How-to-Write-a-Better-Thesis
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
22 3 Mechanics of Writing<br />
I recommend that you find good models and imitate them. Remember <strong>to</strong>o that<br />
tables are sometimes copied and used out of context—in slides, lecture notes, and<br />
so on—so they should be reasonably independent of the text. That is, take the effort<br />
<strong>to</strong> create captions and headings that make them at least somewhat comprehensible<br />
on their own.<br />
Similar comments apply <strong>to</strong> figures, that is, graphs and artwork. (Illustrations are<br />
discussed further in Chap. 8.) If your word-processing package has a reasonably<br />
sophisticated graphics or line art system, you might consider using it <strong>to</strong> draw your<br />
figures. This method has the advantage that you can edit the figures at a later date in<br />
the light of rewriting or alteration of the text. <strong>How</strong>ever, you will have <strong>to</strong> accept the<br />
limitations of the inbuilt graphics system, which may be significant. Alternatively,<br />
you can draw all your figures using a separate specialized graphics package, and<br />
import them electronically in<strong>to</strong> your text. You can’t edit them while they are in<br />
your word processor, but you can delete them, go back <strong>to</strong> the original version in the<br />
graphics package, edit that, then re-import.<br />
If you are using charts generated by a spreadsheet program or a statistical package,<br />
these <strong>to</strong>o can be imported in<strong>to</strong> your text. If you want <strong>to</strong> plot your data, enter it 2<br />
in<strong>to</strong> such a package rather than attempting <strong>to</strong> create a graph with a line art <strong>to</strong>ol—<br />
such plots are amateurish at best—and take advantage of the facilities that these<br />
packages provide for displaying data in a variety of useful formats and perspectives.<br />
Don’t assume that the standard layout provided by the software is going <strong>to</strong> be best<br />
for your data; you may want <strong>to</strong> use colours, different kinds of labelling, different<br />
kinds of ways of representing quantities, and so on.<br />
Whichever method you use, ensure consistency of style within the figures, especially<br />
if there is written material actually on the figures themselves, such as labels<br />
on the axes of graphs. You should produce the captions of all your figures, <strong>to</strong>gether<br />
with any explana<strong>to</strong>ry material and references <strong>to</strong> sources, in a consistent style, using<br />
your word-processing package. Note that it is cus<strong>to</strong>mary <strong>to</strong> put the caption <strong>to</strong> a table<br />
above the table, but <strong>to</strong> put the caption <strong>to</strong> a figure below it.<br />
There are numerous texts on how <strong>to</strong> present figures and diagrams; Edward<br />
Tufte’s books are exemplary. There are also good online resources. For line art,<br />
there seems <strong>to</strong> be a widespread attitude that quick enough is good enough. Where<br />
once the diligent researcher had <strong>to</strong> rely on the skills of a graphic artist <strong>to</strong> produce<br />
suitable illustrations, now anyone, including small children, can access simple line<br />
art <strong>to</strong>ols. Used carelessly, the result does indeed often look like the work of children,<br />
from cute 3 use of inappropriate clipart <strong>to</strong> lack of logical organization. It is like people<br />
believing they are producing works of art because they take family snapshots<br />
with expensive cameras.<br />
Your tables and figures are intended <strong>to</strong> convey the key messages of your thesis,<br />
so give them the time and care that such messages require. I continue <strong>to</strong> be as<strong>to</strong>nished,<br />
and not in a good way, by the fact that students who labour for months or<br />
2<br />
Yes, data is an ‘it’—not a ‘them’—in this context, because I am not referring <strong>to</strong> a numerable<br />
quantity, or a set made up in a meaningful way of individual datums [sic], but <strong>to</strong> a form of information.<br />
Pedantry may be with ‘them’, but usage isn’t.<br />
3<br />
Here I use ‘cute’ in the sense that is closer <strong>to</strong> nauseating than <strong>to</strong> sweet. Please take the hint.