07.07.2017 Views

atw 2017-07

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>atw</strong> Vol. 62 (<strong>2017</strong>) | Issue 7 ı July<br />

484<br />

AMNT <strong>2017</strong> ı COMPETENCE PRIZE<br />

| | Fig. 3.<br />

Thermal non-steady-state operating thermosiphon.<br />

and transports the heat by sensitive<br />

instead of latent heat transfer. Superheated<br />

vapor bubbles grow to the<br />

dimension of the pipe diameter and<br />

suddenly push the liquid above in the<br />

condenser section (geyser boiling).<br />

At this moment the evaporator<br />

temperature drops to its initial value<br />

and the temperature in the adiabatic<br />

section and condenser rises abruptly.<br />

Similar fluctuations depending on<br />

the overheated pool can also be<br />

observed in the pressure measurements.<br />

Besides these periodical<br />

temperature and pressure fluctuations<br />

of geyser boiling, this boiling regime<br />

is also recognizable by an audible<br />

cracking sound within the pipe.<br />

The cooling circuit expeditiously<br />

removes the heat from the condenser<br />

and the initial temperatures are<br />

reached again. The procedure of overheating<br />

and flashing starts all over<br />

again. This pulsating operation of the<br />

thermosiphon could be the result of<br />

multiple parameters and influences,<br />

which limit the performance and<br />

prevent the pipe from stable operation.<br />

For instance, the surface of the<br />

inner pipe wall of the thermosiphon is<br />

possibly not rough enough and the<br />

resulting lack of evaporation nuclei<br />

effects the overheating of the liquid<br />

pool. Furthermore, the high driving<br />

temperature difference seems to<br />

demand high heat transfer rates for a<br />

steady-state operation. Each driving<br />

temperature difference is related to a<br />

certain heat transport performance.<br />

This oscillating geyser operation<br />

mode is known to occur especially<br />

for high filling ratios and high density<br />

differences [7, 10].<br />

difference between the heat source<br />

i.e. an average evaporator wall<br />

temperature and the heat sink by<br />

means of the inlet temperature of<br />

the double-pipe chiller is shown.<br />

A vertical pipe with 32 mm inner<br />

diameter and a filling ratio of 100 %<br />

is investigated for varying heating<br />

power from 1.3 kW to 2 kW and<br />

different coolant inlet temperatures<br />

from 10 °C to 30 °C. For each coolant<br />

temperature, a linear trend between<br />

the transferred heat and the driving<br />

temperature is observed. An increased<br />

heat transfer rate leads to an increase<br />

in the overall temperature difference.<br />

By comparing the overheated evaporator<br />

wall, the temperature difference<br />

between evaporator and condenser in<br />

the pipe and the temperature difference<br />

in the chiller it becomes apparent<br />

that the increase of the driving<br />

temperature difference is mainly due<br />

to an increase in the wall overheating<br />

of the evaporator. The temperatures<br />

in evaporator and condenser section<br />

in the pipe even converge with<br />

increasing heat transfer rate.<br />

Another apparent trend shown in<br />

Figure 4, is that an increase in the<br />

coolant inlet temperature in connected<br />

to a decrease in the overall<br />

temperature difference at same heat<br />

transfer rate. At a constant driving<br />

temperature difference, the measurements<br />

at higher coolant temperatures<br />

and therefore higher heat transfer<br />

rates showed an increase in the<br />

stability of temperatures and pressures.<br />

It is assumed, that low operation<br />

temperature in combination with<br />

low heat transfer rates promote<br />

fluctuations in the temperatures and<br />

geyser boiling.<br />

The spreading of measurements<br />

shown in Figure 4 is presumably<br />

provoked by variations in the volume<br />

flow of the coolant. The volume flow<br />

rate in the secondary cooling circuit is<br />

manually adjusted and for all shown<br />

results approximately 4.8 l/min.<br />

Conclusion and future work<br />

The thermal operating characteristic<br />

of long thermosiphons (10 m) were<br />

investigated varying their filling ratio<br />

(100 %, 70 %) and their thermal<br />

boundary conditions considering the<br />

operating conditions for passive heat<br />

removal in spent fuel pools.<br />

So far the experimental results<br />

imply a tendency that the filling ratio<br />

of 70 % operates at higher performances<br />

than the 100 % FR for same<br />

diameters. With larger pipe diameter,<br />

the transferred heat increases by<br />

trend, according to the increase of the<br />

transfer area. Overall, the heat<br />

transfer performance increases with<br />

higher driving temperatures.<br />

Especially at low operating temperatures,<br />

the thermosiphon operates<br />

in a periodic geyser boiling. In this<br />

context, the minimum driving temperature<br />

difference has to be<br />

Influence of the heat sink<br />

In Figure 4 the influence of the heat<br />

sink on the heat transfer rate and the<br />

corresponding driving temperature<br />

| | Fig. 4.<br />

Transferred heat vs. temperature difference between heat source and heat sink for varying inlet<br />

temperatures in the double-pipe cooler.<br />

AMNT <strong>2017</strong><br />

Experimental Investigation on Passive Heat Transfer by Long Closed Two-Phase Thermosiphons ı Claudia Graß, Rudi Kulenovic and Jörg Starflinger

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!