12.03.2017 Views

SOYBEAN RESEARCH

Soybean-Research-14(2)-2016

Soybean-Research-14(2)-2016

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

calculated by multiplying grain/straw<br />

yield (kg/ha) with nutrient concentration<br />

for the particular treatment, while, total<br />

N uptake (kg/ha) by the crop was<br />

calculated by sum of nutrient uptake in<br />

grain and straw.<br />

The nitrogen use efficiencies were<br />

calculated in terms of fertilizer N use<br />

efficiency (Yield in treatment – yield in<br />

control/kg N applied), recovery<br />

efficiency (N uptake in treatment - N<br />

uptake in control/kg N applied) and<br />

partial factor productivity (yield/kg N<br />

applied) using standard formulae. The<br />

sustainable yield index was calculated as<br />

mean yield – standard deviation/<br />

maximum yield.<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

Land configuration system<br />

The planting of soybean on BBF<br />

system improved the soybean yield<br />

attributing traits, namely branches per<br />

plant, pods per plant and seed index<br />

significantly over the flat bed planted<br />

soybean (Table 1). Planting of soybean on<br />

BBF enhanced the seed and straw yield<br />

by 5.49 and 7.79 per cent, respectively<br />

and also showed higher value of<br />

sustainable yield index as compared to<br />

flat bed planting. Harvest index remained<br />

unaffected due to land configuration<br />

treatments. The planting of soybean on<br />

BBF showed their superiority with<br />

reference to the total nitrogen uptake,<br />

agronomic efficiency, partial factor<br />

productivity and recovery efficiency over<br />

flat bed planting (Table 2). A similar<br />

trend was also observed in economical<br />

parameters. The higher soybean yield<br />

and nitrogen use efficiencies associated<br />

34<br />

with broad bed planting might be due to<br />

the in-situ moisture conservation, better<br />

acquisition of nutrient including<br />

nitrogen, creation of better soil physicochemical<br />

environment in root zone<br />

(Ramesh et al., 2006) in addition to<br />

drainage of excess water during the crop<br />

life. The furrow helps in conserving the<br />

moisture under scanty rainfall period and<br />

also helps in draining out the excess<br />

water during heavy rainfall period<br />

indicating that under both the conditions<br />

they regulate the hydrological event<br />

properly which provides congenial<br />

environment for soybean growth and<br />

ultimately leading to higher yield. The<br />

BBF and the nitrogen and phosphorus<br />

fertilization package increased grain yield<br />

by 90 per cent, grain nitrogen and<br />

phosphorus uptakes by 183 and 252 per<br />

cent, and stover nitrogen and phosphorus<br />

uptakes by 152 and 121 per cent. Similar<br />

findings were reported by Mandal et al.<br />

(2013) and Fahong et al (2004).<br />

Soybean varieties<br />

Among the two varieties<br />

evaluated, late maturing JS 97-52 showed<br />

its superiority over early maturing JS 95-<br />

60 with respect to almost all the<br />

parameters except for seed index and<br />

harvest index (Table 1). Variety JS 97-52<br />

produced higher seed and straw yield<br />

by27.46 and 55.82 per cent, respectively<br />

over JS 95-60 and also showed higher<br />

values of nitrogen uptake, nitrogen use<br />

efficiencies and economical parameters<br />

(Table 2). The existing differences<br />

between the two varieties in yielding<br />

ability, nitrogen uptake and nitrogen use<br />

efficiencies might be due to differences in<br />

their genetic makeup and maturity

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!