SOYBEAN RESEARCH

Recommendations

Info

Table 2. Effect of ridge width, cropping systems, soybean cultivars and their interactions on pod and seed yields per plant, 100 – seed weight and biological yield per ha at harvest, combined data across 2013 and 2014 seasons Traits Pod yield (g/plant) Seed yield (g/plant) 100 seed weight (g) Biological yield (ton/ha) G.21 G.35 Mean G.21 G.35 Mean G.21 G.35 Mean G.21 G.35 Mean 60 cm Inter 5.31 5.49 5.40 4.77 5.08 4.92 12.33 14.71 13.52 8.11 9.60 8.85 Solid 9.14 9.31 9.22 8.64 8.91 8.77 16.78 18.22 17.50 15.58 14.97 15.27 Mean 7.22 7.40 7.31 6.70 6.99 6.84 14.55 16.46 15.50 11.84 12.28 12.06 70 cm Inter 6.06 6.21 6.13 5.52 5.78 5.65 13.14 15.44 14.29 9.41 9.46 9.43 Solid 9.91 10.05 9.98 9.33 9.61 9.47 17.20 18.82 18.01 17.72 16.64 17.18 Mean 7.98 8.13 8.05 7.42 7.69 7.56 15.17 17.13 16.15 13.56 13.05 13.30 80 cm Inter 5.62 5.80 5.71 5.15 5.42 5.28 12.81 15.07 13.94 8.79 9.18 8.98 Solid 9.48 9.66 9.57 8.92 9.23 9.07 16.98 18.57 17.77 16.53 15.11 15.82 Mean 7.55 7.73 7.64 7.03 7.32 7.17 14.89 16.82 15.85 12.66 12.14 12.40 Average of cropping systems Inter 5.66 5.83 5.74 5.14 5.42 5.28 12.76 15.07 13.91 8.77 9.41 9.09 Solid 9.51 9.67 9.59 8.96 9.25 9.10 16.98 18.53 17.75 16.61 15.57 16.09 Average of soybean cultivars L.S.D. 0.05 Ridge width (R) L.S.D. 0.05 Cropping systems (C) L.S.D. 0.05 Soybean cultivars (S) L.S.D. 0.05 R x C L.S.D. 0.05 R x S L.S.D. 0.05 C x S L.S.D. 0.05 R x C x S 7.58 7.75 7.66 7.05 7.33 7.19 14.87 16.80 15.83 12.68 12.49 12.58 0.52 0.36 0.25 0.54 0.59 0.44 0.67 0.47 0.35 0.23 0.51 0.57 0.42 0.64 0.52 0.43 0.36 0.55 0.57 0.47 0.62 0.96 0.78 N.S. 1.02 N.S. N.S. N.S. 20
Table 3. Effect of ridge width, cropping systems, soybean cultivars and their interactions on straw and seed yields per ha, harvest index, as well as, corn grain yield/ha at harvest, combined data across 2013 and 2014 seasons Traits Straw yield (ton/ha) Seed yield (ton/ha) Harvest index (%) Corn grain yield (ton/ha) G.21 G.35 Mean G.21 G.35 Mean G.21 G.35 Mean G.21 G.35 Mean 60 cm Inter 6.72 7.73 7.22 1.39 1.87 1.63 17.12 19.47 18.29 6.78 6.81 6.79 Solid 12.71 11.88 12.29 2.87 3.09 2.98 18.41 20.64 19.52 6.99 Mean 9.71 9.80 9.75 2.13 2.48 2.30 17.76 20.05 18.90 6.88 6.90 6.89 70 cm Inter 7.66 7.39 7.52 1.75 2.07 1.91 18.58 21.87 20.22 7.07 7.12 7.09 Solid 14.32 12.92 13.62 3.40 3.72 3.56 19.18 22.35 20.76 7.15 Mean 10.99 10.15 10.57 2.57 2.89 2.73 18.88 22.11 20.49 7.11 7.13 7.12 80 cm Inter 7.18 7.20 7.19 1.61 1.98 1.79 18.31 21.56 19.93 6.84 6.86 6.85 Solid 13.38 11.77 12.57 3.15 3.34 3.24 19.05 22.10 20.57 7.01 Mean 10.28 9.48 9.88 2.38 2.66 2.51 18.68 21.83 20.25 6.92 6.93 6.92 Average of cropping systems Inter 7.18 7.44 7.31 1.58 1.97 1.77 18.00 20.96 19.48 6.89 6.93 6.91 Solid 13.47 12.19 12.83 3.14 3.38 3.26 18.88 21.69 20.28 7.05 Average of soybean cultivars L.S.D. 0.05 Ridge width (R) L.S.D. 0.05 Cropping systems (C) L.S.D. 0.05 Soybean cultivars (S) L.S.D. 0.05 R x C L.S.D. 0.05 R x S L.S.D. 0.05 C x S L.S.D. 0.05 R x C x S 10.32 9.81 10.06 2.36 2.67 2.51 18.44 21.33 19.88 6.97 6.99 6.98 0.66 0.48 0.34 0.73 0.79 0.57 0.85 0.38 0.27 0.19 0.44 0.49 0.32 0.54 1.47 0.73 0.42 1.54 1.61 0.95 1.68 0.12 N.S. N.S. N.S. N.S. N.S. N.S. 21
