01.01.2017 Views

MEMORANDUM

n?u=RePEc:hhs:osloec:2016_018&r=hpe

n?u=RePEc:hhs:osloec:2016_018&r=hpe

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Cournot, Walras, Edgeworth, and a few others. Thus the course should not be mathematics<br />

taught to economists but rather on the “mathematical theory of economics.” 200<br />

But why did Schumpeter take this initiative? The reason was undoubtedly<br />

Schumpeter’s deep involvement in the founding of the Econometric Society, a purpose of<br />

which was to promote mathematics within economics. Some would even say it was the<br />

purpose. 201 The Econometric Society was founded in December 1930; during 1931 the<br />

Council of the Society invited a list of about 175 names as charter members of the Society.<br />

Most of the careful approval of names on the list was done by the unofficial troika of the<br />

Council, namely Irving Fisher, Schumpeter and Ragnar Frisch. The Harvard economics<br />

department was not known for having any person with mathematical skills. When the<br />

troika in the summer of 1931 discussed by letter possible charter members from Harvard<br />

each of them had found one but only one, name to propose from the economics department.<br />

Fisher’s candidate was Thomas N. Carver, Schumpeter proposed Frank W. Taussig, while<br />

Frisch suggested John D. Black. After noting the outcome the two younger men yielded in<br />

deference to Fisher, who was exasperated at the thought of having no charter member from<br />

the Harvard economics department, and they put both Carver and Taussig on the list. 202<br />

Leontief was, as mentioned above, informed shortly before he left Europe in August 1931<br />

that had been elected as charter member.<br />

Hence, Schumpeter’s initiative was meant to remedy the situation with regard to<br />

mathematics in the teaching of economics. The Committee proposed to start already from<br />

the fall term 1933. A course titled “Introduction to the Mathematical Treatment of<br />

Economic Theory” was offered as half-course to be given by Schumpeter “and other<br />

members of the department”. The same course was offered again in 1934 but accompanied<br />

by another half-course titled “Mathematical Economics” to be given by E.B. Wilson. From<br />

the third year Schumpeter’s course was taken over by Leontief, who had assisted<br />

Schumpeter the previous years. 203 Schumpeter thus saw the need to promote mathematics<br />

in economics at Harvard. Did it work? Solow observed the terrain in 1941and asserted in a<br />

retrospective article that, “[t]he learning of mathematics was frowned upon by the Harvard<br />

economics department.” 204<br />

200 http://www.irwincollier.com/harvard-mathematical-economics-1933-1937/ and Swedberg (1991,<br />

p.23).<br />

201 See Bjerkholt (2017 forthcoming).<br />

202 See Bjerkholt (1998, p.41). Harvard had, however, an outstanding charter member in Edwin<br />

Bidwell Wilson, professor at Harvard but not in the economics department.<br />

203 See http://www.irwincollier.com/harvard-mathematical-economics-1933-1937/<br />

204 Solow (1998, p.300). Solow added: “In 1945, Wassily was teaching the first-year graduate<br />

course in economic theory, as well as a more advanced graduate course in mathematical economics.<br />

These were…the only courses at Harvard in which economics was treated rigorously.”<br />

86

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!