14.06.2018 Views

Trade facilitation and paperless trade implementation in Latin America and the Caribbean: Regional Report 2017

The Global Survey on Trade Facilitation and Paperless Trade Implementation (“Global Survey”) is a global effort led by the Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP) in collaboration with all of the United Nations Regional Commissions, namely, the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), the Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia (ESCWA), the Economic Commission for Africa (ECA) and the Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). The goal of the Global Survey is to gather information from the member states of the respective United Nations Regional Commissions on trade facilitation and paperless trade measures and strategies implemented at the national and regional levels. The results of the survey will enable countries and development partners to better understand and monitor progress on trade facilitation, support evidence-based public policies, share best practices and identify capacity building and technical assistance needs.

The Global Survey on Trade Facilitation and Paperless Trade Implementation (“Global Survey”) is a global effort led by the Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP) in collaboration with all of the United Nations Regional Commissions, namely, the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), the Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia (ESCWA), the Economic Commission for Africa (ECA) and the Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). The goal of the Global Survey is to gather information from the member states of the respective United Nations Regional Commissions on trade facilitation and paperless trade measures and strategies implemented at the national and regional levels. The results of the survey will enable countries and development partners to better understand and monitor progress on trade facilitation, support evidence-based public policies, share best practices and identify capacity building and technical assistance needs.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

preferential certificates of orig<strong>in</strong>, <strong>the</strong> explanation for this drop rests largely <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> different set of<br />

participat<strong>in</strong>g countries. In particular, Sur<strong>in</strong>am, which reported full <strong>implementation</strong> <strong>in</strong> 2015, did not<br />

participate <strong>in</strong> <strong>2017</strong>, while several of <strong>the</strong> new participants <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>2017</strong> survey reported no<br />

<strong>implementation</strong> of this measure (Antigua <strong>and</strong> Barbuda) or be<strong>in</strong>g at <strong>the</strong> pilot stage (Jamaica, Sa<strong>in</strong>t Kitts<br />

<strong>and</strong> Nevis, <strong>and</strong> Sa<strong>in</strong>t V<strong>in</strong>cent <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Grenad<strong>in</strong>es).<br />

For those countries where electronic application <strong>and</strong> issuance of <strong>trade</strong> permits is at a partial<br />

level of fulfillment, country data suggests that this reflects one or more of <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g possibilities: (i)<br />

not every permit is available electronically; (ii) permits are available ei<strong>the</strong>r for export or import (but not<br />

both); (iii) not all relevant public agencies that can issue permits are equipped to do so electronically; or<br />

(iv) notwithst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g electronic application <strong>and</strong> issuance, physical copies must still be exchanged<br />

between <strong>the</strong> <strong>trade</strong>r <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> relevant agency.<br />

Two related measures —electronic payment of Customs duties <strong>and</strong> fees <strong>and</strong> electronic<br />

application for Customs refunds— exhibit opposite results. E-payment, based on Article 7.2 of <strong>the</strong> TFA,<br />

states that countries, to <strong>the</strong> extent practicable, shall adopt or ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> procedures allow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> option<br />

of electronic payment for duties, taxes, fees, <strong>and</strong> charges collected by Customs <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>curred upon<br />

importation <strong>and</strong> exportation. For this measure, <strong>the</strong> region presents a 79% rate of <strong>implementation</strong>, with<br />

very high rates <strong>in</strong> South <strong>America</strong> <strong>and</strong> Central <strong>America</strong> <strong>and</strong> Mexico (100% <strong>and</strong> 94%, respectively) <strong>and</strong> a<br />

much lower one <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Caribbean</strong> (43%, down from 50% <strong>in</strong> 2015). The reason for this drop is essentially<br />

<strong>the</strong> same expla<strong>in</strong>ed above for o<strong>the</strong>r measures.<br />

The electronic application for Customs refunds has by far <strong>the</strong> lowest rate of <strong>implementation</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />

this category at only 29%, marg<strong>in</strong>ally up from 26% <strong>in</strong> 2015, <strong>and</strong> is one of <strong>the</strong> least implemented<br />

measures <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Global Survey. Sub-regional <strong>implementation</strong> levels differ sharply: 54% <strong>in</strong> South <strong>America</strong><br />

(unchanged from 2015), aga<strong>in</strong>st only 17% <strong>in</strong> Central <strong>America</strong> <strong>and</strong> Mexico (up from 10% <strong>in</strong> 2015) <strong>and</strong> just<br />

10% <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Caribbean</strong> (up from 0% <strong>in</strong> 2015). Only Brazil, Chile, Mexico <strong>and</strong> Uruguay reported full<br />

<strong>implementation</strong> of this measure, with Argent<strong>in</strong>a, Cuba <strong>and</strong> Peru <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g partial <strong>implementation</strong>. The<br />

rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g fourteen participat<strong>in</strong>g countries have not implemented it at all <strong>and</strong> no evidence was provided<br />

of pilot stage efforts.<br />

Across all measures, South <strong>America</strong> has <strong>the</strong> highest rate of <strong>implementation</strong> with an average of<br />

83%, followed by Central <strong>America</strong> <strong>and</strong> Mexico (76%) <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Caribbean</strong> (56%). The areas <strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Caribbean</strong> trails <strong>the</strong> most are <strong>the</strong> electronic payment of Customs duties <strong>and</strong> fees, <strong>the</strong> electronic s<strong>in</strong>gle<br />

w<strong>in</strong>dow, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> electronic application <strong>and</strong> issuance of import <strong>and</strong> export permits (see figure 16).<br />

38

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!