13.12.2012 Views

Japan Real Estate Third Quarter 2012 - RREEF Real Estate

Japan Real Estate Third Quarter 2012 - RREEF Real Estate

Japan Real Estate Third Quarter 2012 - RREEF Real Estate

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

RESEARCH REPORT<br />

<strong>Japan</strong> <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Estate</strong><br />

<strong>Third</strong> <strong>Quarter</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />

July <strong>2012</strong><br />

<strong>RREEF</strong> <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Estate</strong><br />

www.rreef.com


Prepared By:<br />

Koichiro (Ko) Obu<br />

Director<br />

Head of Research, <strong>Japan</strong> & Korea<br />

+81 (0) 3 5156 6522<br />

koichiro.obu@rreef.com<br />

Mark Roberts<br />

Global Head of Research<br />

+1(212) 454-0974<br />

mark-g.roberts@rreef.com<br />

Table of Contents<br />

<strong>RREEF</strong> REAL ESTATE <strong>Japan</strong> <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Estate</strong> <strong>Third</strong> <strong>Quarter</strong> <strong>2012</strong> | July <strong>2012</strong><br />

Executive Summary ............................................................................ 1<br />

Macro Economy .................................................................................. 2<br />

Capital Market & Pricing ...................................................................... 4<br />

J-REITs ............................................................................................... 8<br />

Market Fundamentals ........................................................................ 10<br />

Office ............................................................................ 10<br />

Retail ............................................................................ 12<br />

Residential .................................................................... 13<br />

Industrial ....................................................................... 15<br />

Past Issues ........................................................................................ 16<br />

Important Notes ................................................................................ 17<br />

Global Research Team ..................................................................... 18


Executive Summary<br />

The outlook for <strong>Japan</strong>’s economic growth in <strong>2012</strong> has improved. Deutsche Bank<br />

economists now expect GDP growth of 3.1 percent this year instead of the 2.8 percent<br />

forecast from just three months ago. With consumer confidence recovering, private<br />

consumption has surprised on the upside. Although most near-term leading indicators<br />

appear encouraging, economic growth is expected to peak in mid <strong>2012</strong>. Waning external<br />

demand from Europe, the United States, and China is likely to contribute to a slowdown in<br />

2013. A planned consumption tax could also hold back growth to some extent in 2014.<br />

<strong>Japan</strong>’s property markets provided mixed signals in the first half of <strong>2012</strong>. On the upside,<br />

J-REITs enjoyed buoyant performance earlier in the year, paving the way for two new<br />

IPOs in the second quarter with more planned for later this year. The volume of asset<br />

purchases by J-REITs reached JPY462.9 billion in the first half of <strong>2012</strong>, an increase of<br />

49.5 percent from the same period in 2011. Limited construction of new logistics space<br />

helped pull the industrial vacancy rate below 2.0 percent in Tokyo and close to full<br />

occupancy in Osaka. Both domestic and foreign buyers have responded to <strong>Japan</strong>’s<br />

industrial market fundamentals, sending transaction volumes up in this sector. Asking<br />

rents in the residential sector held stable across Tokyo’s 23 wards in the second quarter,<br />

with positive upward movement in the five centrally located wards. In the retail sector,<br />

improving consumer sentiment helped pull sales up for shopping centres.<br />

The downside of the property market centres heavily on the office sector. New supply in<br />

Tokyo drove the vacancy rate to an all-time high of 9.4 percent in June, and transaction<br />

volumes in the sector have been limited. Osaka may face a similar disruption to office<br />

fundamentals over the coming year as a wave of new supply is expected to complete in<br />

that market as well. The high-end segment of the residential rental market in Tokyo<br />

softened between the first and second quarters, a general reflection of the outlook for<br />

financial services, a key driver of luxury residential rents.<br />

<strong>RREEF</strong> REAL ESTATE <strong>Japan</strong> <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Estate</strong> <strong>Third</strong> <strong>Quarter</strong> <strong>2012</strong> | July <strong>2012</strong><br />

1


Macro Economy<br />

<strong>Japan</strong>’s GDP growth forecast in <strong>2012</strong> was revised upward to 3.1 percent; an increase<br />

from the 2.8 percent forecast by Deutsche Bank economists in the previous quarter. This<br />

improvement reflects healthier than expected private consumption as well as the<br />

contribution of the latest supplementary budget for reconstruction initiatives by the<br />

government. Economic growth is expected to peak in mid <strong>2012</strong>, however, due to waning<br />

external demand from Europe, the United States, and China. Reconstruction-related<br />

demand is likely to taper gradually in 2013, and the government is planning to increase<br />

the consumption tax rate to 8 percent in April 2014 from the current 5 percent, which is<br />

expected to drag down the growth rate.<br />

<strong>RREEF</strong> REAL ESTATE <strong>Japan</strong> <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Estate</strong> <strong>Third</strong> <strong>Quarter</strong> <strong>2012</strong> | July <strong>2012</strong><br />

4%<br />

2%<br />

0%<br />

-2%<br />

-4%<br />

-6%<br />

-8%<br />

-10%<br />

-12%<br />

Note: F = forecast. Please refer to Important Notes (page 17)<br />

Sources: Deutsche Bank, “<strong>Japan</strong> Economics Weekly”<br />

As of July <strong>2012</strong><br />

Exhibit 1 — GDP Growth Outlook for <strong>Japan</strong><br />

The diffusion index (DI) of the Tankan Survey conducted by the Bank of <strong>Japan</strong> increased<br />

by three points in the second quarter of <strong>2012</strong> from the previous quarter, with stable<br />

momentum expected for the third quarter. The Business Condition Leading Index<br />

calculated by <strong>Japan</strong>’s Cabinet Office also showed positive signals. This reflects firm<br />

private consumption, bolstered by a receding post-quake mood of self-restraint, as well as<br />

the revival of subsidies for eco-friendly cars.<br />

Exhibit 2 — Diffusion Index of Business Conditions<br />

Sources: The Bank of <strong>Japan</strong>, <strong>Japan</strong>’s Cabinet Office, <strong>RREEF</strong> <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Estate</strong><br />

As of July <strong>2012</strong><br />

1995<br />

1996<br />

(2005=100) 119<br />

106<br />

93<br />

80<br />

67<br />

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 annual growth<br />

previous financial<br />

crisis in <strong>Japan</strong> (1998)<br />

1991<br />

1997<br />

1998<br />

1999<br />

2000<br />

dot.com bubble burst<br />

2001<br />

2002<br />

2003<br />

2004<br />

global financial<br />

crisis<br />

2005<br />

2006<br />

2007<br />

2008<br />

2009<br />

2010<br />

2011<br />

DB Forecast<br />

Great Tohoku<br />

Earthquake aftermoth<br />

Business Condition Leading Index (LHS) Diffusion Index of Tankan Survey (RHS)<br />

1992<br />

1993<br />

previous financial crisis<br />

in <strong>Japan</strong> (1998)<br />

1994<br />

1995<br />

1996<br />

1997<br />

1998<br />

1999<br />

2000<br />

<strong>2012</strong>F<br />

Diffusion Index of Business Conditions:<br />

('favourable' minus 'unfavourable', % points)<br />

dot.com bubble<br />

burst<br />

2001<br />

2002<br />

2003<br />

2004<br />

2005<br />

global financial<br />

crisis<br />

2006<br />

2007<br />

2008<br />

2009<br />

2010<br />

2011<br />

<strong>2012</strong><br />

2013F<br />

0<br />

2014F<br />

50<br />

25<br />

-25<br />

-50<br />

2015F<br />

2


<strong>Japan</strong>’s consumer price index (CPI) increased to 0.4 percent in the first quarter of <strong>2012</strong>,<br />

the highest figure since 2008. A correction in oil and other commodity prices could lead<br />

