14.02.2017 Views

THE ULTIMATE ANGLING BUCKET LIST

7DoHoXxkA

7DoHoXxkA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The higher the combined score, the better the water quality. So animals which need high levels of<br />

dissolved oxygen and pristine conditions, such as mayflies and stoneflies, score higher than species<br />

which can tolerate very low dissolved oxygen levels and gross pollution.<br />

Organic pollution tolerant animals include chironomid midge larvae and tubificid worms, both of which<br />

have the ability to store oxygen in their bodies using haemoglobin, which is the reason why, like blood,<br />

they are bright red. And accordingly there are all measures of tolerance in between such as water louse,<br />

freshwater shrimps, beetle larvae, and the rest.<br />

Pollutants fall in to two basic categories – those which are of themselves toxic, such as cyanide, and<br />

those which suffocate such as raw sewage.<br />

Not suffocation in the sense of clogging up an animals gills, though that can happen with some fine<br />

particulate materials in suspension. More a case of suffocation by virtue of being organic in nature and<br />

providing 'food' for the decomposer network such as bacteria, which then explode in numbers and<br />

therefore respiration loading, in turn depriving other animals of dissolved oxygen to take from the water<br />

to be able to breath.<br />

Under normal circumstances, the number of bacteria present at any given aquatic location will be in<br />

balance with the environment, where they are sustained by the decomposition of dead animals and plant<br />

material brought about by natural causes.<br />

Put an organic pollutant into the water such as silage liquor, or milk from dairy washings, both of which<br />

are hundreds of times more polluting than raw sewage, and you can very quickly have a major situation<br />

on your hands.<br />

Bacteria reproduce by splitting themselves into two units which each 'half' can again do every twenty<br />

to thirty minutes, dependant on species. Due to food availability, any given environment can only<br />

support so many bacteria, which is what keeps their numbers in check. Suddenly increase that food<br />

supply and you trigger a population explosion.<br />

For ease of calculation, let's say that bacteria divide in response to increased food availability every<br />

thirty minutes. One bacteria becomes two, then becomes four, and so on. At that rate, in ten hours a<br />

single bacteria can result in excess of one million offspring.<br />

Now imagine them all doing that at the same time. Overnight there will be literally billions of the things,<br />

and all requiring oxygen to survive, which deprives everything else in the water of the ability to breath.<br />

Fish can in theory swim away from the<br />

problem, though rapid onset inputs<br />

taking them by surprise, coupled to<br />

their inability to 'think' the problem<br />

through and make their escape, often<br />

sees them taken out anyway.<br />

Invertebrates on the other hand can't<br />

escape, which is what makes them such<br />

a vital source of data to present to the<br />

courts.<br />

Milk – one of the most potent organic pollutants there is<br />

But why is milk classed as an extreme<br />

aquatic pollutant. It's a food, and it's<br />

exactly that designation that makes it<br />

so lethal in this context. Milk has<br />

evolved to be quickly broken down for<br />

nourishment and growth, therefore<br />

540

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!