11.12.2012 Views

Chapter 3: Values and Morals:Guidelines for living - Psychological ...

Chapter 3: Values and Morals:Guidelines for living - Psychological ...

Chapter 3: Values and Morals:Guidelines for living - Psychological ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

empathic process is to find a "reversible" solution, one that would be<br />

seen as equally just from each person's perspective <strong>and</strong> considered<br />

fair by a high percentage of rationally thinking people. Example: (1)<br />

Imagine the situation of a poor dying patient, her husb<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> a<br />

druggist who wants $1000.00 profit (10 times its cost) <strong>for</strong> an effective<br />

drug <strong>and</strong> (2) imagine how each would feel in the other's shoes, e.g.<br />

how the patient would feel as the druggist, the druggist as the dying<br />

patient, the patient as the husb<strong>and</strong> thinking about stealing the drug,<br />

etc. A solution that might result from this process would be <strong>for</strong> the<br />

druggist to give the patient the drug, <strong>and</strong> the couple, in turn, would<br />

agree to pay <strong>for</strong> it by working part-time <strong>for</strong> the druggist after the<br />

patient gets well. As we will see later, an 11-year-old girl in Gilligan's<br />

study (1982) arrived at a similar solution.<br />

Current theorists believe it takes time (40-50 years), experience<br />

with different cultures <strong>and</strong> values, emotional maturity, self-control <strong>and</strong><br />

self-esteem, considerable thought about values, <strong>and</strong>/or moral<br />

development training to acquire this kind of moral reasoning. I suspect<br />

stages 5 <strong>and</strong> 6 will be achieved at age 12 or 14, when we know<br />

enough to provide the proper training <strong>and</strong> experience at that age.<br />

Good but extraordinary examples of stage 6 morality are Jesus Christ<br />

(he spoke cogently of universal principles but he died at age 33!), St.<br />

Francis of Assisi, Albert Schweitzer, Abraham Lincoln, Martin Luther<br />

King (he became a civil rights activist at age 26!), <strong>and</strong> Sister Teresa of<br />

Calcutta. Don't let this awesome list of saintly people scare you or<br />

discourage you. Try to become a stage 5 or 6 person by finding some<br />

good causes you are willing to argue <strong>for</strong>, decide what lifestyle you<br />

most value, <strong>and</strong> start doing it.<br />

As you underst<strong>and</strong> these stages better, you may underst<strong>and</strong> more<br />

about why you have made certain moral decisions in the past. Also,<br />

you will realize that you <strong>and</strong> everyone else operate on several levels at<br />

the same time. For example, you may avoid shoplifting <strong>for</strong> the fear of<br />

punishment (stage 1), you may watch your little brother carefully to<br />

be sure he doesn't get more attention than you (stage 2), you may<br />

want to impress your parents or a teacher (stage 3), you may<br />

unthinkingly en<strong>for</strong>ce school rules as a monitor (stage 4), <strong>and</strong> you may<br />

be active in the women's movement or help support a child in India<br />

through CARE (stage 5 or 6). Furthermore, you may find your moral<br />

reasoning on one level <strong>and</strong> your behavior on another: 20% of the<br />

people at stage 6 of moral reasoning still con<strong>for</strong>med (stage 3 or 4)<br />

when asked by an authority to hurt another person (Kohlberg, 1984).<br />

Likewise, my value system says I should share most of my worldly<br />

possessions, but often I don't (partly because most people would think<br />

I was weird <strong>and</strong> stupid).<br />

Are women's values different from men's values?<br />

This section is based in large part on a book by Carol Gilligan<br />

(1982), who as a research assistant with Lawrence Kohlberg became<br />

aware that women responded differently than men to moral dilemmas.<br />

She decided to study these differences more closely rather than<br />

19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!