Page 1 and 2: ISSN 0973-1830 Volume 14, Number 2
Page 3 and 4: SOYBEAN RESEARCH ISSN 0973-1830 Vol
Page 5 and 6: Soybean Research 14(2): 01-13 (2016
Page 7 and 8: Table 1. Nutrient composition (valu
Page 9 and 10: 100-green seed weight (49.9 g) and
Page 11 and 12: Training was provided through NGO p
Page 13 and 14: estimated using combined analysis.
Page 15 and 16: AGS 447 and AGS 457 in a taste surv
Page 17 and 18: Takahashi Y and Ohyama T. 2011. Pro
Page 19 and 20: eached to about 81,4435 ha in 2013
Page 21 and 22: 2. Soybean seeds were sown in both
Page 23: Table 1. Effect of ridge width, cro
Page 27 and 28: and seed yields per ha were affecte
Page 29 and 30: number of branches per plant, pod a
Page 31 and 32: cv. Giza 35 to increase dry matter
Page 33 and 34: increased total and net returns com
Page 35 and 36: Metwally A A. 1999. Intensive coppi
Page 37 and 38: (Salvagiotti et al., 2009). Biologi
Page 39 and 40: Table 1. Effect of land configurati
Page 41 and 42: increasing levels of nitrogen and t
Page 45 and 46: conditions (Ruiz-Lozano et al., 200
Page 47 and 48: of 34 0 C and relative humidity 80
Page 49 and 50: Nodule N (%) Grain yield g/plant) N
Page 51 and 52: 140 120 100 Nodules/plant Nodule dr
Page 53 and 54: of AMF, which necessitates experime
Page 55 and 56: Biermann B and Linderman R G. 1981.
Page 57 and 58: Tabatabai M A and J M Bremner. 1969
Page 59 and 60: N:P 2O 5:K per ha (Patil and Purani
Page 61 and 62: available nitrogen content was reco
Page 63 and 64: lowest value in control (Table 2).
Page 65 and 66: the crop. These results corroborate
Page 69 and 70: the use of a variety by any person
Page 71 and 72: objection is received, the variety
Page 73 and 74: Table 1 contd. S. No. Name of varie
Page 75 and 76:
Table 2. DUS Characteristics of pro
Page 77 and 78:
Table 2. Contd S. No. Varieties DUS
Page 79 and 80:
and are easily available. The varie
Page 81 and 82:
Soybean Research 14(2): 77-83 (2016
Page 83 and 84:
Table 2. Estimates of variability p
Page 85 and 86:
Table 4. Phenotypic path coefficien
Page 87 and 88:
Shivakumar M, Basavaraja G T, Salim
Page 89 and 90:
available phosphorus (24.89 and 23.
Page 91 and 92:
attributes may be the result of red
Page 93 and 94:
Soybean Research 14(2): 89-96 (2016
Page 95 and 96:
productivity. This will help increa
Page 97 and 98:
Growth rate The analysis on growth
Page 99 and 100:
Table 5. Estimates of variability i
Page 101 and 102:
Society for Soybean Research and De
Page 103 and 104:
MS must be original and contribute
Page 105 and 106:
Short research notes They should no
show all

SOYBEAN RESEARCH

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?