You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
International Orthoptic<br />
Congress <strong>2016</strong><br />
BY MIRIAM LANGESLAG-SMITH*<br />
RANZCO & Specsavers?<br />
In this modern, commercial<br />
world we are seeing ever more<br />
collaboration between large<br />
groups, commercial operations,<br />
medical-insurers and so on.<br />
The AA collaboration with<br />
Specsavers offering ‘free eye tests’ for<br />
AA members and the similarly free<br />
eye exams being offered by OPSM to<br />
Southern Cross medical insurance<br />
members are good examples.<br />
There are various other such things<br />
promoted by loyalty schemes and so<br />
on. In some parts of the world it is<br />
even more complex with a variety of<br />
players involved. Some professions<br />
are also being ‘controlled’ by either<br />
being in an affiliated provider<br />
scheme or not. Ophthalmology too<br />
has had such arrangements ‘forced’<br />
on it. In recent times we have seen<br />
Southern Cross ‘forbid’ its members<br />
from having femtosecond aided<br />
cataract surgery, to the point that if<br />
a patient elected to have this option<br />
done - at their own cost - they were<br />
then told the medical insurer would<br />
not cover any of the cataract surgery!<br />
This is in my view crazy and smacks<br />
of being unjust and unfair and one<br />
wonders if there are vested interests<br />
or political issues at play? It makes<br />
no difference to their cost if the<br />
patient elects to have what they may<br />
deem a more advanced option to<br />
their surgery. This has led to some of<br />
the groups who shelled out on such<br />
advanced equipment literally having<br />
a million dollar white elephant<br />
wasting valuable theatre space. One<br />
group even sent their laser unit back<br />
to the provider.<br />
I don’t like being economically<br />
forced to have to ‘choose’ a certain<br />
provider of medical services, which<br />
may not be my first choice or the<br />
best choice, simply due to financial<br />
considerations. When I joined<br />
Southern Cross that was not one of<br />
the conditions but now it is being<br />
forced on me. Of course the insurers<br />
will tell you that this is to keep costs<br />
under control but there’s more to it<br />
than that.<br />
As we know loyalty schemes are<br />
designed to make us more inclined<br />
to deal with certain companies<br />
that reward us for our loyalty. It can<br />
certainly lock one in. It does in some<br />
cases have benefits but at other times<br />
it can make it more hassle or cost<br />
more to stay with say a certain airline.<br />
I don’t agree with such control<br />
of relationships and the proposed<br />
RANZCO-Specsavers collaboration<br />
(see news story p6) will not<br />
likely foster or enhance good<br />
relations between optometry and<br />
ophthalmology.<br />
Although RANZCO mentions<br />
Specsavers as the largest group<br />
in retail optometry they do not<br />
represent the majority. All told<br />
OPSM commands about one third<br />
of the optometry market with<br />
independents another third and<br />
Specsavers also about one third.<br />
I believe RANZCO have made a<br />
mistake in how they went about<br />
this initiative, as it should have been<br />
inclusive of the whole profession. I<br />
do note RANZCO’s point of it being a<br />
good test vehicle for their scheme as<br />
Specavers run pretty much the same<br />
systems throughout their network<br />
of ‘stores’. Surely that should have<br />
been a clue to RANZCO as they are<br />
talking about high level medical<br />
collaboration not retail business that<br />
takes place in stores?<br />
There are many independent<br />
practitioners who I believe could<br />
have made an excellent contribution<br />
to this process and their speciality<br />
practices may in fact have been a<br />
better vehicle to gather the valuable<br />
data, which is what RANZCO claims<br />
to be seeking.<br />
Although the collaboration does<br />
not seem to be a commercial<br />
arrangement – and they do state that<br />
the referral guidelines and education<br />
are open to all optometrists – it still<br />
does not sit well with the people I’ve<br />
had feedback from.<br />
At any rate I gather there are moves<br />
afoot to create a more level playing<br />
field and potentially we may see<br />
some alterations to this proposal<br />
over the next while.<br />
It’s also been interesting to note<br />
that Specsavers have tried to<br />
trademark the word ‘Should’ve’ as<br />
used in their clever ‘Should’ve gone<br />
to Specsavers’ advertisements (which<br />
is already trademarked). Some people<br />
think this is ridiculous and that they<br />
are unlikely to succeed. ▀<br />
Acuity chart for AMD<br />
A<br />
team<br />
of researchers from<br />
Ulster, Moorfields Eye Hospital<br />
and Auckland have developed<br />
a new acuity chart to detect early<br />
signs of macular degeneration, called<br />
the Moorfields Acuity Chart.<br />
With age-related macular<br />
degeneration (AMD) still the leading<br />
cause of sight loss in Western<br />
countries, having an easy to use,<br />
early detection test will result in<br />
much better outcomes for AMD<br />
patients. Until now letter charts<br />
have not been consistent or sensitive<br />
enough to give an early diagnosis or<br />
to monitor progress.<br />
The research team, which included<br />