<strong>Japan</strong>’s CPI back into negative territory in 2013, but prices are set to rise sharply to 2.4<br />

percent in April 2014 due to a planned consumption tax increase. The Bank of <strong>Japan</strong> is<br />

expected to maintain a passive monetary policy stance as political pressure wanes for<br />

further easing.<br />

(%)<br />

<strong>RREEF</strong> REAL ESTATE <strong>Japan</strong> <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Estate</strong> <strong>Third</strong> <strong>Quarter</strong> <strong>2012</strong> | July <strong>2012</strong><br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

-1<br />

-2<br />

-3<br />

2000<br />

Note: F = forecast<br />

Exhibit 3 — Forecast of Short-Term Interest Rate and CPI<br />

Sources: The Bank of <strong>Japan</strong>, <strong>Japan</strong>’s Cabinet Office, <strong>RREEF</strong> <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Estate</strong><br />

As of July <strong>2012</strong><br />

2001<br />

2002<br />

2003<br />

Call Rate (overnight) CPI<br />

2004<br />

2005<br />

2006<br />

2007<br />

2008<br />

2009<br />

2010<br />

2011<br />

<strong>2012</strong>F<br />

Consumption Tax<br />

hike in April 2014<br />

DB Forecast<br />

2013F<br />

2014F<br />

2015F<br />

3


Capital Market & Pricing<br />

Interest rates remain low, with favourable credit conditions for borrowers expected to<br />

persist. The Bank of <strong>Japan</strong>’s DI for the lending attitudes of banks to the real estate<br />

industry (red line in Exhibit 4) has been positive for five consecutive quarters, and<br />

accordingly, lending to new real estate projects posted positive growth for the past two<br />

consecutive quarters. Concerns are growing, however, in the real estate leasing market<br />

since the office vacancy rate hit an all-time high in June <strong>2012</strong> due to a supply increase<br />

(see page 10).<br />

20%<br />

-20%<br />

-40%<br />

Sources: Bank of <strong>Japan</strong>, <strong>RREEF</strong> <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Estate</strong><br />

As of July <strong>2012</strong><br />

<strong>RREEF</strong> REAL ESTATE <strong>Japan</strong> <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Estate</strong> <strong>Third</strong> <strong>Quarter</strong> <strong>2012</strong> | July <strong>2012</strong><br />

0%<br />

Exhibit 4 — <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Estate</strong> Lending by <strong>Japan</strong>ese Banks<br />

Despite favourable refinancing terms offered by lenders, transaction volume has been in<br />

the doldrums and has fallen below the JPY 2 trillion per year level in recent quarters. The<br />

deal flow is limited especially in the office sector, while domestic and foreign investors<br />

remained active in other sectors.<br />

(JPY tn)<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

Exhibit 5 — <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Estate</strong> Transaction Volume and Lending Attitude DI<br />

Sources: Urban Research Institute, Bank of <strong>Japan</strong>, <strong>Real</strong> Capital Analytics, <strong>RREEF</strong> <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Estate</strong><br />

As of July <strong>2012</strong><br />

2008.03<br />

2008.06<br />

2008.09<br />

2008.12<br />

growth of lending to new projects (yoy, LHS)<br />

lending attitude DI to all industries (RHS)<br />

lending attitude DI to real estate industries (RHS)<br />

2009.03<br />

2009.06<br />

2009.09<br />

2009.12<br />

2010.03<br />

2010.06<br />

transaction volume (12 months, LHS) lending attitude DI (6 months prior, RHS)<br />

2000.09<br />

2001.03<br />

2001.09<br />

2002.03<br />

2002.09<br />

2003.03<br />

2003.09<br />

2004.03<br />

2004.09<br />

2005.03<br />

2005.09<br />

2006.03<br />

2006.09<br />

2007.03<br />

2007.09<br />

2008.03<br />

2008.09<br />

2009.03<br />

2009.09<br />

2010.03<br />

2010.09<br />

2011.03<br />

2011.09<br />

<strong>2012</strong>.03<br />

<strong>2012</strong>.09<br />

2010.09<br />

2010.12<br />

2011.03<br />

2011.06<br />

2011.09<br />

2011.12<br />

<strong>2012</strong>.03<br />

0<br />

20<br />

0<br />

-20<br />

-40<br />

36<br />

24<br />

12<br />

-12<br />

-24<br />

-36<br />

Diffusion Index (DI)<br />

Diffusion Index (DI)<br />

4


Cap rates for assets in Tokyo and Osaka held by J-REITs started to recover in the second<br />

half of 2011 and preliminary numbers point towards continued improvement. The average<br />

cap rate on completed transactions is around 6 percent, the highest level in five years.<br />

This reflects increased activity in high-yielding sectors such as industrial and the decline in<br />

office transactions in Tokyo.<br />

The average yield spread — the difference between the average cap rate of all reported<br />

commercial real estate transactions and government bond yields — held above 500 basis<br />

points in the first quarter of <strong>2012</strong>. <strong>Japan</strong> continues to provide one of the most attractive<br />

spreads among major real estate markets.<br />

7.0%<br />

6.0%<br />

5.0%<br />

4.0%<br />

3.0%<br />

2.0%<br />

<strong>RREEF</strong> REAL ESTATE <strong>Japan</strong> <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Estate</strong> <strong>Third</strong> <strong>Quarter</strong> <strong>2012</strong> | July <strong>2012</strong><br />

Exhibit 6 — Cap Rate (appraisal) and Yield Spread (transacted)<br />

Sources: <strong>Real</strong> Capital Analytics, Bloomberg, <strong>RREEF</strong> <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Estate</strong><br />

As of July <strong>2012</strong><br />

Average Appraisal Cap Rate<br />

for Assets held by J-REITs<br />

Tokyo Office Osaka Office<br />

Tokyo Residential Osaka Residential<br />

<strong>Japan</strong> (transacted)<br />

preliminary<br />

Q1<br />

Q2<br />

Q3<br />

Q4<br />

Q1<br />

Q2<br />

Q3<br />

Q4<br />

Q1<br />

Q2<br />

Q3<br />

Q4<br />

Q1<br />

Q2<br />

Q3<br />

Q4<br />

Q1<br />

Q2<br />

Q3<br />

Q4<br />

Q1<br />

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 <strong>2012</strong><br />

(bps)<br />

600<br />

500<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

100<br />

Exhibit 7 shows major real estate transactions either completed or announced since the<br />

beginning of the second quarter of <strong>2012</strong>. Foreign investors and J-REITs remained active.<br />

At least two office deals arose from CMBS defaults during the period, including a sale of<br />

the former headquarter building of Shinsei Bank. While the cumulative amount of<br />

technically defaulted CMBS is estimated to be about JPY1 trillion (US$12 billion) as of the<br />

end of 2011 in <strong>Japan</strong>, most has been retained by debt investors, so distressed sales have<br />

been limited to date.<br />

0<br />

Average Yield Spread for Transactions in<br />

Selected Markets<br />

<strong>Japan</strong> United States<br />

United Kingdom Australia<br />

Singapore Hong Kong<br />

Q1<br />

Q2<br />

Q3<br />

Q4<br />

Q1<br />

Q2<br />

Q3<br />

Q4<br />

Q1<br />

Q2<br />

Q3<br />

Q4<br />

Q1<br />

Q2<br />

Q3<br />

Q4<br />

Q1<br />

Q2<br />

Q3<br />

Q4<br />

Q1<br />

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 <strong>2012</strong><br />

5


Exhibit 7 — Major Transactions in the First <strong>Quarter</strong> <strong>2012</strong> and Potential Deals<br />

