You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Bionic eye goes commercial<br />
The bionic eye system, IRIS II, developed by<br />
French company Pixum Vision, has been<br />
awarded the CE mark. This 150-electrode<br />
epiretinal implant features a design intended to be<br />
explantable and upgradeable, and is now CE-mark<br />
approved for people with vision loss from outer<br />
retinal degeneration.<br />
“The CE mark certification is a major step forward<br />
for Pixium Vision and for retinal dystrophy patients<br />
who have lost their sight,” said Khalid Ishaque,<br />
CEO of Pixium Vision. “This recognition by an<br />
independent expert body validates the longterm<br />
multidisciplinary work that has resulted<br />
in market approval of the IRIS II system. We<br />
will continue to develop our bionic vision<br />
systems with the aim to deliver improved<br />
visual perception and help retinal dystrophy<br />
patients lead more independent lives.”<br />
The IRIS II features a bio-inspired camera<br />
intended to mimic the functioning of the<br />
human eye; an epiretinal implant with 150<br />
electrodes, almost three times the number<br />
of electrodes than the previous version; and<br />
an explantable design – the electrode array<br />
is secured on the retinal surface by a support<br />
system that is intended to allow for future<br />
replacements or upgrades.<br />
Clinical trials are currently underway in Germany,<br />
Austria and France. Moorfields Eye Hospital in<br />
London received approval from the UK regulatory<br />
authority MHRA to launch their own clinical trial<br />
at the end of May. The focus right now is on IRIS II<br />
as a solution for retinitis pigmentosa patients, said<br />
the company, adding it was also working on an<br />
implant for AMD patients. ▀<br />
New doc for Timaru<br />
Hawke’s Bay<br />
ophthalmologist, Dr<br />
Muhammad Khalid has<br />
now filled the long-vacant role<br />
of Timaru ophthalmologist for,<br />
a presumably-much relieved,<br />
South Canterbury District<br />
Health Board (SCDHB).<br />
Talking to NZ Optics in<br />
August, shortly before<br />
moving to Timaru to take up<br />
his new role, Dr Khalid said<br />
he was excited about the<br />
new position and getting<br />
back to being part of a small<br />
community once again.<br />
“My father was a GP in a<br />
small town. I feel comfortable in and understand<br />
smaller communities so I will enjoy being part of<br />
one again.”<br />
Dr Khalid says a smaller community offers a lot<br />
more opportunities to get to know people and<br />
to help solve a multitude of different problems,<br />
problems you might not be exposed to from an<br />
eye-health perspective as part of a larger team.<br />
With three young children in tow (a girl and<br />
two boys aged 13, 10 and 8), however, Dr Khalid<br />
admits it was an important decision for him and<br />
his wife, but they are all now looking forward to<br />
the move. “You don’t go to small communities<br />
like this to just work, you have to want to be a<br />
part of the community.”<br />
Dr Khalid has locumed in Timaru a few times<br />
over the past year since his predecessor, Dr<br />
Mike Mair’s retirement in July 2015. When<br />
he mentioned to people at<br />
SCDHB that he thought it<br />
was a great place and was<br />
surprised they hadn’t found<br />
anyone to replace Mike, they<br />
asked him to come in and<br />
consider it.<br />
SCDHB chief<br />
executive Nigel Trainor,<br />
talking to the Timaru Herald,<br />
said having Dr Khalid meant<br />
cataract surgery could once<br />
again be performed at<br />
Timaru Hospital and private<br />
alternatives would now be<br />
Dr Muhammed Kahlid at RANZCO NZ<br />
available through the eye<br />
in Dunedin in May<br />
clinic.<br />
“The search for an ophthalmololgist has been<br />
extensive and during this time Dr Khalid was<br />
able to provide support to South Canterbury<br />
DHB as a locum doctor. We are delighted that<br />
he liked what he saw and has decided to make<br />
the move to Timaru permanent. He brings with<br />
him extensive global experience and will be a<br />
real asset to the community,” said Trainor.<br />
Originally from Pakistan, Dr Khalid also<br />
trained in Ireland and obtained his fellowship<br />
in ophthalmology from the Royal College<br />
of Surgeons of Edinburgh. He also has a<br />
postgraduate degree in medicine from the<br />
National University of Ireland in Galway<br />
and a diploma from the European Board of<br />
Ophthalmology. He moved to New Zealand with<br />
his family in 2013 to be nearer to family in this<br />
part of the world. ▀<br />
RANZCO launches referral<br />
guides; signs Specsavers MoU<br />
The Royal<br />
Australian<br />
and New<br />
Zealand College of<br />
