SOYBEAN RESEARCH

Recommendations

Info

REFERENCES Abdel-Galil A M, Abdel-Wahab T I and Abdel-Wahab Sh I. 2014a. Productivity of four soybean varieties as affected by intercropping with corn planting geometry. Soybean Research 12(1): 36– 58. Abdel-Galil A M, Abdel-Wahab Sh I and Abdel-Wahab T I. 2014b. Compatibility of some maize and soybean varieties for intercropping under sandy soil conditions. Proceedings of 1 st International Conference ‗Soycon 2014‘ on Soybean Research, 22 – 24 February, 2014, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India., Ablett G R, Beversdorf W D and Dirks V A. 1991. Row spacing and seeding rate performance of indeterminate, semideterminate, and determinate soybean. Journal of Production Agriculture 4: 391–5. Adetiloye P O, Ezedinma F O C and Okigbo B N. 1983. A land equivalent coefficient concept for the evaluation of competitive and productive interactions on simple complex mixtures. Ecological Modelling 19: 27– 39. Anonymous. 2014. Bulletin of Statistical Cost Production and Net Return, "Summer and Nili Field Crops and Vegetables and Fruit", Agriculture Statistics and Economic Sector, Ministry of Egyptian Agriculture and Land Reclamation, Part (2), August 2014. Chang J H. 1974. Radiation Balance, Climatic and Agriculture. An Ecological Survey, pp. 4 – 22, Aldine Publishing Company, Chicago, Illinois, USA. Clipson N J W, Edwards S J, Hall J F, Leach C K, Rayns F W and Weston G D. 1994. Crop Productivity, published on behalf of: Open University and University of Greenwish (Formerly Thames Polytechnic), Avery Hill Road, Eltham, London SE92HB, 5 p. De Bruin J L and Pedersen P. 2008. Effect of row spacing and seeding rate on soybean yield. Agronomy Journal 100: 704 – 710. El-Shamy Moshira A, Abdel-Wahab T I, Abdel-Wahab Sh I and Ragheb S B. 2015. Advantages of intercropping soybean with maize under two maize plant distributions and three mineral nitrogen fertilizer rates. Advances in Bioscience Bioengineering 3(4): 30 – 48. Freed R D. 1991. MSTATC Microcomputer Statistical Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA. Gomez K A and Gomez A A. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research, 2 nd ed. John Willey and Sons, Toronto, ON, Canada. Kiniry J R, Jones C A, O'Toole J C, Blanchet R, Cabelguenne M and Spanel D A. 1989. Radiation-use efficiency in biomass accumulation prior to grainfilling for five grain-crop species. Field Crops Research 20: 51–64. Leuschen W E, Ford J H, Evans S D, Kanne B K, Hoverstad T R, Randall G W, Orf J H, and Hicks D R. 1992. Tillage, row spacing, and planting date effects on soybean following corn and wheat. Journal of Production Agriculture 5(2): 254–60. Mead R and Willey R W. 1980. The concept of a land equivalent ratio and advantages in yields from intercropping. Experimental Agriculture 16: 217–28. Mellendorf N E. 2011. Soybean growth and yield response to interplant competition relief in various plant density environments. M Sc Thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois. 30
Metwally A A. 1999. Intensive copping system in the battle against food crises. Proceedings of 1 st Conference on Recent Technology, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, 27–29 November, 11: 333 – 341, Egypt. Metwally A A, Shafik M M, EL-Habbak K E and Abdel-Wahab Sh I. 2009. Step forward for increasing intercropped soybean yield with maize. The 4 th Conference on Recent Technologies in Agriculture, 3–5 November, Cairo University, Egypt 2: 256–69, Noureldin Nemat A, Hassan M Z, Hassaan R K and Abdel-Wahab Sh I. 2002. Performance of some soybean genotypes in sandy soil as influenced by some abiotic stresses. I. Effect on vegetative growth characteristics. Annals of Agricultural Science, Ain Shams Univ., Cairo, Egypt 47(1): 