Month Type Asset<br />

Jan-12 retail Zara Fukuoka Tenjin<br />

Notes: est.: estimated, bk: book value, coll: collateral value. Non-office deals, assets outside Tokyo, and acquisitions by foreign managers are highlighted in<br />

yellow. This table is prepared solely for information purposes and not intended to recommend or endorse any specific company's shares or other products.<br />

Sources: <strong>Real</strong> Capital Analytics, Nikkei <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Estate</strong> Market Report, <strong>RREEF</strong> <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Estate</strong><br />

As of July <strong>2012</strong><br />

Tokyo’s volume of commercial real estate transactions in the last 12 months was US$22.6<br />

billion. Tokyo maintained the third position in the global market and the first position in the<br />

Asia Pacific region although the volume of office transactions slipped to fourth place from<br />

the second place in the same period last year.<br />

Exhibit 8.1 — <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Estate</strong> Transaction Volume by City (12 months to June <strong>2012</strong>)<br />

Notes: Commercial real estate transactions exclude non-income producing assets, such as development site transactions<br />

Sources: <strong>Real</strong> Capital Analytics, <strong>RREEF</strong> <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Estate</strong><br />

As of July <strong>2012</strong><br />

<strong>RREEF</strong> REAL ESTATE <strong>Japan</strong> <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Estate</strong> <strong>Third</strong> <strong>Quarter</strong> <strong>2012</strong> | July <strong>2012</strong><br />

Price<br />

(JPY<br />

billio n)<br />

1.5<br />

(mortgage)<br />

Unit<br />

price<br />

(JP Y m<br />

/sum)<br />

Cap<br />

rates<br />

Prefecture<br />

Acquired by<br />

- - Fukuoka Credit Suisse's fund<br />

Investor<br />

origin<br />

Switzerland<br />

Feb-12 retail 3 shopping malls 13.2 - - Tokyo, Osaka CapitaMalls Asia Singapore<br />

Mar-12 hotel Niseko Kogen Hotel - - - Hokkaido Symphony International Hlds UK<br />

Mar-12 office Ginza 4-chome Tower - - - Tokyo MGPA Hong Kong<br />

Apr-12 residential<br />

KDX Daikanyama and Sakaisuji<br />

Honmachi etc. (20 properties)<br />

30 - - diversified<br />

Kenedix Residential REIT (REIT<br />

IPO)<br />

Apr-12 office Meguro Place Tower 3.7 0.8 - Tokyo JV of Aviva and Secured UK/<strong>Japan</strong><br />

Apr-12 office Senri Life Science Center Bldg. 8.1 0.2 8.9% Osaka<br />

Lasalle Investment and Kenedix<br />

<strong>Real</strong>ty (REIT)<br />

US/<strong>Japan</strong><br />

Apr-12 industrial GREEN CUBE est.5.1 - - Osaka Blackstone US<br />

Apr-12 residential Takanawa MOF Lodging 10.0 0.5 Tokyo<br />

Metropolitan Government of<br />

Tokyo<br />

May-12 office Atago Green Hills (20%) 25.6 1.2 4.7% Tokyo Mori Hills REIT <strong>Japan</strong><br />

May-12 office<br />

Roppongi First Bldg (46%) and one<br />

other office bldg.<br />

25.6 1 3.0% Tokyo Mori Building <strong>Japan</strong><br />

May-12 retail Ginza Theatre Bldg 17.9 0.9 - Tokyo a <strong>Japan</strong>ese company <strong>Japan</strong><br />

Jun-12 office/retail<br />

Tokyu Plaza Omotesando, Tokyu<br />

Plaza Akasaka etc. (18 properties)<br />

170 - - diversified<br />

Activia Property REIT sponsored<br />

by Tokyu Land (REIT IPO)<br />

Jun-12 office TIXTOWER UENO 22 0.9 4.8% Tokyo <strong>Japan</strong> <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Estate</strong> (REIT) <strong>Japan</strong><br />

Jun-12 dev. site Chiba retail site (56,208�) 32 - - Chiba Costco group US<br />

Jun-12 dev. site Oiso residential site (9,000�) - - - Kanagawa IPC Corporation Singapore<br />

Jun-12 office etc. 8 properties (CMBS default) est.12 - - Tokyo MGPA's fund Hong Kong<br />

Jun-12 office<br />

Former Shinsei Bank HQ Office<br />

(CMBS default)<br />

est.51 - - Tokyo Kenedix <strong>Japan</strong><br />

Jun-12 retail Aoyama Bell Commons est.10> - - Tokyo Angelo Gordon, Simplex US/<strong>Japan</strong><br />

Jul-12 office NBF Commodio Shiodome 29 1.4 4.8% Tokyo Nippon Building Fund (REIT) <strong>Japan</strong><br />

Jul-12 office Yakuin Business Garden 11.0 0.5 5.6% Fukuoka <strong>Japan</strong> Prime <strong>Real</strong>ty (REIT) <strong>Japan</strong><br />

NYC Metro<br />

London Metro<br />

Tokyo<br />

Paris<br />

DC Metro<br />

LA Metro<br />

SF Metro<br />

Hong Kong<br />

Seoul<br />

Chicago<br />

Singapore<br />

Moscow<br />

Toronto<br />

Houston<br />

Dallas<br />

Sydney<br />

Shanghai<br />

Beijing<br />

Guangzhou<br />

Osaka<br />

Office Retail Apartment Industrial Hotel<br />

($bn)<br />

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35<br />

<strong>Japan</strong><br />

<strong>Japan</strong><br />

<strong>Japan</strong><br />

6


Below is the commercial real estate transaction volume by sector in <strong>Japan</strong>. The volume of<br />

transactions declined about 26 percent in the first quarter of <strong>2012</strong> from the same period in<br />

the previous year. Limited deal flow in the office sector resulted in three consecutive<br />

quarters of overall decline. Meanwhile, volume increased in the industrial sector during the<br />

period.<br />

Exhibit 8.2 — <strong>Quarter</strong>ly <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Estate</strong> Transaction Volumes by Sector in <strong>Japan</strong><br />

Notes: Commercial real estate transactions exclude non-income producing assets, such as development site transactions<br />

Sources: <strong>Real</strong> Capital Analytics, <strong>RREEF</strong> <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Estate</strong><br />

As of July <strong>2012</strong><br />

Based on the monthly indicator tracked by Investment Property Databank (IPD), the<br />

average annual total return for direct real estate investment on an unlevered basis in<br />

<strong>Japan</strong> improved marginally to 3.7 percent per annum as of February <strong>2012</strong> (the latest<br />

preliminary number available), compared to 3.5 percent in the previous quarter. The<br />

residential sector produced the highest total returns due to the recent cap rate<br />

compression in the sector (see Exhibit 6) as well as the generally stable nature of the<br />

residential rental market (relative to the office sector).<br />

<strong>RREEF</strong> REAL ESTATE <strong>Japan</strong> <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Estate</strong> <strong>Third</strong> <strong>Quarter</strong> <strong>2012</strong> | July <strong>2012</strong><br />

(bn)<br />

20<br />

16<br />

12<br />

8<br />

4<br />

-<br />

-4<br />

-8<br />

15%<br />

10%<br />

5%<br />

0%<br />

-5%<br />

-10%<br />

-15%<br />

Exhibit 9 — <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Estate</strong> Total Returns in <strong>Japan</strong> (unlevered)<br />

Notes: There is a time lag because of raw data being collected through semi-annual reports. Past performance is not indicative of future results<br />

Sources: IPD <strong>Japan</strong> Monthly Indicator, <strong>RREEF</strong> <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Estate</strong><br />

