18.02.2018 Views

How-to-Write-a-Better-Thesis

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Dotting the ‘i’s and Crossing the ‘t’s<br />

135<br />

Whichever system you use, you should include a full list of sources such as papers<br />

in journals or chapters of books that have been cited. The list should be in alphabetical<br />

order of authors’ surnames, and should contain sufficient detail <strong>to</strong> enable the<br />

reader <strong>to</strong> find the material in a library. You should check your list for three things:<br />

• Is your reference list in alphabetical order?<br />

• Do the entries conform <strong>to</strong> an established style? 3<br />

• Do all the references cited in the text appear in the list?<br />

You should head this list simply as ‘References’ in the style of a chapter heading. 4<br />

This list is often placed after the chapters but before any appendices, presumably on<br />

the grounds that the appendices really are something tacked on <strong>to</strong> the end. As the<br />

appendices themselves may have references, there is a case for reversing this order.<br />

If you leave the references in the cus<strong>to</strong>mary place, you should devise some logical<br />

method for overcoming this problem, perhaps by having a short list of relevant<br />

references at the end of each appendix. Check <strong>to</strong> see that you have dealt with this<br />

problem adequately.<br />

Appendices<br />

You may have ended up with a rather mixed bag of appendices after completing<br />

your first draft. Some of them will have been written for very good and valid reasons<br />

<strong>to</strong> support material in the text. Others may be lef<strong>to</strong>vers from earlier thinking,<br />

and because you were rather attached <strong>to</strong> them you were loath <strong>to</strong> throw them out.<br />

• Check your appendices against these rules, and throw out any that are no longer<br />

justifiable.<br />

• Check the presentation of each appendix that you decide <strong>to</strong> keep, as follows: (a)<br />

Does it start on a new page? (b) Does it have a title that indicates what it is all<br />

about? (Just calling it ‘Appendix 3’ is not good enough). (c) Is the style used for<br />

the title the same as that used for chapter headings?<br />

• Is there a preamble that explains briefly what its function is and what it is all<br />

about?<br />

• Does the preamble refer <strong>to</strong> part of the main text? If it doesn’t, find the part of the<br />

text that it supports and make reference <strong>to</strong> it. If you can’t find it, or if the connection<br />

is very weak, throw out the appendix al<strong>to</strong>gether.<br />

3<br />

The order in which the various components are given, and the styles used <strong>to</strong> distinguish book<br />

titles, journal names, and so on, varies from discipline <strong>to</strong> discipline. You should find the method<br />

used in your discipline and stick <strong>to</strong> it; be very consistent. Departments will often have a preferred<br />

method.<br />

4<br />

Some people prefer <strong>to</strong> call it Bibliography. A list of references contains only material that is specifically<br />

referred <strong>to</strong> in your thesis, whereas a bibliography may contain other material of interest,<br />

but not specifically referred <strong>to</strong>. For a thesis, References is preferable.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!