1250119847
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
A CLOSER LOOK AT A MORAL CONUNDRUM<br />
Habeebie Saif,<br />
You will have come across a lot of Muslims who shake their heads at the state of the Muslim world<br />
and mutter the words “If only people were proper Muslims, then none of this would be happening.” I<br />
have heard this type of utterance so many times over the course of my life. It is used when criticizing<br />
corruption in Muslim countries, or pointing out the spread of “moral” corruption. It is also used by<br />
those who promote various forms of Islamic rule. The most famous example of this was the slogan<br />
“Islam Is the Solution,” which was used by the Muslim Brotherhood political-religious party in Egypt<br />
throughout its long history there.<br />
I always used to wonder what the problem was if Islam was the solution. But, of course, this is<br />
precisely the point they were making. They were saying that any problem that we face in life, from<br />
personal to political, from moral to economic, is solvable by being better Muslims.<br />
The Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood—a religious political party founded in 1928—took this<br />
approach to the extreme, and did not even really spend much time thinking about how they would use<br />
political power, or even what political power was for. This is perhaps the reason why they then lost<br />
power in Egypt almost as quickly as they got hold of it in 2012.<br />
Let’s be honest. The slogan was a brilliant one. Lots of people believed in it. Lots of people still<br />
believe in it. When I was younger I believed in it wholeheartedly. But something in me changed over<br />
the years. I will explain why it is possible to be a devout and pious Muslim without needing to<br />
believe that Islam Is the Solution in every case.<br />
One of the most extreme examples of the idea that Islam Is the Solution can be found in the<br />
appearance of ISIS in 2014 in Syria and Iraq. Deep down inside, the argument that is being made is<br />
that all the most glorious periods in Islamic history—the conquests, the empires, the intellectual<br />
achievement, the wealth—occurred under what seems to have been Islamic rule. Therefore, if we<br />
want to acquire this past glory in the modern era, we need to impose a system of Islamic rule that<br />
covers every aspect of life. Why would this be logical? If a little Islam is good, then more Islam is<br />
better. And if more Islam is better, then complete Islam must be best. Who in today’s Muslim world<br />
would be prepared to argue with this position?<br />
Let’s look at ISIS then and see what problems this approach might bring and what solutions it