As of July <strong>2012</strong><br />

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1<br />

'07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12<br />

Total Return Income Return<br />

Capital Growth<br />

(annual total return, all asset classes)<br />

2003<br />

2005<br />

2007<br />

preliminary<br />

2008.06<br />

2008.12<br />

2009.06<br />

2009.12<br />

2010.06<br />

2010.12<br />

2011.06<br />

2011.12<br />

<strong>2012</strong>.02<br />

15%<br />

10%<br />

5%<br />

0%<br />

-5%<br />

-10%<br />

-15%<br />

300%<br />

240%<br />

180%<br />

120%<br />

60%<br />

0%<br />

-60%<br />

-120%<br />

office<br />

retail<br />

residential<br />

industrial<br />

hotel<br />

land/other<br />

growth % (yoy)<br />

Office Retail Residential<br />

2003<br />

2005<br />

2007<br />

(annual total return)<br />

2008.06<br />

2008.12<br />

2009.06<br />

2009.12<br />

2010.06<br />

2010.12<br />

preliminary<br />

2011.06<br />

2011.12<br />

<strong>2012</strong>.02<br />

7


J-REITs<br />

Backed by the Bank of <strong>Japan</strong>’s additional monetary easing in February, the J-REIT index<br />

was buoyant in early <strong>2012</strong>. The index is still exposed to capital market volatility, however,<br />

so it declined along with other equities as the euro crisis deepened in May. Over the<br />

longer time horizon, the recovery of the J-REIT index is substantially lagging compared to<br />

the U.S. and Singaporean REIT markets.<br />

<strong>RREEF</strong> REAL ESTATE <strong>Japan</strong> <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Estate</strong> <strong>Third</strong> <strong>Quarter</strong> <strong>2012</strong> | July <strong>2012</strong><br />

Exhibit 10 — Short Term J-REIT Index and Long Term Global Comparison<br />

J-REIT<br />

Index<br />

1,100 (LHS)<br />

1,000<br />

900<br />

800<br />

2010.09<br />

2010.11<br />

Notes: Past performance is not indicative of future results. Tokyo Stock Exchange REIT Index (J-REIT), FTSE NAREIT All Equity REITS Index (US-REIT),<br />

S&P/ASX 200 A-REIT Index (A-REIT), FTSE ST REIT Index (S-REIT)<br />

Sources: Bloomberg, <strong>RREEF</strong> <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Estate</strong><br />

As of July <strong>2012</strong><br />

On average, the expected J-REIT dividend yield is 5.6 percent overall (and 4.7 percent for<br />

office REITs), providing 460 basis point spreads over the government bond yield. This is<br />

compared with about 200 basis point spreads for U.S.-REITs and UK-REITs.<br />

8%<br />

6%<br />

4%<br />

2%<br />

0%<br />

Exhibit 11 — J-REIT Expected Dividend Yield<br />

Sources: Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Research Institute, Bloomberg, <strong>RREEF</strong> <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Estate</strong><br />

As of July <strong>2012</strong><br />

Great Tohoku<br />

Earthquake<br />

2011.01<br />

2011.03<br />

2011.05<br />

2011.07<br />

2011.09<br />

2011.11<br />

Nikkei 225<br />

(RHS)<br />

<strong>2012</strong>.01<br />

<strong>2012</strong>.03<br />

<strong>2012</strong>.05<br />

<strong>2012</strong>.07<br />

(JPY)<br />

11,000<br />

10,000<br />

9,000<br />

8,000<br />

Following the J-REIT index’s buoyant performance in early <strong>2012</strong>, two new IPOs moved<br />

forward during the second quarter of this year: Kenedix Residential REIT in April and<br />

Activia Properties in June. These were the first J-REIT IPOs in four and half years in<br />

400<br />

350<br />

300<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

2003.03<br />

J-REIT US-REIT<br />

A-REIT (Australia) S-REIT (Singapore)<br />

2003.12<br />

2004.09<br />

2005.06<br />

2006.03<br />

(Mar-09 = 100)<br />

J-REIT Office REIT 10Y JGB<br />

2001.09<br />

2001.12<br />

2002.03<br />

2002.06<br />

2002.09<br />

2002.12<br />

2003.03<br />

2003.06<br />

2003.09<br />

2003.12<br />

2004.03<br />

2004.06<br />

2004.09<br />

2004.12<br />

2005.03<br />

2005.06<br />

2005.09<br />

2005.12<br />

2006.03<br />

2006.06<br />

2006.09<br />

2006.12<br />

2007.03<br />

2007.06<br />

2007.09<br />

2007.12<br />

2008.03<br />

2008.06<br />

2008.09<br />

2008.12<br />

2009.03<br />

2009.06<br />

2009.09<br />

2009.12<br />

2010.03<br />

2010.06<br />

2010.09<br />

2010.12<br />

2011.03<br />

2011.06<br />

2011.09<br />

2011.12<br />

<strong>2012</strong>.03<br />

<strong>2012</strong>.06<br />

2006.12<br />

2007.09<br />

2008.06<br />

2009.03<br />

2009.12<br />

2010.09<br />

2011.06<br />

<strong>2012</strong>.03<br />

8


<strong>Japan</strong>, and Activia was the second largest IPO in J-REIT history. There are a couple of<br />

other REITs planning IPOs later this year.<br />

JPY tn<br />

1.0<br />

0.5<br />

0.0<br />

<strong>RREEF</strong> REAL ESTATE <strong>Japan</strong> <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Estate</strong> <strong>Third</strong> <strong>Quarter</strong> <strong>2012</strong> | July <strong>2012</strong><br />

Exhibit 12 — Capital Raising and Transaction by REITs in <strong>Japan</strong><br />

Notes: This table is prepared solely for information purposes and not intended to recommend or endorse any specific company's shares or other products. All<br />

figures provided are based on publicly available documents not DB estimates.<br />

Sources: ARES, Nikkei, <strong>RREEF</strong> <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Estate</strong><br />

As of July <strong>2012</strong><br />

Exhibit 13 shows the share of the acquisition volume by J-REITs out of all the commercial<br />

real estate transactions in <strong>Japan</strong>. The J-REIT’s transactions accounted for 38 percent of<br />

the market in the six months leading to March <strong>2012</strong>, almost the same level as the<br />

previous period and higher than the historical average of 30 percent. The ratio is expected<br />

to increase even more in the next quarter. The volume of asset purchases by J-REITs<br />

was JPY462.9 billion in the first half of the year, including JPY200.7 billion purchased in<br />

conjunction with the new two IPOs. This represented a 49.5 percent increase from the<br />

same period last year.<br />

Exhibit 13 — <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Estate</strong> Transactions in <strong>Japan</strong> and J-REIT share<br />

Sources: ARES, Urban Research Institute, <strong>Real</strong> Capital Analytics, <strong>RREEF</strong> <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Estate</strong><br />