Ophthalmologists<br />
(RANZCO) has<br />
released the first of<br />
a series of planned<br />
referral guides for<br />
optometrists and<br />
GPs to help provide<br />
more effective and<br />
efficient patient<br />
care pathways<br />
and improve eye<br />
health outcomes<br />
for patients across<br />
Australasia.<br />
The first of the<br />
referral guidelines,<br />
looking at glaucoma<br />
management, was<br />
released at the beginning of August. Guidelines<br />
on diabetic retinopathy and age-related macular<br />
degeneration (AMD) are expected to be released<br />
in the near future, with other indications to be<br />
released later, following feedback.<br />
In a statement RANZCO said these referral<br />
guidelines do not favour and are not dependent<br />
upon any one particular practice referral system<br />
or methodology. “They simply provide a resource<br />
which lays out a suggested referral pathway if<br />
certain signs and/or symptoms are identified.<br />
The aim is to ensure patients receive the best<br />
care possible, in the most appropriate timeframe<br />
and from the appropriate healthcare provider.”<br />
The referral guidelines are based on peerreviewed<br />
publications about best practice in<br />
relation to referrals for symptoms and disease<br />
areas. “That said, we recognise that what works<br />
best in theory is not always what works best<br />
in practice and so we will be assessing the<br />
effectiveness and usability of the guidelines,”<br />
said Dr Bradley Horsburgh, RANZCO president.<br />
“We are all part of the eye healthcare system<br />
and it’s important that we deliver that as<br />
smoothly and effectively as possible for<br />
patients.”<br />
Dr David Andrews (RANZCO), Peter Larsen (Specsavers), Dr Bradley Horsburgh (RANZCO), Charles Hornor<br />
(Specsavers) and Dr Russell Bach (RANZCO) celebrate the agreement between RANZCO and Specsavers<br />
MoU with Specsavers<br />
Though RANZCO stressed it is seeking feedback<br />
from all optometrists, ophthalmologists and GPs<br />
who use the new referral guidelines, to ensure<br />
it gathers information quickly it has agreed<br />
a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU), or<br />
statement of intent, with Specsavers Australia<br />
and New Zealand to run a two-year pilot<br />
programme to gather metrics and data. “Given<br />
the number of Specsavers optometric practices,<br />
this pilot will allow us to efficiently gather data<br />
to assess the effectiveness of the guidelines,” said<br />
RANZCO.<br />
“Working with Specsavers does not limit<br />
the availability of the referral guidelines. The<br />
guidelines will be promoted and made widely<br />
available to all optometrists and GPs across<br />
Australia and New Zealand.”<br />
In a joint statement RANZCO and Specsavers<br />
said both parties will share resultant data with<br />
healthcare funding and management bodies<br />
to shed greater light on eye health and broader<br />
healthcare outputs.<br />
“With a growing and ageing population in<br />
both Australia and New Zealand we have a duty<br />
to ensure that there is ingrained collaboration<br />
between optometry and ophthalmology,” said<br />
Peter Larsen, Specsavers’ optometry director.<br />
“It is not enough to say we work together, we<br />
actually need to set ourselves specific areas of<br />
collaboration and measure the effectiveness<br />
and efficiency of that collaboration. This<br />
arrangement between Specsavers and RANZCO<br />
does just that, the goal being superior patient<br />
outcomes.”<br />
Larsen said the first discussions with RANZCO<br />
about using Specsavers’ ANZ network of<br />
optometrists to proactively review the guidelines<br />
took place in March. “And a meeting of minds<br />
quickly emerged, leading to this MoU.”<br />
RANZCO will be running training sessions on<br />
the guidelines at the <strong>2016</strong> RANZCO Congress<br />
in Melbourne in November for all optometrists<br />
and GPs who wish to attend, while Specsavers<br />
will be releasing more details about the MoU<br />
and what it means in practice for Specsavers’<br />
optometrists at its <strong>2016</strong> Clinical Conference in<br />
Brisbane this month.<br />
To download and review the first RANZCO<br />
Referral Pathway for Glaucoma Management go<br />
to: https://ranzco.edu/ophthalmology-and-eyehealth/collaborative-care/referral-pathway-forglaucoma-management<br />
▀<br />
How Pharmac makes funding decidions<br />
Clinical advice from experts is the bedrock of Pharmac’s medicines assessments,<br />
writes Medical Director Dr John Wyeth<br />
Advice from clinical experts is an important<br />
part of the Pharmac funding process.<br />
There are multiple ways in which health<br />
