18.02.2018 Views

How-to-Write-a-Better-Thesis

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Research Questions and Hypotheses<br />

69<br />

ing skills. They may even need <strong>to</strong> conduct a preliminary investigation <strong>to</strong> further<br />

tease out and clarify questions. Accordingly, the right place for a precise statement<br />

of the research questions may indeed be at the point where the background chapters<br />

finish, and just before the start of the core of your own work, but the questions need<br />

<strong>to</strong> be stated in broad terms in your first chapter.<br />

Now, as for hypotheses, let me tell you about Daud, who came <strong>to</strong> me wishing <strong>to</strong><br />

do a Masters. When I asked him what the aim of his project was, he replied that it<br />

was <strong>to</strong> demonstrate that development in his home country, one of the African nations,<br />

depended crucially on the adequate provision of household energy supplies.<br />

This is a hypothesis, not an aim. (An aim here might be <strong>to</strong> investigate the relationship<br />

between national development and the availability of household energy supplies.)<br />

This confusion is very common. More often than not, when I ask potential<br />

research students what the aim of their research is, they reply with a hypothesis. The<br />

confusion seems <strong>to</strong> be due <strong>to</strong> a looseness of expression among research workers<br />

when talking about research. As discussed in Chap. 2, research is a complex mixture<br />

of creative and rational processes. As a result, it is quite common <strong>to</strong> leap right in<strong>to</strong><br />

the middle of the research process with a hypothesis, and work backwards <strong>to</strong> the<br />

aim and forwards <strong>to</strong> the conclusions at the same time.<br />

<strong>How</strong>ever, no matter how irrational and chancy an actual investigation is, the<br />

output of research must be written such that it is argued logically and clearly. Therefore<br />

you must eliminate any confusion between aim and hypothesis. An aim is <strong>to</strong> do<br />

with directing something <strong>to</strong>wards an object, whereas a hypothesis is a proposition<br />

made as a starting point for further investigation from known facts. 1 Clearly the two<br />

words have quite different meanings, and should not be used interchangeably.<br />

To be fair <strong>to</strong> Daud, he was not really confusing the two things. He was giving me<br />

hypotheses, or propositions that could be tested. He had perceived problems, and<br />

had developed hypotheses about them in his unconscious thoughts over a period of<br />

time, long before he had come <strong>to</strong> me <strong>to</strong> propose a plan for research. When he came<br />

<strong>to</strong> see me he had not yet worked his way back from a hypothesis <strong>to</strong> an aim. He was<br />

focused on what he could do in his study, rather than what he was trying <strong>to</strong> achieve.<br />

When I explain the difference, referring <strong>to</strong> the dictionary if necessary, students<br />

often reply that their aim is <strong>to</strong> ‘prove’ their hypothesis. This is not an aim either!<br />

Proving is what we do <strong>to</strong> hypotheses, at least in the sense of ‘proving’ as testing<br />

(as in ‘proving ground’). A hypothesis is a device that enables researchers <strong>to</strong> set up<br />

useful tests or experiments that will tell them whether they are on the right track. It<br />

is not the arrow pointing <strong>to</strong> the destination.<br />

A suggestion, then, is that you not use the word ‘hypothesis’ in the opening<br />

chapter of your thesis. In a recent seminar a student <strong>to</strong>ld me that her supervisor said<br />

1<br />

GW Turner (ed.), The Australian Concise Oxford Dictionary, Oxford University Press, Melbourne,<br />

1987. ‘Consider an archer: her aim is <strong>to</strong> put the arrow in the bull’s eye. She might have a<br />

hypothesis that if she was shooting in a northerly direction and the wind was blowing from the east<br />

at 10 m per second she would have <strong>to</strong> shoot at a point 2° <strong>to</strong> the right of the bull’s eye. She could<br />

quite easily test this hypothesis by shooting a group of arrows at the bull’s eye and another group<br />

2° <strong>to</strong> the right. When she had tested her hypothesis she would be in a better position <strong>to</strong> achieve her<br />

original aim, which was <strong>to</strong> get arrows in the bull’s eye.’

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!