14.06.2018 Views

Trade facilitation and paperless trade implementation in Latin America and the Caribbean: Regional Report 2017

The Global Survey on Trade Facilitation and Paperless Trade Implementation (“Global Survey”) is a global effort led by the Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP) in collaboration with all of the United Nations Regional Commissions, namely, the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), the Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia (ESCWA), the Economic Commission for Africa (ECA) and the Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). The goal of the Global Survey is to gather information from the member states of the respective United Nations Regional Commissions on trade facilitation and paperless trade measures and strategies implemented at the national and regional levels. The results of the survey will enable countries and development partners to better understand and monitor progress on trade facilitation, support evidence-based public policies, share best practices and identify capacity building and technical assistance needs.

The Global Survey on Trade Facilitation and Paperless Trade Implementation (“Global Survey”) is a global effort led by the Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP) in collaboration with all of the United Nations Regional Commissions, namely, the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), the Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia (ESCWA), the Economic Commission for Africa (ECA) and the Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). The goal of the Global Survey is to gather information from the member states of the respective United Nations Regional Commissions on trade facilitation and paperless trade measures and strategies implemented at the national and regional levels. The results of the survey will enable countries and development partners to better understand and monitor progress on trade facilitation, support evidence-based public policies, share best practices and identify capacity building and technical assistance needs.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure 8<br />

Largest variations <strong>in</strong> average <strong>implementation</strong> rates of <strong>trade</strong> <strong>facilitation</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>paperless</strong><br />

<strong>trade</strong> measures <strong>in</strong> LAC between 2015 <strong>and</strong> <strong>2017</strong><br />

(In percentage po<strong>in</strong>ts)<br />

Establishment of National <strong>Trade</strong> Facilitation Committee<br />

Acceptance of paper or electronic copies of documents<br />

Stakeholder consultation on new draft regulations<br />

<strong>Trade</strong> <strong>facilitation</strong> measures for authorized operators<br />

Separation of Release from f<strong>in</strong>al determ<strong>in</strong>ation of customs duties<br />

Electronic Submission of Air Cargo Manifests<br />

Electronic exchange of Certificate of Orig<strong>in</strong><br />

Electronic exchange of Sanitary & Phyto-Sanitary Certificate<br />

Pre-arrival process<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Recognised certification authorities issue digital certificates<br />

Electronic S<strong>in</strong>gle W<strong>in</strong>dow System<br />

Advance rul<strong>in</strong>g (on tariff classification)<br />

Laws <strong>and</strong> regulations for electronic transactions<br />

Electronic appl. & issuance of preferential certificate of orig<strong>in</strong><br />

Government agencies delegat<strong>in</strong>g controls to Customs authorities<br />

-15<br />

-7<br />

-8<br />

-8<br />

-8<br />

-8<br />

19<br />

16<br />

13<br />

12<br />

10<br />

10<br />

9<br />

8<br />

25<br />

-20 -10 0 10 20 30<br />

Source: Author, with data from <strong>the</strong> Global Survey on <strong>Trade</strong> Facilitation <strong>and</strong> Paperless <strong>Trade</strong> Implementation 2015 <strong>and</strong> <strong>2017</strong>.<br />

B. Transparency measures<br />

The transparency measures <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Global Survey are based on Articles 1 through 4 of <strong>the</strong> TFA.<br />

These measures perta<strong>in</strong> to publication of import <strong>and</strong> export regulations on <strong>the</strong> Internet, stakeholder<br />

consultation on new draft regulations, advance publication or notification of new regulations prior to<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir entry <strong>in</strong>to force, advance rul<strong>in</strong>gs, <strong>and</strong> an <strong>in</strong>dependent mechanism for <strong>trade</strong>rs to appeal rul<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

from Customs <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r relevant <strong>trade</strong> control agencies. These measures are based on, <strong>and</strong> exp<strong>and</strong><br />

upon, <strong>the</strong> commitments conta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> Article X of <strong>the</strong> General Agreement on Tariffs <strong>and</strong> <strong>Trade</strong> (GATT)<br />

which address, among o<strong>the</strong>r th<strong>in</strong>gs, Customs <strong>and</strong> classification matters.<br />

Collectively, transparency measures allow <strong>trade</strong>rs to play a role <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> legislative process, have<br />

predictability <strong>in</strong> Customs matters, <strong>and</strong> have <strong>the</strong> right to a legal review of Customs rul<strong>in</strong>gs. In this area, Lat<strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>America</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Caribbean</strong> (21 countries) obta<strong>in</strong>s an overall <strong>implementation</strong> rate of 78%, same as <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Global Survey 2015. Most progress has been made on <strong>the</strong> availability of an <strong>in</strong>dependent appeal mechanism<br />

(89% <strong>implementation</strong> rate), with 16 countries report<strong>in</strong>g full <strong>implementation</strong>, 4 report<strong>in</strong>g partial<br />

<strong>implementation</strong> <strong>and</strong> only one (Antigua <strong>and</strong> Barbuda) report<strong>in</strong>g no <strong>implementation</strong> so far (see figure 9).<br />

Countries across <strong>the</strong> region have taken different approaches to <strong>implementation</strong>. In some cases, <strong>the</strong>y have<br />

established Customs <strong>and</strong>/or tax courts with exclusive jurisdiction; <strong>in</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r cases, countries have exp<strong>and</strong>ed<br />

<strong>the</strong> jurisdiction of already exist<strong>in</strong>g local <strong>and</strong>/or national court systems to <strong>in</strong>clude Customs matters.<br />

28

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!