12.03.2017 Views

SOYBEAN RESEARCH

Soybean-Research-14(2)-2016

Soybean-Research-14(2)-2016

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

straw and seed yields of soybean were<br />

recorded on the basis of experimental<br />

plot and expressed as ton per ha.<br />

The indicators of competitive<br />

relationship, namely Land Equivalent<br />

ratio (LER) (Mead and Willey, 1980),<br />

Land Equivalent Coefficient (LEC)<br />

(Adetiloye et al., 1983) and Aggressivity<br />

(Agg) (Willey, 1979) were calculated as<br />

follows.<br />

LER = (Y ab / Y aa) + (Y ba / Y bb), where Y aa<br />

- Pure stand yield of crop a (corn),<br />

Y bb - Pure stand yield of crop b<br />

(soybean), Y ab - Intercrop yield of<br />

crop a (corn) and Y ba = Intercrop<br />

yield of crop b (soybean).<br />

LEC = L a x L b, where La - relative yield of<br />

crop a (corn) and L b - relative<br />

yield of crop b (soybean)<br />

Agg = A ab = [Y ab / (Y aa x Z ab)] – [Y ba / (Y bb<br />

x Z ba)] ; A ba = [Y ba / (Y bb x Z ba)] –<br />

[Y ab / (Y aa x Z ab)], where, Y aa -<br />

Pure stand yield of crop a (corn);<br />

Y bb - Pure stand yield of crop b<br />

(soybean); Y ab - Intercrop yield of<br />

crop a (corn); Y ba - Intercrop yield<br />

of crop b (soybean); Z ab - The<br />

respective proportion of crop a in<br />

the intercropping system (corn);<br />

Z ba - The respective proportion of<br />

crop b in the intercropping system<br />

(soybean)<br />

Economical benefit (US$) was<br />

calculated as a difference between total<br />

net returns from intercropping and solid<br />

crops utilizing the prevailing prices of<br />

corn grains and soybean seeds<br />

(Anonymous, 2014) Net returns were<br />

calculated by subtraction the sum of fixed<br />

cost of corn plus variable costs of both<br />

crops. Analysis of variance of the<br />

obtained results of each season was<br />

performed. The homogeneity test was<br />

conducted of error mean squares and<br />

accordingly, the combined analysis of the<br />

two experimental seasons was also<br />

carried out. The measured variables were<br />

analyzed by ANOVA using MSTATC<br />

statistical package (Freed, 1991). Mean<br />

comparisons were performed using the<br />

east significant differences (L.S.D) test<br />

with a significance level of 5% (Gomez<br />

and Gomez, 1984).<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

Seed yield and its attributes<br />

Ridge width: Intercepted light intensity<br />

within soybean plants, plant height,<br />

number of branches per plant, pod and<br />

seed yields per plant, 100 seed weight,<br />

biological, straw and seed yields per ha<br />

and harvest index, as well as, corn grain<br />

yield per ha were influenced significantly<br />

by ridge width in the combined data<br />

across 2013 and 2014 seasons (Tables 1, 2<br />

and 3). Ridge width of 70 cm increased<br />

significantly intercepted light intensity<br />

within soybean canopy, within soybean<br />

canopy, number of branches per plant,<br />

pod and seed yields per plant, 100 seed<br />

weight, biological, straw and seed yields<br />

per ha compared to the other ridge<br />

widths. Clearly, decreasing ridge width<br />

from 80 to 70 cm increased biological,<br />

straw and seed yields per ha by 7.25, 6.98<br />

and 8.76 per cent, respectively. Also,<br />

increasing ridge width from 60 to 70 cm<br />

increased biological, straw and seed<br />

yields per ha by 10.28, 8.41 and 18.69 per<br />

cent, respectively (Tables 1, 2 and 3). It is<br />

noticed that there were non-significant<br />

18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!