14.06.2018 Views

Trade facilitation and paperless trade implementation in Latin America and the Caribbean: Regional Report 2017

The Global Survey on Trade Facilitation and Paperless Trade Implementation (“Global Survey”) is a global effort led by the Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP) in collaboration with all of the United Nations Regional Commissions, namely, the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), the Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia (ESCWA), the Economic Commission for Africa (ECA) and the Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). The goal of the Global Survey is to gather information from the member states of the respective United Nations Regional Commissions on trade facilitation and paperless trade measures and strategies implemented at the national and regional levels. The results of the survey will enable countries and development partners to better understand and monitor progress on trade facilitation, support evidence-based public policies, share best practices and identify capacity building and technical assistance needs.

The Global Survey on Trade Facilitation and Paperless Trade Implementation (“Global Survey”) is a global effort led by the Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP) in collaboration with all of the United Nations Regional Commissions, namely, the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), the Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia (ESCWA), the Economic Commission for Africa (ECA) and the Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). The goal of the Global Survey is to gather information from the member states of the respective United Nations Regional Commissions on trade facilitation and paperless trade measures and strategies implemented at the national and regional levels. The results of the survey will enable countries and development partners to better understand and monitor progress on trade facilitation, support evidence-based public policies, share best practices and identify capacity building and technical assistance needs.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 6<br />

Average <strong>implementation</strong> rates of <strong>trade</strong> <strong>facilitation</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>paperless</strong> <strong>trade</strong> measures<br />

<strong>in</strong> LAC by category, 2015 <strong>and</strong> <strong>2017</strong><br />

(In percentages of <strong>the</strong> maximum possible score)<br />

Formalities<br />

Transparency<br />

73<br />

80<br />

78<br />

78<br />

Paperless <strong>trade</strong><br />

Institutional arrangements<br />

<strong>and</strong> cooperation<br />

56<br />

52<br />

72<br />

73<br />

<strong>2017</strong><br />

2015<br />

Cross-border <strong>paperless</strong> <strong>trade</strong><br />

47<br />

46<br />

0 20 40 60 80 100<br />

Source: Author, with data from <strong>the</strong> Global Survey on <strong>Trade</strong> Facilitation <strong>and</strong> Paperless <strong>Trade</strong> Implementation 2015 <strong>and</strong> <strong>2017</strong>.<br />

Figure 7<br />

Average <strong>implementation</strong> rates of <strong>trade</strong> <strong>facilitation</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>paperless</strong> <strong>trade</strong> categories <strong>and</strong> measures, <strong>2017</strong><br />

(In percentages of <strong>the</strong> maximum possible score)<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Transparency Formalities Institutional<br />

arrangements <strong>and</strong><br />

cooperation<br />

Paperless <strong>trade</strong><br />

Cross-border<br />

<strong>paperless</strong> <strong>trade</strong><br />

Source: Author, on <strong>the</strong> basis of data from <strong>the</strong> Global Survey on <strong>Trade</strong> Facilitation <strong>and</strong> Paperless <strong>Trade</strong> Implementation <strong>2017</strong>.<br />

Note: The blue l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong>dicate average <strong>implementation</strong> rates for each category; red dots correspond to average <strong>implementation</strong><br />

rates for <strong>in</strong>dividual measures.<br />

26

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!