09.12.2016 Views

Green Plus Issu 14

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

COLUMN<br />

The top 90 companies<br />

that are responsible for<br />

two thirds of our global<br />

carbon emissions<br />

(Source: The Guardian)<br />

We are trapped because the actions that<br />

would be the best chance of averting catastrophe<br />

and would benefit the vast majority – are<br />

extremely threatening to an elite minority<br />

that has a stranglehold over our economy (oil<br />

and gas particularly), political process (that is<br />

lobbied by rich corporations), and our media<br />

outlets. Interestingly from a socialism point of<br />

view, a research from Yales found that people<br />

with strong ‘communitarian’ (incline towards<br />

collective action and social justice) worldviews<br />

accept the scientific consensus on climate<br />

change.<br />

Conversely, those with strong ‘hierarchical’<br />

and ‘individualistic’ (strong support for industry)<br />

worldviews reject the scientific consensus.<br />

It is always easier to deny reality than to<br />

allow our worldview to be shattered. But what<br />

about ‘green technology’ attempts in saving<br />

the world? Ironically, finding new ways to privatize<br />

the commons and profit from disaster is<br />

also what our current system is built to do. The<br />

benefits goes to the ‘climate-ready’ crops producer<br />

such as Monsanto, and big contractors,<br />

insurance companies benefiting through disaster<br />

mitigation projects. What about big companies<br />

and Individuals such as Shell and Richard<br />

<strong>Green</strong>plus TM MARCH 2016<br />

Branson declaring that environmental conservation<br />

is in their agenda? It is nothing more than<br />

a public relations stunt, reflected in their tiny<br />

investment on environmental obligations.<br />

THE CLIMATE CHANGE AND<br />

CAPITALISM PARALLELISM<br />

The scenario is distinctively identical across<br />

the globe. The privatization of the public sphere,<br />

deregulation of the corporate sector, and lower<br />

corporate taxation, paid for with cuts to public<br />

spending. The occupy wall street movement<br />

echoes the real world costs of these policies, the<br />

instability of financial market, the ever widening<br />

rich poor gap, as well as the failing state of<br />

public infrastructure and services. Klein reinforced<br />

her past 15 years of experience by linking<br />

how capitalism has systematically sabotaged<br />

our collective response to climate change, a<br />

happening threat that came knocking just as<br />

this ideology was reaching its zenith.<br />

If one has to look back at the past quarter<br />

century of international negotiations, two<br />

defining process stand out. There will be the<br />

climate process, which struggles and failing<br />

utterly to achieve its goals, and there will be<br />

the corporate globalization process, hammering<br />

victorious milestones, from the first trade<br />

deal between Canada and the United States<br />

(which forms NAFTA) to the creation of World<br />

Trade Organization to the transformation of<br />

large parts of Asia into sprawling free trade<br />

zones, with the latest Trans-Pacific Partnership<br />

Agreement. Both, interestingly began in the<br />

1990s. In mid of 20<strong>14</strong>, the IPCC has also finally<br />

acknowledged the reality of growing share of<br />

total anthropogenic CO2 emissions is released<br />

in the manufacture of products that are traded<br />

across international borders.<br />

A MORAL ISSUE – SOLVING THIS<br />

SOLVING MORE<br />

Climate destabilization is a moral issue transcended<br />

through our current economic system.<br />

Between 1990 and 1998, more than 94 percent<br />

of the world’s biggest natural disasters occurred<br />

in developing world, places with weak and poor<br />

infrastructure, where people are not responsible<br />

for the majority of the carbon emissions.<br />

Instead, 80 percent of the world’s emissions<br />

lies with just 20 percent of the inhabitants of<br />

the world’s wealthiest nations. Research also<br />

suggests that the climate crisis is fuelled by 90<br />

companies (mostly oil and gas), which between<br />

them produced nearly two thirds of the greenhouse<br />

gas emissions since the dawning of industrial<br />

age.<br />

The culprits extend to huge industries such<br />

as aviation, automobile and even military,<br />

which are decided by consumers like us. We<br />

know that various social issues are caused and<br />

amplified by wealth inequality and injustice (at<br />

all scales, from individuals to countries) which<br />

directly contradicts humanity values and religious<br />

teachings. Fixing this moral issue we<br />

know, is not merely a chance to respond to the<br />

climate crisis but it restores hope and progress<br />

of the human race as a whole. As what James<br />

Martin has rightly pointed out in his book<br />

“The Meaning of the 21st Century”, we are at<br />

the junction of our civilization in determining<br />

our future.<br />

THE GREAT WAKE-UP CALL<br />

So how do we do it? Definitely not the next<br />

generation of ‘clean’ nuclear power plants that<br />

take another decade of research, not some giant<br />

carbon dioxide sucking machine, not slowly<br />

awaiting our “green companies” or “green<br />

Messiahs”. We simply do not have the time. But<br />

instead, people power.<br />

59

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!