings,
2011–2014: assistive devices, eHealth
solutions, medical devices, other technologies,
124