- Page 1 and 2: RECOVERY OF HYDROGEN AND HELIUM FRO
- Page 3: ABSTRACT Waste streams of hydrogen
- Page 7 and 8: I also would like to cheer for my f
- Page 9 and 10: 2.2.2.1. Hydriding and Dehydriding
- Page 11 and 12: LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Pressure-
- Page 13 and 14: Figure 34. Pressure profiles under
- Page 15 and 16: 1. INTRODUCTION The focus of this s
- Page 17 and 18: ecause of the difference in partial
- Page 19 and 20: hydrides by dissolving large amount
- Page 21 and 22: hydrogen storage alloy has a specif
- Page 23 and 24: • Insensitivity to poisoning by i
- Page 25 and 26: hydrogen capacity was not reproduci
- Page 27 and 28: showed the lowest plateau pressure
- Page 29 and 30: grain boundaries increases the tota
- Page 31 and 32: These parameters are generally inte
- Page 33 and 34: Figure 4. CaCu5-type P6/mmm structu
- Page 35 and 36: In this study, the addition of Al t
- Page 37 and 38: 2. EXPERIMENTAL 2.1.Chemicals and R
- Page 39 and 40: Figure 5. The high energy Spex 8000
- Page 41 and 42: 2.2.1.1. Hydriding and Dehydriding
- Page 43 and 44: approximately 5 atm, and heating th
- Page 45 and 46: determined by the start and end of
- Page 47 and 48: 450 400 coating thickness (Å) 350
- Page 49 and 50: 3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS 3.1. Hyd
- Page 51 and 52: DSC 111 heat flow/mW Exo 300 Figure
- Page 53 and 54: The thermogram associated with the
- Page 55 and 56:
total time was broken into three 30
- Page 57 and 58:
The VTiNi sample was subjected to d
- Page 59 and 60:
solid solution of hydrogen rather t
- Page 61 and 62:
DSC 111 Heat Flow/mW 180 Exo Figure
- Page 63 and 64:
100 rpm setting, the milling vial w
- Page 65 and 66:
BPR, 400 rpm, 5 minutes) did not re
- Page 67 and 68:
Table 1: Effects of various milling
- Page 69 and 70:
Due to the fast kinetics observed a
- Page 71 and 72:
The mole % Al after milling was les
- Page 73 and 74:
Figure 24: Percent hydrogen capacit
- Page 75 and 76:
the start of the heating period, wh
- Page 77 and 78:
However, it was noted that the part
- Page 79 and 80:
percent hydrogen was decreased. The
- Page 81 and 82:
3.2.2.4. AuPd and Pt Coating on LaN
- Page 83 and 84:
1.0 0.8 (a) (b) Wt. % H absorbed 0.
- Page 85 and 86:
After dehydriding by the sample, th
- Page 87 and 88:
19 18 P (atm) 17 16 15 14 0.74 %Al
- Page 89 and 90:
GC output, arbitrary units 0 5 10 1
- Page 91 and 92:
sample was LaNi 5 . This may indica
- Page 93 and 94:
30 min. 15 min. Intensity (arb. uni
- Page 95 and 96:
After milling the percentages of Al
- Page 97 and 98:
4. CONCLUSIONS This study has been
- Page 99 and 100:
16. Van-Vucht, J.H.N., Kuijpers, F.
- Page 101 and 102:
47. Suryanarayana, C., Progress in