Green Plus Issu 14
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
COLUMN<br />
The top 90 companies<br />
that are responsible for<br />
two thirds of our global<br />
carbon emissions<br />
(Source: The Guardian)<br />
We are trapped because the actions that<br />
would be the best chance of averting catastrophe<br />
and would benefit the vast majority – are<br />
extremely threatening to an elite minority<br />
that has a stranglehold over our economy (oil<br />
and gas particularly), political process (that is<br />
lobbied by rich corporations), and our media<br />
outlets. Interestingly from a socialism point of<br />
view, a research from Yales found that people<br />
with strong ‘communitarian’ (incline towards<br />
collective action and social justice) worldviews<br />
accept the scientific consensus on climate<br />
change.<br />
Conversely, those with strong ‘hierarchical’<br />
and ‘individualistic’ (strong support for industry)<br />
worldviews reject the scientific consensus.<br />
It is always easier to deny reality than to<br />
allow our worldview to be shattered. But what<br />
about ‘green technology’ attempts in saving<br />
the world? Ironically, finding new ways to privatize<br />
the commons and profit from disaster is<br />
also what our current system is built to do. The<br />
benefits goes to the ‘climate-ready’ crops producer<br />
such as Monsanto, and big contractors,<br />
insurance companies benefiting through disaster<br />
mitigation projects. What about big companies<br />
and Individuals such as Shell and Richard<br />
<strong>Green</strong>plus TM MARCH 2016<br />
Branson declaring that environmental conservation<br />
is in their agenda? It is nothing more than<br />
a public relations stunt, reflected in their tiny<br />
investment on environmental obligations.<br />
THE CLIMATE CHANGE AND<br />
CAPITALISM PARALLELISM<br />
The scenario is distinctively identical across<br />
the globe. The privatization of the public sphere,<br />
deregulation of the corporate sector, and lower<br />
corporate taxation, paid for with cuts to public<br />
spending. The occupy wall street movement<br />
echoes the real world costs of these policies, the<br />
instability of financial market, the ever widening<br />
rich poor gap, as well as the failing state of<br />
public infrastructure and services. Klein reinforced<br />
her past 15 years of experience by linking<br />
how capitalism has systematically sabotaged<br />
our collective response to climate change, a<br />
happening threat that came knocking just as<br />
this ideology was reaching its zenith.<br />
If one has to look back at the past quarter<br />
century of international negotiations, two<br />
defining process stand out. There will be the<br />
climate process, which struggles and failing<br />
utterly to achieve its goals, and there will be<br />
the corporate globalization process, hammering<br />
victorious milestones, from the first trade<br />
deal between Canada and the United States<br />
(which forms NAFTA) to the creation of World<br />
Trade Organization to the transformation of<br />
large parts of Asia into sprawling free trade<br />
zones, with the latest Trans-Pacific Partnership<br />
Agreement. Both, interestingly began in the<br />
1990s. In mid of 20<strong>14</strong>, the IPCC has also finally<br />
acknowledged the reality of growing share of<br />
total anthropogenic CO2 emissions is released<br />
in the manufacture of products that are traded<br />
across international borders.<br />
A MORAL ISSUE – SOLVING THIS<br />
SOLVING MORE<br />
Climate destabilization is a moral issue transcended<br />
through our current economic system.<br />
Between 1990 and 1998, more than 94 percent<br />
of the world’s biggest natural disasters occurred<br />
in developing world, places with weak and poor<br />
infrastructure, where people are not responsible<br />
for the majority of the carbon emissions.<br />
Instead, 80 percent of the world’s emissions<br />
lies with just 20 percent of the inhabitants of<br />
the world’s wealthiest nations. Research also<br />
suggests that the climate crisis is fuelled by 90<br />
companies (mostly oil and gas), which between<br />
them produced nearly two thirds of the greenhouse<br />
gas emissions since the dawning of industrial<br />
age.<br />
The culprits extend to huge industries such<br />
as aviation, automobile and even military,<br />
which are decided by consumers like us. We<br />
know that various social issues are caused and<br />
amplified by wealth inequality and injustice (at<br />
all scales, from individuals to countries) which<br />
directly contradicts humanity values and religious<br />
teachings. Fixing this moral issue we<br />
know, is not merely a chance to respond to the<br />
climate crisis but it restores hope and progress<br />
of the human race as a whole. As what James<br />
Martin has rightly pointed out in his book<br />
“The Meaning of the 21st Century”, we are at<br />
the junction of our civilization in determining<br />
our future.<br />
THE GREAT WAKE-UP CALL<br />
So how do we do it? Definitely not the next<br />
generation of ‘clean’ nuclear power plants that<br />
take another decade of research, not some giant<br />
carbon dioxide sucking machine, not slowly<br />
awaiting our “green companies” or “green<br />
Messiahs”. We simply do not have the time. But<br />
instead, people power.<br />
59