11.12.2012 Views

lcc liberal arts studies / 2010 volume iii - LCC International University

lcc liberal arts studies / 2010 volume iii - LCC International University

lcc liberal arts studies / 2010 volume iii - LCC International University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

78<br />

URSULA GLIENECKE / REACTIONS ON CULTURAL AND RELIGIOUS PLURALISM<br />

The challenge of the diversity and plurality of religions has caused a shift in<br />

theological reflection upon the relevance of other religions. Whereas in the past<br />

Christianity has had a habit of feeling superior to other faiths, not until very recently,<br />

only a small number of people had more than a faint (and often a distorted)<br />

knowledge about them. As long as the world's religious heritage was practically<br />

unknown, it was much easier to believe that the Christian revelation was<br />

unparalleled and unique in all respects. The whole situation has changed<br />

profoundly, as the knowledge of other traditions “increased in proportion to the<br />

development of scholarly sciences such as anthropology, sociology of religion,<br />

history of religions and oriental <strong>studies</strong>” (D'Costa, 1986, p. 2). The evidence of<br />

millions of people finding spiritual strength, comfort and moral and theological<br />

guidance in their faiths (Samartha, 1991, p. 192) for centuries as well as the<br />

holiness encountered in the others have since prompted a revision of earlier views.<br />

Certain sections of world Christianity have made an effort to develop a new<br />

way of thinking about other religions. The most obvious examples are the<br />

documents of the Second Vatican Council of the Roman Catholic Church and the<br />

new approach to inter-religious dialogue and collaboration suggested by the World<br />

Council of Churches. They spent the latter half of the twentieth century deepening<br />

their understanding of other cultures, improving their relationship and dialogue with<br />

believers of other religions and pursuing social justice. New appreciation and sense<br />

of commonality was born: “We recognise as part of the one Truth that sense of<br />

Majesty of God and the consequent reverence in worship, which are conspicuous in<br />

Islam, the deep sympathy for the world's sorrow and unselfish search for the way of<br />

escape, which are the heart of Buddhism; the desire for contact with ultimate reality<br />

conceived as spiritual, which is prominent in Hinduism; the belief in a moral order of<br />

the universe and consequent insistence on moral conduct, which are included by<br />

Confucianism” (Report of the Jerusalem Meeting of the IMC, 1928, p. 491). At the<br />

same time the evangelical faction further developed their exclusivist position<br />

regarding the possibility of salvation for non-Christians [as impossible] and devised<br />

strategies to evangelise the whole world as soon as possible. Since the theological<br />

difference underlying the split within Protestantism has never been settled, the<br />

conflict has lost nothing of its initial vigour.<br />

Three Basic Views on Religious Pluralism<br />

When it comes to the relationship between religions and their competing truth<br />

claims, three basic positions are known. They are called exclusivism, inclusivism<br />

and pluralism. Stephen B. Bevans and Roger P. Schroeder describe the current<br />

<strong>LCC</strong> / LIBERAL ARTS STUDIES / <strong>2010</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!