As of July <strong>2012</strong><br />

2001.09<br />

2002.03<br />

2002.09<br />

2003.03<br />

2003.09<br />

2004.03<br />

2004.09<br />

2005.03<br />

2005.09<br />

2006.03<br />

2006.09<br />

2007.03<br />

2007.09<br />

2008.03<br />

2008.09<br />

2009.03<br />

2009.09<br />

2010.03<br />

2010.09<br />

2011.03<br />

2011.09<br />

<strong>2012</strong>.03<br />

<strong>2012</strong>.06<br />

(JPY tn)<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

-1<br />

Bond<br />

3rd Party Allotment<br />

Public Offering<br />

IPO<br />

2000.09<br />

2001.03<br />

2001.09<br />

acquisition by others<br />

acquisition by J-REITs<br />

disposition by J-REITs<br />

2002.03<br />

2002.09<br />

2003.03<br />

2003.09<br />

2004.03<br />

2004.09<br />

net acquisition<br />

by J-REITs<br />

2005.03<br />

2005.09<br />

2006.03<br />

2006.09<br />

2007.03<br />

2007.09<br />

2008.03<br />

Recent Public Offerings (JPY bn)<br />

Name of REIT Month Amount<br />

Kenedix Rresidential Apr-12 13.6<br />

Activia Properties Jun-12 95.4<br />

Total<br />

109.0<br />

Scheduled J-REIT IPOs (JPY bn)<br />

Sponsor (asset type) Month Amount<br />

Aeon (retail) mid <strong>2012</strong> 100.0><br />

GLP (logistic) mid <strong>2012</strong> 125.0<br />

Daiwa House (logistic) late <strong>2012</strong> 90.0<br />

2008.09<br />

2009.03<br />

2009.09<br />

J-REIT share (%) of<br />

all transactions (RHS)<br />

2010.03<br />

2010.09<br />

2011.03<br />

2011.09<br />

<strong>2012</strong>.03<br />

<strong>2012</strong>.06<br />

45%<br />

30%<br />

15%<br />

0%<br />

-15%<br />

9


Market Fundamentals<br />

Office<br />

There were 37 newly completed office buildings in Central Tokyo 1 within the last twelve<br />

months, according to Miki Shoji, and the continuous new supply pushed up the vacancy<br />

rate to all-time high of 9.4 percent in June <strong>2012</strong>. The vacancy rate for newly developed<br />

buildings was especially high, at close to 40 percent. A mild recovery in the vacancy rate<br />

is expected in the second half of the year as the supply level moderates.<br />

<strong>RREEF</strong> REAL ESTATE <strong>Japan</strong> <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Estate</strong> <strong>Third</strong> <strong>Quarter</strong> <strong>2012</strong> | July <strong>2012</strong><br />

Exhibit 14 — Office Vacancy Rate in Central Tokyo (5 wards)<br />

Sources: Miki Shoji, <strong>RREEF</strong> <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Estate</strong><br />

As of July <strong>2012</strong><br />

Because of the increase in new supply, the vacancy rate for larger assets rose from 5.8<br />

percent to 6.6 percent in June <strong>2012</strong>. This remains a much lower vacancy rate than for<br />

smaller buildings, as demand is stronger for larger, newer, and higher quality spaces.<br />

Exhibit 15 — Office Vacancy Rate in Central Tokyo by Building Floor Plate Size<br />

12%<br />

8%<br />

4%<br />

0%<br />

Vacancy rate for all buildings<br />

Sources: Sanko <strong>Estate</strong>, <strong>RREEF</strong> <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Estate</strong><br />

As of July <strong>2012</strong><br />

20 %<br />

15 %<br />

10 %<br />

5 %<br />

0 %<br />

2002<br />

2003<br />

all buildings (LHS) new buildings (RHS)<br />

2004<br />

1 Central Tokyo is defined as the central five wards of Chiyoda, Chuo, Minato, Shinjuku, and Shibuya.<br />

2005<br />

2006<br />

2007<br />

2008<br />

2009<br />

2010<br />

2011<br />

<strong>2012</strong><br />

Forecast<br />

40 %<br />

30 %<br />

20 %<br />

10 %<br />

floor plate : 165 sqm - 330sqm floor plate : 330 sqm - 660 sqm<br />

floor plate > 660 sqm<br />

1996.03<br />

1996.09<br />

1997.03<br />

1997.09<br />

1998.03<br />

1998.09<br />

1999.03<br />

1999.09<br />

2000.03<br />

2000.09<br />

2001.03<br />

2001.09<br />

2002.03<br />

2002.09<br />

2003.03<br />

2003.09<br />

2004.03<br />

2004.09<br />

2005.03<br />

2005.09<br />

2006.03<br />

2006.09<br />

2007.03<br />

2007.09<br />

2008.03<br />

2008.09<br />

2009.03<br />

2009.09<br />

2010.03<br />

2010.09<br />

2011.03<br />

2011.09<br />

<strong>2012</strong>.03<br />

<strong>2012</strong>.09<br />

0 %<br />

newly developed buildings<br />

10


Office rental growth rates correlate inversely to the vacancy rate. Historically in Tokyo,<br />

office rents start to increase when the vacancy rate falls below 5 percent, so as vacancy<br />

rates for buildings with floor plates of 660 square meters or over moved up to 6.6 percent<br />

in Tokyo, the corresponding rents declined accordingly.<br />

Exhibit 16 — Vacancy Rate and Rent Growth in Tokyo (floor plate < 660 sqm)<br />

Sources: Sanko <strong>Estate</strong>, NLI Research Institute, <strong>RREEF</strong> <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Estate</strong><br />

As of July <strong>2012</strong><br />

Due to the record high vacancy rate and continuous supply of new spaces, office rents in<br />

Tokyo are still falling modestly for most building classes. Rents for average quality<br />

benchmark buildings are not expected to stabilise until 2013.<br />

Exhibit 17 — Office Asking Rent in Central Tokyo by Building Floor Plate Size<br />

Notes: F = forecast. The tsubo is a traditional measure of floor area in <strong>Japan</strong>. It is equivalent to 3.3 square metres (35.6 square feet)<br />

Sources: Miki Shoji, Sanko <strong>Estate</strong>, <strong>RREEF</strong> <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Estate</strong><br />

As of July <strong>2012</strong><br />

<strong>RREEF</strong> REAL ESTATE <strong>Japan</strong> <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Estate</strong> <strong>Third</strong> <strong>Quarter</strong> <strong>2012</strong> | July <strong>2012</strong><br />

8%<br />

4%<br />

0%<br />

-4%<br />

-8%<br />

-12%<br />

Actual Rent Growth (QoQ, 3Q rolling avg.) Vacancy Rate (RHS)<br />

1994.12<br />

1995.06<br />

1995.12<br />

1996.06<br />

1996.12<br />

1997.06<br />

1997.12<br />

1998.06<br />

1998.12<br />

1999.06<br />

1999.12<br />

2000.06<br />

2000.12<br />

2001.06<br />

2001.12<br />

2002.06<br />

2002.12<br />

2003.06<br />

2003.12<br />

2004.06<br />

2004.12<br />

2005.06<br />

2005.12<br />

2006.06<br />

2006.12<br />

2007.06<br />

2007.12<br />

2008.06<br />

2008.12<br />

2009.06<br />

2009.12<br />

2010.06<br />

2010.12<br />

2011.06<br />

2011.12<br />

<strong>2012</strong>.06<br />

(JPY/tsubo*/mon) (USD/sqf/year)<br />

50,000<br />

40,000<br />

30,000<br />

20,000<br />

10,000<br />

floor plate < 165 sqm<br />

Prime<br />

Buildings in CBD<br />

floor plate > 660 sqm<br />

Benchmark<br />

floor plate > 330 sqm<br />

Newly built buildings<br />

floor plate > 330 sqm<br />

floor plate > 165 sqm<br />

1994<br />

1995<br />

1996<br />

1997<br />

1998<br />

1999<br />

2000<br />

2001<br />

2002<br />

2003<br />

2004<br />

2005<br />

2006<br />

2007<br />

2008.03<br />

2008.06<br />

2008.09<br />

2008.12<br />

2009.03<br />

2009.06<br />

2009.09<br />

2009.12<br />

2010.03<br />

2010.06<br />

2010.09<br />

2010.12<br />

2011.03<br />

2011.06<br />

2011.09<br />

2011.12<br />

2011.03<br />

<strong>2012</strong>.06<br />

1%<br />

3%<br />

5%<br />

7%<br />

9%<br />

11%<br />

182<br />

<strong>RREEF</strong> Forecast<br />

<strong>2012</strong>.12F<br />

145<br />

109<br />

73<br />

11


Office vacancy rates peaked in major regional cities in <strong>Japan</strong> in 2009 and have been in a<br />

mild recovery trend since then. Contrary to Tokyo, new office supply has been limited in<br />

these cities. In Osaka, for example, the vacancy rate declined to 10.1 percent in June<br />