Professor Steven Dakin from the<br />
School of Optometry and Vision<br />
Science at the University of Auckland,<br />
worked on the new acuity chart. The<br />
chart uses letters built up from fine<br />
black-and-white stripes, as previous<br />
research showed these ‘high-pass’<br />
letters are more equally readable<br />
than standard letters, but also that<br />
they appear to vanish altogether<br />
when they are too small to be<br />
recognised.<br />
In a study published in the British<br />
Journal of Ophthalmology, the<br />
sensitivity of the Moorfields Acuity<br />
Chart was compared with the<br />
standard test in 80 AMD patients<br />
and 38 people with normal vision.<br />
The results showed the Moorfields<br />
chart was more reliable from one<br />
test to the next for people with<br />
AMD, but not the participants with<br />
normal vision.<br />
Sir Peng Tee Khaw, director of<br />
the NIHR Moorfields Biomedical<br />
Research Centre said, “This marks<br />
a significant advancement in our<br />
ability to diagnose vision loss arising<br />
from the leading cause of sight loss<br />
in industrialised countries. This is<br />
exciting for us all as improved testing<br />
methods lead to better diagnosis and<br />
treatment development.” ▀<br />
From the 27 to 30 June <strong>2016</strong>, 700 members of the<br />
International Orthoptic Association (IOA) from 42<br />
countries met in Rotterdam in the Netherlands to share<br />
their research, knowledge and experiences in and around<br />
the world of orthoptics at the XIIIth International Orthoptic<br />
Congress. Among the attendees were three orthoptists from<br />
New Zealand: Karen Fyles from MidCentral District Health<br />
Board, Gisela Rademaker from Timaru Eye Clinic and myself,<br />
Miriam Langeslag-Smith from Counties Manukau Health.<br />
The Congress is held every four years and is attended not<br />
only by orthopists, but also ophthalmologists, researchers<br />
and educators, fitting with the theme, “Bridging Worlds”<br />
where bridges between the different fields related to<br />
orthoptics are being built.<br />
This year the Congress was held at De Doelen International<br />
Congress Centre in the heart of Rotterdam. Rotterdam is a<br />
dynamic city with a lively cultural scene and long maritime<br />
history, and the largest cargo port in Europe. The near-complete<br />
destruction of Rotterdam’s city centre during World War II has<br />
resulted in a varied architectural landscape. On a more personal<br />
level, Rotterdam is the city where I started my working career<br />
as an orthoptist many moons ago. It was great to be back in<br />
familiar surroundings although in an ever-evolving city like<br />
Rotterdam a lot had changed since I worked here.<br />
The first day of the Congress started with an education<br />
session for attendees who are educating orthoptics students,<br />
residents, medical students or other ophthalmic personnel,<br />
and two workshops. The first focused on the change in the<br />
personal and professional identities of orthoptists across<br />
the world, demonstrating that many orthoptists now have<br />
expanded roles in their practices. The first orthoptist to be<br />
accredited to perform intravitreal injection is an example<br />
of this. The second workshop was about assessment and<br />
intervention in cerebral visual impairment in children.<br />
The following three days were filled with three invited<br />
symposia from IOA partners: the International Paediatric<br />
& Strabismus Council; the International Strabismological<br />
Association; and the World Society of Paediatric<br />
Ophthalmology and Strabismus. There were 76 oral<br />
presentations, 20 rapid-fire poster presentations and 84<br />
posters divided into 12 different themed blocks, with themes<br />
such as binocular vision, low vision, technology in eye<br />
disease, strabismus and neuro-ophthalmology, just to name<br />
a few. I had the privilege of presenting in the amblyopia block<br />
on Amblyopia improves more than just visual acuity, which<br />
included results of a study I conducted as part of my master’s<br />
degree at the University of Auckland. I also had two posters in<br />
the theme block Expanding orthoptic practice, one with Carly<br />
Henley from Auckland DHB who unfortunately was unable to<br />
attend the Congress.<br />
The Congress was completely paperless. All delegates<br />
had free WiFi access and were encouraged to download a<br />
Welcome to the XIIIth IOA Congress in Rotterdam<br />
CentraSight training in NZ<br />
CentraSight, the ground-breaking macular<br />
degeneration treatment that inserts a tiny telescope<br />
into a patient’s eye, now has a formal point of<br />
contact in New Zealand - specialist low vision consultant,<br />
Naomi Meltzer.<br />
Meltzer, based in Auckland and a former partner at Barry<br />
and Beale optometrists for 30 years, says she’s always<br />
had a special interest in low vision. She took a diploma<br />
in rehabilitation at Massey in 2009 to help her low vision<br />
patients and, while she was on the course, met Paula<br />
Daye, the outgoing CEO of the NZ Foundation of the Blind.<br />
Together they set up the Sight Loss Services Charitable<br />
Trust, to provide information, equipment and support to<br />
New Zealanders with low vision and their families, and to<br />
promote better understanding of low vision in the wider<br />
community. She also helped establish the NZ Association of<br />
