atw 2017-07
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>atw</strong> Vol. 62 (<strong>2017</strong>) | Issue 7 ı July<br />
484<br />
AMNT <strong>2017</strong> ı COMPETENCE PRIZE<br />
| | Fig. 3.<br />
Thermal non-steady-state operating thermosiphon.<br />
and transports the heat by sensitive<br />
instead of latent heat transfer. Superheated<br />
vapor bubbles grow to the<br />
dimension of the pipe diameter and<br />
suddenly push the liquid above in the<br />
condenser section (geyser boiling).<br />
At this moment the evaporator<br />
temperature drops to its initial value<br />
and the temperature in the adiabatic<br />
section and condenser rises abruptly.<br />
Similar fluctuations depending on<br />
the overheated pool can also be<br />
observed in the pressure measurements.<br />
Besides these periodical<br />
temperature and pressure fluctuations<br />
of geyser boiling, this boiling regime<br />
is also recognizable by an audible<br />
cracking sound within the pipe.<br />
The cooling circuit expeditiously<br />
removes the heat from the condenser<br />
and the initial temperatures are<br />
reached again. The procedure of overheating<br />
and flashing starts all over<br />
again. This pulsating operation of the<br />
thermosiphon could be the result of<br />
multiple parameters and influences,<br />
which limit the performance and<br />
prevent the pipe from stable operation.<br />
For instance, the surface of the<br />
inner pipe wall of the thermosiphon is<br />
possibly not rough enough and the<br />
resulting lack of evaporation nuclei<br />
effects the overheating of the liquid<br />
pool. Furthermore, the high driving<br />
temperature difference seems to<br />
demand high heat transfer rates for a<br />
steady-state operation. Each driving<br />
temperature difference is related to a<br />
certain heat transport performance.<br />
This oscillating geyser operation<br />
mode is known to occur especially<br />
for high filling ratios and high density<br />
differences [7, 10].<br />
difference between the heat source<br />
i.e. an average evaporator wall<br />
temperature and the heat sink by<br />
means of the inlet temperature of<br />
the double-pipe chiller is shown.<br />
A vertical pipe with 32 mm inner<br />
diameter and a filling ratio of 100 %<br />
is investigated for varying heating<br />
power from 1.3 kW to 2 kW and<br />
different coolant inlet temperatures<br />
from 10 °C to 30 °C. For each coolant<br />
temperature, a linear trend between<br />
the transferred heat and the driving<br />
temperature is observed. An increased<br />
heat transfer rate leads to an increase<br />
in the overall temperature difference.<br />
By comparing the overheated evaporator<br />
wall, the temperature difference<br />
between evaporator and condenser in<br />
the pipe and the temperature difference<br />
in the chiller it becomes apparent<br />
that the increase of the driving<br />
temperature difference is mainly due<br />
to an increase in the wall overheating<br />
of the evaporator. The temperatures<br />
in evaporator and condenser section<br />
in the pipe even converge with<br />
increasing heat transfer rate.<br />
Another apparent trend shown in<br />
Figure 4, is that an increase in the<br />
coolant inlet temperature in connected<br />
to a decrease in the overall<br />
temperature difference at same heat<br />
transfer rate. At a constant driving<br />
temperature difference, the measurements<br />
at higher coolant temperatures<br />
and therefore higher heat transfer<br />
rates showed an increase in the<br />
stability of temperatures and pressures.<br />
It is assumed, that low operation<br />
temperature in combination with<br />
low heat transfer rates promote<br />
fluctuations in the temperatures and<br />
geyser boiling.<br />
The spreading of measurements<br />
shown in Figure 4 is presumably<br />
provoked by variations in the volume<br />
flow of the coolant. The volume flow<br />
rate in the secondary cooling circuit is<br />
manually adjusted and for all shown<br />
results approximately 4.8 l/min.<br />
Conclusion and future work<br />
The thermal operating characteristic<br />
of long thermosiphons (10 m) were<br />
investigated varying their filling ratio<br />
(100 %, 70 %) and their thermal<br />
boundary conditions considering the<br />
operating conditions for passive heat<br />
removal in spent fuel pools.<br />
So far the experimental results<br />
imply a tendency that the filling ratio<br />
of 70 % operates at higher performances<br />
than the 100 % FR for same<br />
diameters. With larger pipe diameter,<br />
the transferred heat increases by<br />
trend, according to the increase of the<br />
transfer area. Overall, the heat<br />
transfer performance increases with<br />
higher driving temperatures.<br />
Especially at low operating temperatures,<br />
the thermosiphon operates<br />
in a periodic geyser boiling. In this<br />
context, the minimum driving temperature<br />
difference has to be<br />
Influence of the heat sink<br />
In Figure 4 the influence of the heat<br />
sink on the heat transfer rate and the<br />
corresponding driving temperature<br />
| | Fig. 4.<br />
Transferred heat vs. temperature difference between heat source and heat sink for varying inlet<br />
temperatures in the double-pipe cooler.<br />
AMNT <strong>2017</strong><br />
Experimental Investigation on Passive Heat Transfer by Long Closed Two-Phase Thermosiphons ı Claudia Graß, Rudi Kulenovic and Jörg Starflinger