<strong>2012</strong>, but this may be a short-lived trend. Osaka’s vacancy rate is likely to rise again<br />

within the coming year as some large new completions are expected, including<br />

Nakanoshima Festival Tower (completion planned in October <strong>2012</strong>, GFA 2 146,000sqm),<br />

Daibiru Honkan (February 2013, GFA 48,000sqm) and Grand Front Osaka A/B (March<br />

2013, NRA 3 236,800sqm).<br />

<strong>RREEF</strong> REAL ESTATE <strong>Japan</strong> <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Estate</strong> <strong>Third</strong> <strong>Quarter</strong> <strong>2012</strong> | July <strong>2012</strong><br />

Exhibit 18 — Office Vacancy Rates in Major Cities in <strong>Japan</strong> (all grades)<br />

(%)<br />

16<br />

14<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

Sources: Miki Shoji, <strong>RREEF</strong> <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Estate</strong><br />

As of July <strong>2012</strong><br />

Retail<br />

The average asking retail rents for major high streets in Tokyo showed resilience in early<br />

<strong>2012</strong>. Rents are largely stable in most sub markets for the last two quarters, if not<br />

recovering. The number of foreign tourists to <strong>Japan</strong> fell only by 4 percent in the three-<br />

month period ending in May, compared to the same period two years ago (before the<br />

earthquake). High street rents are expected to remain flat throughout this year.<br />

Exhibit 19 — Average High Street Retail Asking Rents in Tokyo and Osaka<br />

Sources: Attractors Lab, Miki Shoji, <strong>RREEF</strong> <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Estate</strong><br />

As of July <strong>2012</strong><br />

1997<br />

2 GFA = gross floor area<br />

3 NRA = net rentable area<br />

1998<br />

(JPY/tsubo/mon)<br />

50,000<br />

40,000<br />

30,000<br />

20,000<br />

10,000<br />

Sapporo Fukuoka Nagoya Osaka Tokyo<br />

1999<br />

2000<br />

2001<br />

2002<br />

2003<br />

2004<br />

2005<br />

2006<br />

Ginza Omotesando Shinjuku<br />

Shibuya Shinsaibashi Office (Central Tokyo)<br />

2008.03<br />

2008.06<br />

2008.09<br />

2008.12<br />

2009.03<br />

2009.06<br />

2009.09<br />

2009.12<br />

2010.03<br />

2007<br />

2010.06<br />

2008<br />

2010.09<br />

2009<br />

2010.12<br />

2010<br />

2011.03<br />

2011<br />

2011.06<br />

<strong>2012</strong>.03<br />

2011.09<br />

<strong>2012</strong>.06<br />

2011.12<br />

<strong>2012</strong>.03<br />

12


Retail sales in the properties with large-scale formats remained firm in April and May<br />

<strong>2012</strong>. Sales at shopping centres and department stores increased by 0.4 percent and 0.2<br />

percent respectively in the period (on an existing store basis) over last year. Sales are<br />

expected to stabilise towards the end of the year.<br />

-5%<br />

-10%<br />

-15%<br />

<strong>RREEF</strong> REAL ESTATE <strong>Japan</strong> <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Estate</strong> <strong>Third</strong> <strong>Quarter</strong> <strong>2012</strong> | July <strong>2012</strong><br />

5%<br />

0%<br />

Exhibit 20 — Retail Sales Growth in <strong>Japan</strong> (year on year)<br />

Sources: JCSC, JDSA, JCSA, <strong>RREEF</strong> <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Estate</strong><br />

As of July <strong>2012</strong><br />

Residential<br />

The average sales price per unit for new built-for-sale condos in Greater Tokyo has been<br />

flat at around JPY 45 to 46 million for the last three quarters. This reflects softer demand<br />

after the initial rush to take advantage of an extended mortgage tax break implemented in<br />

2009. The contract rate 4 (orange line in Chart 21) stood at 78.7 percent in April/May <strong>2012</strong>,<br />

well above the threshold 70 percent level which is associated with healthy market<br />

conditions. We expect a mild recovery in condo prices in the latter half of the year in<br />

accordance with the recent recovery in consumer sentiment.<br />

Exhibit 21 — Newly-built Condo Unit Price and Contract Rate in Greater Tokyo<br />

Sources: REEI, <strong>RREEF</strong> <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Estate</strong><br />

As of July <strong>2012</strong><br />

2000<br />

2001<br />

2002<br />

2003<br />

2004<br />

2005<br />

2006<br />

2007<br />

2008.03<br />

2008.06<br />

2008.09<br />

2008.12<br />

2009.03<br />

2009.06<br />

2009.09<br />

2009.12<br />

2010.03<br />

2010.06<br />

2010.09<br />

2010.12<br />

2011.03<br />

2011.06<br />

2011.09<br />

2011.12<br />

<strong>2012</strong>.03<br />

<strong>2012</strong>.05<br />

50<br />

45<br />

40<br />

35<br />

Shopping Centre Department Store Chain Store<br />

(for existing stores for all categories)<br />

4 The contract rate is the ratio of units contracted (sold) to the number of units delivered for sale.<br />

Avg. unit price (LHS) Contract rate (RHS)<br />

(JPY mn/unit) (%)<br />

1995<br />

1996<br />

1997<br />

1998<br />

1999<br />

2000<br />

2001<br />

2002<br />

2003<br />

2004<br />

2005<br />

2006<br />

2007.03<br />

2007.06<br />

2007.09<br />

2007.12<br />

2008.03<br />

2008.06<br />

2008.09<br />

2008.12<br />

2009.03<br />

2009.06<br />

2009.09<br />

2009.12<br />

2010.03<br />

2010.06<br />

2010.09<br />

2010.12<br />

2011.03<br />

2011.06<br />

2011.09<br />

2011.12<br />

<strong>2012</strong>.03<br />

<strong>2012</strong>.05<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

13


Because of the limited development of new residential rental units in Tokyo in the last two<br />

years, the vacancy rate has recovered and is now approaching its long-term average of<br />

10 percent for all assets in the 23-ward area, and below 4 percent for assets held by J-<br />

REITs. Asking rents show positive year-on-year growth in the central 5-ward area (blue<br />

bar in Exhibit 22), especially in the popular locations of Shibuya and Minato, while they<br />

remained level in the broader 23-ward area of Tokyo.<br />

(Index)<br />

109<br />

<strong>RREEF</strong> REAL ESTATE <strong>Japan</strong> <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Estate</strong> <strong>Third</strong> <strong>Quarter</strong> <strong>2012</strong> | July <strong>2012</strong><br />

106<br />

103<br />

100<br />

97<br />

Exhibit 22 — Residential Rent and Vacancy in Tokyo<br />

Notes: The tsubo is a traditional measure of floor area in <strong>Japan</strong>. It is equivalent to 3.3 square metres (35.6 square feet)<br />

Sources: TAS Corporation with data sourced from At Home Co. Ltd. (23-ward vacancy), Leasing Management Consulting (5-ward asking rent), IPD-RECRUIT<br />

Residential Index (23-ward rent index)<br />

As of July <strong>2012</strong><br />

The high-end residential market correlates closely with the office leasing market. This<br />

high-end segment of the market is strongly affected by business conditions of the<br />

corporate sector, especially the financial services. The vacancy rate of high-end<br />

apartments in Tokyo was 9.1 percent in the second quarter of <strong>2012</strong>, while average high-<br />

end residential rents declined by 1.6 percent from the previous quarter. The financial<br />

sector, still weak from recession, signals the potential for a further mild decline in high-end<br />

residential rents this year.<br />

Exhibit 23 — High-end Residential Rent and Vacancy Rate in Tokyo<br />

Sources: Ken <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Estate</strong> Investment Advisors Ltd., Miki Shoji, <strong>RREEF</strong> <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Estate</strong><br />