professionals provide input to our funding<br />
decisions. From trained medical professionals on<br />
Pharmac’s staff to experts on our specialist panels,<br />
and members of our clinical advisory committees<br />
and wider consultation, input from the medical<br />
profession is central to Pharmac’s decisions on<br />
medicine funding.<br />
Our main clinical committee is the Pharmacology<br />
and Therapeutics Advisory Committee (PTAC),<br />
which has 21 subcommittees in clinical<br />
specialities like cardiovascular disease, diabetes<br />
and ophthalmology. The key skills of our clinical<br />
committee members are reviewing and advising us<br />
on the evidence for the use of medicines in a New<br />
Zealand clinical setting.<br />
We’re sometimes asked why we need to seek<br />
advice on the evidence around medicines,<br />
when a lot of this work is already undertaken<br />
internationally. The answer is that we need to<br />
clearly understand the way a new medicine might<br />
be used in New Zealand. What are the currently<br />
favoured treatments in New Zealand that we<br />
are comparing the medicine under assessment<br />
with? We need to know we are using the right<br />
comparator in our assessment. Our advisory<br />
committee members can help answer this<br />
question, and they are also expected to use their<br />
clinical networks and experience to provide advice<br />
to Pharmac on all aspects of a medicine under<br />
consideration.<br />
All together, Pharmac has around 140 expert<br />
doctors and other health professionals providing<br />
formal advice on medicine funding applications – a<br />
considerable resource.<br />
Because New Zealand has a medicine funding<br />
environment with a defined budget, we can’t<br />
afford every medicine that is available on the<br />
market, so choices have to be made. We know<br />
there are high public expectations around<br />
accessing the ‘latest and greatest’ medicines, but<br />
we know in practice that these high expectations<br />
around effectiveness of new medicines don’t<br />
always play out. We need to carefully examine<br />
the evidence and take a dispassionate view of<br />
the medicines being looked at. We can’t spend<br />
the same dollar twice, so we need to make sure<br />
the choice we make is the one that gets the best<br />
health outcomes for New Zealanders.<br />
The main pathway to medicine funding is<br />
through the Pharmaceutical Schedule. This<br />
is the list of medicines funded for all eligible<br />
patients. A medicine considered for Schedule<br />
listing goes through a rigorous process<br />
involving the assessment of clinical evidence,<br />
pharmacoeconomic evaluation by Pharmac’s team<br />
of health economists and negotiation with the<br />
company that supplies the medicine. If we get<br />
to the point of a provisional agreement with a<br />
company, we then consult with the wider public.<br />
What we want to know is what benefit any new<br />
medicine has over and above the medicines that<br />
are already funded on the Schedule – and what<br />
will the additional cost of that benefit be?<br />
Pharmac’s commercial skills can provide benefits<br />
also. We’re hoping that’s the case with a process<br />
we’re currently running, which emerged from<br />
recommendations made by PTAC. Two anti-VEGF<br />
agents are currently listed for use in DHB hospitals<br />
for wet macular degeneration – bevacizumab<br />
(Avastin) and ranibizumab (Lucentis). In reviewing<br />
an application for another agent aflibercept, PTAC<br />
recommended Pharmac run a commercial process<br />
that might<br />
lead to further<br />
agents being<br />
listed. That<br />
process is now<br />
underway.<br />
Sometimes<br />
people have<br />
unusual clinical<br />
circumstances<br />
that might<br />
mean a funded<br />
medicine isn’t<br />
right for them,<br />
and there is<br />
Dr John Wyeth<br />
an unfunded<br />
medicine that<br />
is. Pharmac also has a process for assessing<br />
individual patient applications for unfunded<br />
medicines – the Named Patient Pharmaceutical<br />
Assessment (NPPA) process. Pharmac receives<br />
nearly 2000 applications a year under NPPA, most<br />
of which are approved. NPPA isn’t a mechanism<br />
to provide access to every unfunded medicine –<br />
it aims to fill a specific need for some patients<br />
whose clinical circumstances aren’t served by<br />
medicines listed on the Schedule.<br />
We encourage health professionals to get<br />
involved in Pharmac funding processes and<br />
have links with associations and societies. But<br />
any clinician can be part of our consultation<br />
database. We’d be happy to add you if you email<br />
consultation@pharmac.govt.nz ▀<br />
6 NEW ZEALAND OPTICS <strong>Sep</strong>tember <strong>2016</strong>