191– 207. Oriade Caleb A, Dillon Carl R, Vories E D and Bohanan M E. 1997. An economic analysis of alternative cropping and row spacing systems for soybean production. Journal of Prodduction Agriculture 10(4): 619–24. Porter P M, Lauer J G, Lueschen W E, Ford J H, Hoverstad T R, Oplinger E S and Crookston R K. 1997. Environment affects the corn and soybean rotation effect. Agronomy Journal 89: 442–9. Sayed Galal Jr, Abdalla M M F and Metwally A A. 1983. Intensifying land and nutrient equivalent ratios by intercropping corn and soybean in Egypt: Soybean in tropical and subtropical cropping systems. Proceedings of Symposium, Tsukubo, Japan, pp. 101–6. Sivakumar M V K and Virmani S M. 1980. Growth and resource use of maize, pigeonpea and maize/pigeonpea intercrop in an operational research watershed. Experimental Agriculture 16: 377–86. White J W and Warrington I J. 1988. Temperature and light integral effects on growth and flowering of hybrid Geranium. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 113: 354 – 359. Willey R W. 1979. Intercropping its importance and research needs. Part I. Competition and yield advantage. Field Crops Abstract 32: 1–10. 31
Page 1 and 2: ISSN 0973-1830 Volume 14, Number 2
Page 3 and 4: SOYBEAN RESEARCH ISSN 0973-1830 Vol
Page 5 and 6: Soybean Research 14(2): 01-13 (2016
Page 7 and 8: Table 1. Nutrient composition (valu
Page 9 and 10: 100-green seed weight (49.9 g) and
Page 11 and 12: Training was provided through NGO p
Page 13 and 14: estimated using combined analysis.
Page 15 and 16: AGS 447 and AGS 457 in a taste surv
Page 17 and 18: Takahashi Y and Ohyama T. 2011. Pro
Page 19 and 20: eached to about 81,4435 ha in 2013
Page 21 and 22: 2. Soybean seeds were sown in both
Page 23 and 24: Table 1. Effect of ridge width, cro
Page 25 and 26: Table 3. Effect of ridge width, cro
Page 27 and 28: and seed yields per ha were affecte
Page 29 and 30: number of branches per plant, pod a
Page 31 and 32: cv. Giza 35 to increase dry matter
Page 33: increased total and net returns com
Page 37 and 38: (Salvagiotti et al., 2009). Biologi
Page 39 and 40: Table 1. Effect of land configurati
Page 41 and 42: increasing levels of nitrogen and t
Page 45 and 46: conditions (Ruiz-Lozano et al., 200
Page 47 and 48: of 34 0 C and relative humidity 80
Page 49 and 50: Nodule N (%) Grain yield g/plant) N
Page 51 and 52: 140 120 100 Nodules/plant Nodule dr
Page 53 and 54: of AMF, which necessitates experime
Page 55 and 56: Biermann B and Linderman R G. 1981.
Page 57 and 58: Tabatabai M A and J M Bremner. 1969
Page 59 and 60: N:P 2O 5:K per ha (Patil and Purani
Page 61 and 62: available nitrogen content was reco
Page 63 and 64: lowest value in control (Table 2).
Page 65 and 66: the crop. These results corroborate
Page 69 and 70: the use of a variety by any person
Page 71 and 72: objection is received, the variety
Page 73 and 74: Table 1 contd. S. No. Name of varie
Page 75 and 76: Table 2. DUS Characteristics of pro
Page 77 and 78: Table 2. Contd S. No. Varieties DUS
Page 79 and 80: and are easily available. The varie
Page 83 and 84: Table 2. Estimates of variability p
Page 85 and 86:
Table 4. Phenotypic path coefficien
Page 87 and 88:
Shivakumar M, Basavaraja G T, Salim
Page 89 and 90:
available phosphorus (24.89 and 23.
Page 91 and 92:
attributes may be the result of red
Page 93 and 94:
Soybean Research 14(2): 89-96 (2016
Page 95 and 96:
productivity. This will help increa
Page 97 and 98:
Growth rate The analysis on growth
Page 99 and 100:
Table 5. Estimates of variability i
Page 101 and 102:
Society for Soybean Research and De
Page 103 and 104:
MS must be original and contribute
Page 105 and 106:
Short research notes They should no
show all

SOYBEAN RESEARCH

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?