28.02.2018 Views

Advice for the Muslim

ADVICE FOR THE MUSLIM Brief passages from the reputed books of ahl as-sunnat scholars are quoted for refuting corrupt Wahhabi and la-madhhabiyya beliefs.

ADVICE FOR THE MUSLIM

Brief passages from the reputed books of ahl as-sunnat scholars are quoted for refuting corrupt Wahhabi and la-madhhabiyya beliefs.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

his wife by tayy al-makân. It is possible (jâ’iz) that such a man<br />

might be a man of karâma. This has been unanimously declared<br />

by <strong>the</strong> ’ulamâ’ of fiqh and noted in books of ’aqâ’id, too. The book<br />

Wahhâbiyya writes: “Tayy al-masâfa, that is, traversing long<br />

distances in a moment, is a karâma bestowed upon awliyâ’. It is<br />

wâjib to believe in this.” This fact is also written in An-Nasafî, Alfiqh<br />

al-akbar, As-siwâd al-a’zam, Wasiyyatu Abî Yûsuf, Mawâqif<br />

and Maqâsid and commentaries on <strong>the</strong>m [and in Radd al-muhtâr].<br />

Why should it not be believed while it is stated openly in <strong>the</strong> âyat<br />

al-karîma? The ’ulamâ’ of Ahl as-Sunna based this contention on<br />

an âyat karîma. The event, as reported in <strong>the</strong> âyat, that <strong>the</strong> throne<br />

of Bilqîs was brought do Damascus in a moment verifies that tayy<br />

al-masâfa is a karâma.<br />

The karâmât of awliyâ’ are finely explained in <strong>the</strong> 32nd article<br />

of <strong>the</strong> book As-siwâd al-a’zam by Hakîm as-Samarqandî Is’haq<br />

ibn Muhammad (rahimah-Allâhu ta’âlâ), whom we thought it<br />

proper to quote: “It is necessary to believe in <strong>the</strong> karâmât of<br />

awliyâ’. Anyone who does not believe in <strong>the</strong>ir karâmât becomes<br />

a man of bid’a, a heretic. There are two kinds of disbelieving in<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir karâmât: one becomes a kâfir if he disbelieves <strong>the</strong> âyats<br />

which narrate karâmât; if he believes in <strong>the</strong> âyats but says, ‘They<br />

were prophets,’ again he becomes a kâfir. If one believes in <strong>the</strong><br />

âyats and does not say that <strong>the</strong>y were prophets, it is permissible<br />

<strong>for</strong> him to say, ‘The âyats narrate <strong>the</strong> karâmât of awliyâ’.’ For this<br />

reason, Allâhu ta’âlâ declares in <strong>the</strong> [above-mentioned] âyat that<br />

<strong>the</strong> one who brought <strong>the</strong> throne of Bilqîs in a moment was a<br />

learned man. That learned man was Âsaf ibn Barhiyâ. He was a<br />

walî. He was not a prophet. He belonged to <strong>the</strong> umma of<br />

Sulaimân (’alaihi ’s-salâm). While a karâma of one among <strong>the</strong><br />

umma of Sulaimân (’alaihi ’s-salâm) is narrated in <strong>the</strong> Qur’ân alkarîm,<br />

why should it not be believed that <strong>the</strong> umma of<br />

Muhammad (’alaihi ’s-salâm) have karâmât? Certainly<br />

Muhammad (’alaihi ’s-salâm) is superior to Sulaimân (’alaihi ’ssalâm)<br />

and <strong>the</strong> <strong>for</strong>mer’s umma is superior to that of <strong>the</strong> latter. If<br />

<strong>the</strong> lâ-madhhabî say, ‘This karâma belonged to Sulaimân (’alaihi<br />

’s-salâm),’ we say, ‘The karâmât of this umma are of Muhammad<br />

(alaihi ’s-salâm) as an answer. Allâhu ta’âlâ declares: ‘Pull <strong>the</strong><br />

date-wood to yourself! Therefrom fresh dates will fall <strong>for</strong> you,’ in<br />

<strong>the</strong> 24th âyat al-karîma of Sûrat al-Mariam. Allâhu ta’âlâ reveals<br />

that He grew fruit from <strong>the</strong> dry date-Wood <strong>for</strong> Hadrat Mariam.<br />

who was not a prophet. The fruits which Zakariyyâ (’alaihi ’ssalâm)<br />

saw beside Hadrat Mariam and <strong>the</strong> event of As’hâb al-kahf<br />

– 177 –

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!