As of July <strong>2012</strong><br />

(JPY/tsubo)<br />

14,600<br />

14,200<br />

13,800<br />

13,400<br />

13,000<br />

23 ward Rent Index<br />

5 ward Asking Rent<br />

23 ward Vacancy (RHS)<br />

Vacancy at REIT (RHS)<br />

2005.03<br />

2005.06<br />

2005.09<br />

2005.12<br />

2006.03<br />

2006.06<br />

2006.09<br />

2006.12<br />

2007.03<br />

2007.06<br />

2007.09<br />

2007.12<br />

2008.03<br />

2008.06<br />

2008.09<br />

2008.12<br />

2009.03<br />

2009.06<br />

2009.09<br />

2009.12<br />

2010.03<br />

2010.04<br />

2010.05<br />

2010.06<br />

2010.07<br />

2010.08<br />

2010.09<br />

2010.10<br />

2010.11<br />

2010.12<br />

2011.01<br />

2011.02<br />

2011.03<br />

2011.04<br />

2011.05<br />

2011.06<br />

2011.07<br />

2011.08<br />

2011.09<br />

2011.10<br />

2011.11<br />

2011.12<br />

<strong>2012</strong>.01<br />

<strong>2012</strong>.02<br />

<strong>2012</strong>.03<br />

<strong>2012</strong>.04<br />

<strong>2012</strong>.05<br />

<strong>2012</strong>.06<br />

office rent high end residential rent<br />

(Yen/tsubo/month) (%)<br />

office vacancy high end residential vacancy<br />

25,000<br />

15<br />

22,000<br />

19,000<br />

16,000<br />

13,000<br />

10,000<br />

7,000<br />

1999<br />

2000<br />

2001<br />

2002<br />

2003<br />

2004<br />

2005<br />

2006<br />

Annually<br />

2007<br />

<strong>Quarter</strong>ly<br />

2008.03<br />

2008.06<br />

2008.09<br />

2008.12<br />

2009.03<br />

2009.06<br />

2009.09<br />

2009.12<br />

2010.03<br />

2010.06<br />

2010.09<br />

2010.12<br />

2011.03<br />

2011.06<br />

2011.09<br />

2011.12<br />

<strong>2012</strong>.03<br />

<strong>2012</strong>.06<br />

12<br />

9<br />

6<br />

3<br />

0<br />

(%)<br />

11<br />

9<br />

7<br />

5<br />

3<br />

14


Industrial<br />

In the last two and half years, the volume of new supply was limited to one third of the<br />

space supplied in the peak years (2007 to 2008). As a result, vacancy rates for industrial<br />

assets tightened to 1.9 percent in Greater Tokyo and to as low as 0.2 percent in Greater<br />

Osaka in the first quarter of <strong>2012</strong>. The defensive nature of these assets attracted<br />

domestic and foreign investors (see Exhibit 8.2). The volume of new completions will be<br />

about 50 percent above the long-term average of 600,000 square meters per annum in<br />

Greater Tokyo in <strong>2012</strong> and 2013, and the vacancy rate is expected to increase mildly in<br />

the medium term in both cities.<br />

20%<br />

15%<br />

10%<br />

<strong>RREEF</strong> REAL ESTATE <strong>Japan</strong> <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Estate</strong> <strong>Third</strong> <strong>Quarter</strong> <strong>2012</strong> | July <strong>2012</strong><br />

5%<br />

0%<br />

Exhibit 24 — Vacancy Rate of Multi-tenant Logistics<br />

Sources: Ichigo <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Estate</strong> Service, <strong>RREEF</strong> <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Estate</strong><br />

As of July <strong>2012</strong><br />

Given the limited availability of space, rents for logistics assets are still holding steady in<br />

Greater Tokyo and Greater Osaka, having moved little in the last 12 months. Despite<br />

favourable supply fundamentals, the outlook for rental growth will be limited in the<br />

foreseeable future as retailers and manufacturers, the main tenant industries, face their<br />

own cost-cutting pressures.<br />

Exhibit 25 — Logistics Rent in Greater Tokyo and Greater Osaka<br />

Sources: Ichigo <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Estate</strong> Service, <strong>RREEF</strong> <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Estate</strong><br />

As of July <strong>2012</strong><br />

2008.06<br />

2008.09<br />

(JPY/month/tsubo)<br />

5,000<br />

4,000<br />

3,000<br />

2,000<br />

1,000<br />

0<br />

2008.03<br />

2008.12<br />

2008.06<br />

2009.03<br />

2008.09<br />

Greater Tokyo Greater Osaka<br />

2008.12<br />

2009.06<br />

2009.03<br />

2009.09<br />

2009.06<br />

2009.12<br />

2010.03<br />

2010.06<br />

2010.09<br />

2010.12<br />

2011.03<br />

2011.06<br />

2011.09<br />

2011.12<br />

forecast by Ichigo<br />

<strong>2012</strong>.03<br />

Greater Tokyo Greater Osaka<br />

2009.09<br />

2009.12<br />

2010.03<br />

2010.06<br />

2010.09<br />

2010.12<br />

2011.03<br />

2011.06<br />

2011.09<br />

2011.12<br />

<strong>2012</strong>.03<br />

<strong>2012</strong>.12<br />

<strong>2012</strong>.12<br />

2013.12<br />

forecast by Ichigo<br />

2013.12<br />

15


Past Issues<br />

<strong>RREEF</strong> REAL ESTATE <strong>Japan</strong> <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Estate</strong> <strong>Third</strong> <strong>Quarter</strong> <strong>2012</strong> | July <strong>2012</strong><br />

Vol Year Publication Research Topic<br />

1<br />

Second <strong>Quarter</strong> Jun 08<br />

Making sense of the rental market in<br />

<strong>Japan</strong><br />

2 2008 <strong>Third</strong> <strong>Quarter</strong> Sep 08 Impact of the credit crunch<br />

3 Fourth <strong>Quarter</strong> Dec 08 Revitalisation of ailing J-REITs<br />

4<br />

2009<br />

First <strong>Quarter</strong> Mar 09 Tokyo office market in its global context<br />

5 Second <strong>Quarter</strong> Jul 09 <strong>Japan</strong> residential market<br />

6 <strong>Third</strong> <strong>Quarter</strong> Oct 09<br />

7 Fourth <strong>Quarter</strong> Jan 10<br />

8<br />

2010<br />

History repeats itself? A comparison of<br />

the ‘Year 2003 Problem’ with 2009<br />

Introducing unit pricing analysis in<br />

<strong>Japan</strong><br />

First <strong>Quarter</strong> Apr 10 Portfolio optimisation analysis in <strong>Japan</strong><br />

9 Second <strong>Quarter</strong> Jul 10<br />

10 <strong>Third</strong> <strong>Quarter</strong> Oct 10 <strong>Quarter</strong>ly Report<br />

11 Fourth <strong>Quarter</strong> Jan 11<br />

12<br />

First <strong>Quarter</strong> Apr 11<br />

2011<br />

13 Second <strong>Quarter</strong> Jul 11<br />

14 <strong>Third</strong> <strong>Quarter</strong> Oct 11 <strong>Quarter</strong>ly Report<br />

15<br />

16 <strong>2012</strong> Second <strong>Quarter</strong> Apr 12 <strong>Quarter</strong>ly Report<br />

