24.11.2016 Views

The State of Circumpolar Walrus Populations

walrusreport

walrusreport

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

60<br />

2014a, b; Lindqvist et al. 2016). <strong>The</strong> genetic placement <strong>of</strong> these walruses in relation to other<br />

Atlantic walruses should be a top research priority. <strong>The</strong>se data should be used to delineate where<br />

in the Russian Arctic the separation between the Atlantic and Pacific walrus subspecies occurs.<br />

Further research on stock structure in the BCS population <strong>of</strong> Pacific walruses is also needed<br />

(Garlich-Miller et al. 2011; USFWS 2014).<br />

Mortality (anthropogenic and natural)<br />

Hunting by humans is the greatest known cause <strong>of</strong> mortality in most areas <strong>of</strong> walrus range within<br />

Canada, Greenland, Russia and the United <strong>State</strong>s. <strong>The</strong> hunting mortality that the different<br />

Atlantic walrus and Pacific walrus populations can sustain is not known. In all areas where<br />

walruses are legally harvested, removal rates are uncertain due to uncertainties in the reported<br />

harvest. This is due to factors such as reporting bias and lack <strong>of</strong> systematic data collection effort.<br />

Even where extensive data on harvests are available, the proportion <strong>of</strong> the population being<br />

harvested is typically uncertain due to biased population estimates. <strong>The</strong>se uncertainties are<br />

further compounded by significant uncertainty in struck and loss rates (animals injured or killed<br />

but not secured) (D.B. Stewart et al. 2014a). <strong>The</strong>re are few estimates for loss rates in subsistence<br />

hunts, and none are recent. Accurate seasonal and habitat specific (e.g., land-based, and over<br />

deep and shallow water) data on struck and lost rates are needed for all hunted populations.<br />

For populations that are not legally harvested (e.g., KS-SBS-NZ population <strong>of</strong> Atlantic walruses;<br />

LVS population <strong>of</strong> Pacific walruses), data on illegal removals (poaching) would be <strong>of</strong> value.<br />

However, the collection <strong>of</strong> data needed to understand abundance and distribution should take<br />

precedence.<br />

<strong>The</strong> natural survival rate <strong>of</strong> walruses is thought to be high, due to their low reproductive rate and<br />

long life span, but this has not been directly estimated (Taylor and Udevitz 2015). Rigorous<br />

survival rate estimates do not exist for any population. Lack <strong>of</strong> this information increases<br />

uncertainty in important population management tools used to predict demography, estimate<br />

abundance, and calculate total allowable removals.<br />

Rates <strong>of</strong> walrus predation by polar bears and killer whales are not well known, nor are rates <strong>of</strong><br />

natural mortality from sources such as disturbance, which can stampede walruses causing<br />

trampling mortality. Efforts to study and monitor walrus behaviour at haulouts (see below) can<br />

provide important data on disturbances. Mortality rates from pathogens and parasites are<br />

generally unknown. <strong>The</strong> susceptibility <strong>of</strong> walruses to viral and bacterial diseases is poorly<br />

understood for both subspecies (e.g., Nielsen et al. 2000, 2001a, 2001b, 2004; Calle et al. 2002;<br />

Phillipa et al 2004). Research could improve understanding <strong>of</strong> potential risk to populations from

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!