Optometrists’ accreditation for optometrists in low vision,<br />
which became available earlier this year.<br />
Today Meltzer runs a specialist low vision practice, Low<br />
Vision Services, and it was while she was contacting low<br />
vision specialists in the UK that she was put in touch with<br />
Graham Brown, director of CentraSight.<br />
“I’d heard of CentraSight through Rodney Stedall, one of<br />
the optometrists already trained to do assessments in New<br />
Zealand.” says Meltzer. “Graham was going to be in New<br />
Zealand, to be present at (Tauranga ophthalmologist) Mike<br />
O’Rourke’s first CentraSight operation, so we arranged to<br />
meet.”<br />
From that initial meeting, Meltzer entered the UK-based<br />
training programme to become an optometrist qualified to<br />
assess and rehabilitate patients.<br />
“The success of the treatment is reliant upon a rigorous<br />
screening of candidates and good post-operative<br />
rehabilitation, as well as excellent communication between<br />
the surgeon, the patient and the low vision optometrist,”<br />
she explains. “Once they’ve had the implant, the patient<br />
needs to be trained to use their implanted eye for detail and<br />
their other eye for getting around. It’s not for everyone.”<br />
designated congress app on their smartphones or tablets,<br />
which showed which presentation or event was going on in<br />
real time. There was even the ability to add your own notes<br />
on the online presentations.<br />
Overall the presentations were of a high calibre and covered<br />
a wide variety of subjects. There were many highlights for me,<br />
too many to name here, but one that did stand out was the<br />
need for consistency around the world in naming orthoptic<br />
disorders. People naïve to visual experiments respond very<br />
differently to “visual experts” therefore we should not be<br />
using orthoptic/optometry students as a control group in<br />
ophthalmology research.<br />
Not all the presentations were on new and novel research,<br />
which was good as they confirmed previous findings,<br />
refreshed subjects and brought forward knowledge that over<br />
the years may have gone to the back of our minds.<br />
Although the orthoptist market is still very small, 13 exhibitors<br />
took part in the Congress, many displaying novel products.<br />
These included a redesigned picture visual acuity chart, a<br />
new strabismus test, electronic amblyopia treatment glasses,<br />
research and examination equipment and children’s glasses.<br />
Besides the very interesting presentations, there was also<br />
time to relax and socialise. The social side of the Congress<br />
was, as always, a great opportunity to catch up with<br />
colleagues, old class mates and friends from around the<br />
world. The welcome reception, VIP reception and Congress<br />
dinner at St. Laurenskerk, or Great Church of Rotterdam, plus<br />
the lovely buffet lunches with ample Dutch delicacies, were<br />
the perfect times to do just that. For the very keen, there was<br />
even a morning run through Rotterdam on the third day.<br />
The next IOA Congress will be in June 2020 in Liverpool in<br />
the UK. It would be great if we can have more New Zealand<br />
orthoptists attending this very worthwhile and inspiring<br />
Congress. If you can’t make it to Liverpool, perhaps you can<br />
make it to Lisbon, Portugal in 2024. ▀<br />
*Miriam Langeslag-Smith is an orthoptist with Counties Manukau DHB.<br />
While Meltzer wasn’t<br />
the first optometrist<br />
to qualify – Rodney<br />
Stedall from Paterson<br />
Burn Hamilton was the<br />
first and Lynley Smith<br />
from Langford Callard<br />
in Tauranga the second<br />
– it became clear to<br />
CentraSight she was well<br />
set up to be the contact<br />
point for the whole of<br />
Australasia and assist<br />
Naomi Meltzer<br />
with the training of other<br />
teams in this part of the world.<br />
“My experience in low vision, plus the fact I already have<br />
a dedicated low vision practice and an 0800 number for<br />
people from all over the country to phone for advice, made<br />
me the ideal candidate for this role,” says Meltzer, who is<br />
going to be helping CentraSight train other optometrists for<br />
the CentraSight programme. “But I am in touch with both<br />
Rodney and Lynley, and we are continuing to learn together.”<br />
The CentraSight surgery isn’t a switch that suddenly turns<br />
on good vision, warns Meltzer. “There’s a lot of work to be<br />
done both before and after the operation to rehabilitate the<br />
patient and their motivation, as well as additional health<br />
concerns, travel and finances all have to be considered. But<br />
for those patients who fit the criteria, CentraSight offers the<br />
ability to recognise family members’ faces, read a book and<br />
see other detail, which they may not have been able to do<br />
for a long time, either at all or without magnification.” ▀<br />
If you are an optometrist with a patient you’d like to refer<br />
for assessment, or you are interested in finding out more<br />
about training yourself, you can contact Naomi Meltzer<br />
by calling 0800 555546. CentraSight surgery is currently<br />
offered by Mike O’Rouke at Tauranga Eye Specialists and<br />
Dr Stephen Guest at Hamilton Eye Clinic. The equipment is<br />
distributed by Toomac.<br />
24 NEW ZEALAND OPTICS <strong>Sep</strong>tember <strong>2016</strong>