<strong>Japan</strong>’s capital market in a global<br />

context<br />

Cross-border investment into and out of<br />

<strong>Japan</strong><br />

The Great Tohoku Earthquake and its<br />

impact on the <strong>Japan</strong>ese real estate<br />

market<br />

Adapting <strong>Japan</strong>’s land price index for<br />

real estate analysis<br />

First <strong>Quarter</strong> Jan 12 The J-REITs next 10 years<br />

17 <strong>Third</strong> <strong>Quarter</strong> Jul 12 <strong>Quarter</strong>ly Report<br />

16


Important Notes<br />

<strong>RREEF</strong> REAL ESTATE <strong>Japan</strong> <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Estate</strong> <strong>Third</strong> <strong>Quarter</strong> <strong>2012</strong> | July <strong>2012</strong><br />

Copyright © <strong>2012</strong> Deutsche Bank AG, Frankfurt am Main. All rights reserved. <strong>RREEF</strong> is the<br />

brand name of the real estate division for the asset management activities of Deutsche Bank AG.<br />

In the US this relates to the asset management activities of <strong>RREEF</strong> America L.L.C.; in Germany:<br />

<strong>RREEF</strong> Investment GmbH, <strong>RREEF</strong> Management GmbH, and <strong>RREEF</strong> Spezial Invest GmbH; in<br />

Australia: Deutsche Asset Management (Australia) Limited (ABN 63 116 232 154) Australian<br />

financial services license holder; in <strong>Japan</strong>: Deutsche Securities Inc.*; in Hong Kong: Deutsche<br />

Bank Aktiengesellschaft, Hong Kong Branch (for Direct <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Estate</strong> business), and Deutsche<br />

Asset Management Hong Kong (for <strong>Real</strong> <strong>Estate</strong> Securities Business); in Singapore: Deutsche<br />

Asset Management (Asia) Limited (Company Reg. No. 198701485N); and in the United<br />

Kingdom: Deutsche Alternative Asset Management (UK) Limited, Deutsche Alternative Asset<br />

Management (Global) Limited, and Deutsche Asset Management (UK) Limited; and in Denmark,<br />

Finland, Norway and Sweden: Deutsche Alternative Asset Management (UK) Ltd and Deutsche<br />

Alternative Asset Management (Global) Ltd; in addition to other regional entities in the Deutsche<br />

Bank Group. (*) For DSI, financial advisory, investment advisory, and distribution services only.<br />

Key <strong>RREEF</strong> research personnel are voting members of various <strong>RREEF</strong> investment committees.<br />

Members of the investment committees vote with respect to underlying investments and/or<br />

transactions and certain other matters subjected to a vote of such investment committee.<br />

Additionally, research personnel receive, and may in the future receive incentive compensation<br />

based on the performance of a certain investment accounts and investment vehicles managed<br />

by <strong>RREEF</strong> and its affiliates.<br />

This material is intended for informational purposes only and it is not intended that it be relied on<br />

to make any investment decision. It does not constitute investment advice or a recommendation<br />

or an offer or solicitation and is not the basis for any contract to purchase or sell any security or<br />

other instrument, or for Deutsche Bank AG and its affiliates to enter into or arrange any type of<br />

transaction as a consequence of any information contained herein. Neither Deutsche Bank AG<br />

nor any of its affiliates gives any warranty as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of<br />

information which is contained in this document. Except insofar as liability under any statute<br />

cannot be excluded, no member of the Deutsche Bank Group, the Issuer or any officer,<br />

employee or associate of them accepts any liability (whether arising in contract, in tort or<br />

negligence or otherwise) for any error or omission in this document or for any resulting loss or<br />

damage whether direct, indirect, consequential or otherwise suffered by the recipient of this<br />

document or any other person.<br />

The views expressed in this document constitute Deutsche Bank AG or its affiliates’ judgment at<br />

the time of issue and are subject to change. This document is only for professional investors.<br />

This document was prepared without regard to the specific objectives, financial situation or<br />

needs of any particular person who may receive it. No further distribution is allowed without prior<br />

written consent of the Issuer.<br />

An investment in real estate involves a high degree of risk and is suitable only for sophisticated<br />

investors who can bear substantial investment losses. The value of shares/units and their<br />

derived income may fall as well as rise. Past performance or any prediction or forecast is not<br />

indicative of future results.<br />

The forecasts provided are based upon our opinion of the market as at this date and are subject<br />

to change, dependent on future changes in the market. Any prediction, projection or forecast on<br />

the economy, stock market, bond market or the economic trends of the markets is not<br />

necessarily indicative of the future or likely performance.<br />

17


Office Locations:<br />

Frankfurt<br />

Mainzer Landstraße 178-190<br />

60327 Frankfurt am Main<br />

Germany<br />

Tel: +49 69 71704 0<br />

London<br />

One Appold Street<br />

London EC2A 2UU<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Tel: +44 20 754 58000<br />

New York<br />

345 Park Avenue<br />

24th Floor<br />

New York<br />

NY 10154-0102<br />

United States<br />

Tel:+1 212 454 6260<br />

Paris<br />

Floor 4<br />

3 Avenue de Friedland<br />

Paris<br />

France<br />

Tel: +33 1 44 95 63 80<br />

San Francisco<br />

101 California Street<br />

26th Floor<br />

San Francisco<br />

CA 94111<br />

United States<br />

Tel:+1 415 781 3300<br />

Singapore<br />

One Raffles Quay<br />

South Tower<br />

048583 Singapore<br />

Tel: +65 6423 8385<br />

Tokyo<br />

Floor 17<br />

Sanno Park Tower<br />

2-11-1 Nagata-cho<br />

Chiyoda-Ku<br />

Tokyo<br />

<strong>Japan</strong><br />

Tel:+81 3 5156 6000<br />

Global Research Team<br />

Global<br />

Mark Roberts<br />

Global Head of Research<br />

mark-g.roberts@rreef.com<br />

Americas<br />

Marc Feliciano<br />

Chief Investment Officer, Americas<br />

marc.feliciano@rreef.com<br />

Ross Adams<br />

Industrial Specialist<br />

ross.adams@rreef.com<br />

Bill Hersler<br />

Office Specialist<br />

bill.hersler@rreef.com<br />

Ana Leon<br />

Property Market Research<br />

ana.leon@rreef.com<br />

Europe<br />

Simon Durkin<br />

Head of Research, Europe<br />

simon.durkin@rreef.com<br />

Gianluca Muzzi<br />

Chief Investment Officer, Europe<br />

gianluca.muzzi@rreef.com<br />

Jaroslaw Morawski<br />

Property Market Research<br />

jaroslaw.morawski@rreef.com<br />

Nazanin Nobahar<br />

Property Market Research<br />

nazanin.nobahar@rreef.com<br />

Asia Pacific<br />

Leslie Chua<br />

Head of Research, Asia Pacific ex-<strong>Japan</strong>/Korea<br />

leslie.chua@rreef.com<br />

Koichiro Obu<br />

Head of Research, <strong>Japan</strong>/Korea<br />

koichiro.obu@rreef.com<br />

Kurt W Roeloffs<br />

Global Chief Investment Officer<br />

kurt.w.roeloffs@rreef.com<br />

Andrew J. Nelson<br />

Retail Specialist<br />

andrewj.nelson@rreef.com<br />

Alex Symes<br />

Economic & Quantitative Analysis<br />

alex.symes@rreef.com<br />

Brooks Wells<br />

Apartment Specialist<br />

brooks.wells@rreef.com<br />

Arezou Said<br />

Property Market Research<br />

arezou.said@rreef.com<br />

Maren Vaeth<br />

Property Market Research<br />

maren.vaeth@rreef.com<br />

Simon Wallace<br />

Property Market Research<br />

simon.wallace@rreef.com<br />

Natasha Lee<br />

Property Market Research<br />

natasha-j.lee@rreef.com<br />

www.rreef.com<br />

I-028630-1.0

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!