17.06.2018 Views

Sep 2016

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Bionic eye goes commercial<br />

The bionic eye system, IRIS II, developed by<br />

French company Pixum Vision, has been<br />

awarded the CE mark. This 150-electrode<br />

epiretinal implant features a design intended to be<br />

explantable and upgradeable, and is now CE-mark<br />

approved for people with vision loss from outer<br />

retinal degeneration.<br />

“The CE mark certification is a major step forward<br />

for Pixium Vision and for retinal dystrophy patients<br />

who have lost their sight,” said Khalid Ishaque,<br />

CEO of Pixium Vision. “This recognition by an<br />

independent expert body validates the longterm<br />

multidisciplinary work that has resulted<br />

in market approval of the IRIS II system. We<br />

will continue to develop our bionic vision<br />

systems with the aim to deliver improved<br />

visual perception and help retinal dystrophy<br />

patients lead more independent lives.”<br />

The IRIS II features a bio-inspired camera<br />

intended to mimic the functioning of the<br />

human eye; an epiretinal implant with 150<br />

electrodes, almost three times the number<br />

of electrodes than the previous version; and<br />

an explantable design – the electrode array<br />

is secured on the retinal surface by a support<br />

system that is intended to allow for future<br />

replacements or upgrades.<br />

Clinical trials are currently underway in Germany,<br />

Austria and France. Moorfields Eye Hospital in<br />

London received approval from the UK regulatory<br />

authority MHRA to launch their own clinical trial<br />

at the end of May. The focus right now is on IRIS II<br />

as a solution for retinitis pigmentosa patients, said<br />

the company, adding it was also working on an<br />

implant for AMD patients. ▀<br />

New doc for Timaru<br />

Hawke’s Bay<br />

ophthalmologist, Dr<br />

Muhammad Khalid has<br />

now filled the long-vacant role<br />

of Timaru ophthalmologist for,<br />

a presumably-much relieved,<br />

South Canterbury District<br />

Health Board (SCDHB).<br />

Talking to NZ Optics in<br />

August, shortly before<br />

moving to Timaru to take up<br />

his new role, Dr Khalid said<br />

he was excited about the<br />

new position and getting<br />

back to being part of a small<br />

community once again.<br />

“My father was a GP in a<br />

small town. I feel comfortable in and understand<br />

smaller communities so I will enjoy being part of<br />

one again.”<br />

Dr Khalid says a smaller community offers a lot<br />

more opportunities to get to know people and<br />

to help solve a multitude of different problems,<br />

problems you might not be exposed to from an<br />

eye-health perspective as part of a larger team.<br />

With three young children in tow (a girl and<br />

two boys aged 13, 10 and 8), however, Dr Khalid<br />

admits it was an important decision for him and<br />

his wife, but they are all now looking forward to<br />

the move. “You don’t go to small communities<br />

like this to just work, you have to want to be a<br />

part of the community.”<br />

Dr Khalid has locumed in Timaru a few times<br />

over the past year since his predecessor, Dr<br />

Mike Mair’s retirement in July 2015. When<br />

he mentioned to people at<br />

SCDHB that he thought it<br />

was a great place and was<br />

surprised they hadn’t found<br />

anyone to replace Mike, they<br />

asked him to come in and<br />

consider it.<br />

SCDHB chief<br />

executive Nigel Trainor,<br />

talking to the Timaru Herald,<br />

said having Dr Khalid meant<br />

cataract surgery could once<br />

again be performed at<br />

Timaru Hospital and private<br />

alternatives would now be<br />

Dr Muhammed Kahlid at RANZCO NZ<br />

available through the eye<br />

in Dunedin in May<br />

clinic.<br />

“The search for an ophthalmololgist has been<br />

extensive and during this time Dr Khalid was<br />

able to provide support to South Canterbury<br />

DHB as a locum doctor. We are delighted that<br />

he liked what he saw and has decided to make<br />

the move to Timaru permanent. He brings with<br />

him extensive global experience and will be a<br />

real asset to the community,” said Trainor.<br />

Originally from Pakistan, Dr Khalid also<br />

trained in Ireland and obtained his fellowship<br />

in ophthalmology from the Royal College<br />

of Surgeons of Edinburgh. He also has a<br />

postgraduate degree in medicine from the<br />

National University of Ireland in Galway<br />

and a diploma from the European Board of<br />

Ophthalmology. He moved to New Zealand with<br />

his family in 2013 to be nearer to family in this<br />

part of the world. ▀<br />

RANZCO launches referral<br />

guides; signs Specsavers MoU<br />

The Royal<br />

Australian<br />

and New<br />

Zealand College of<br />

Ophthalmologists<br />

(RANZCO) has<br />

released the first of<br />

a series of planned<br />

referral guides for<br />

optometrists and<br />

GPs to help provide<br />

more effective and<br />

efficient patient<br />

care pathways<br />

and improve eye<br />

health outcomes<br />

for patients across<br />

Australasia.<br />

The first of the<br />

referral guidelines,<br />

looking at glaucoma<br />

management, was<br />

released at the beginning of August. Guidelines<br />

on diabetic retinopathy and age-related macular<br />

degeneration (AMD) are expected to be released<br />

in the near future, with other indications to be<br />

released later, following feedback.<br />

In a statement RANZCO said these referral<br />

guidelines do not favour and are not dependent<br />

upon any one particular practice referral system<br />

or methodology. “They simply provide a resource<br />

which lays out a suggested referral pathway if<br />

certain signs and/or symptoms are identified.<br />

The aim is to ensure patients receive the best<br />

care possible, in the most appropriate timeframe<br />

and from the appropriate healthcare provider.”<br />

The referral guidelines are based on peerreviewed<br />

publications about best practice in<br />

relation to referrals for symptoms and disease<br />

areas. “That said, we recognise that what works<br />

best in theory is not always what works best<br />

in practice and so we will be assessing the<br />

effectiveness and usability of the guidelines,”<br />

said Dr Bradley Horsburgh, RANZCO president.<br />

“We are all part of the eye healthcare system<br />

and it’s important that we deliver that as<br />

smoothly and effectively as possible for<br />

patients.”<br />

Dr David Andrews (RANZCO), Peter Larsen (Specsavers), Dr Bradley Horsburgh (RANZCO), Charles Hornor<br />

(Specsavers) and Dr Russell Bach (RANZCO) celebrate the agreement between RANZCO and Specsavers<br />

MoU with Specsavers<br />

Though RANZCO stressed it is seeking feedback<br />

from all optometrists, ophthalmologists and GPs<br />

who use the new referral guidelines, to ensure<br />

it gathers information quickly it has agreed<br />

a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU), or<br />

statement of intent, with Specsavers Australia<br />

and New Zealand to run a two-year pilot<br />

programme to gather metrics and data. “Given<br />

the number of Specsavers optometric practices,<br />

this pilot will allow us to efficiently gather data<br />

to assess the effectiveness of the guidelines,” said<br />

RANZCO.<br />

“Working with Specsavers does not limit<br />

the availability of the referral guidelines. The<br />

guidelines will be promoted and made widely<br />

available to all optometrists and GPs across<br />

Australia and New Zealand.”<br />

In a joint statement RANZCO and Specsavers<br />

said both parties will share resultant data with<br />

healthcare funding and management bodies<br />

to shed greater light on eye health and broader<br />

healthcare outputs.<br />

“With a growing and ageing population in<br />

both Australia and New Zealand we have a duty<br />

to ensure that there is ingrained collaboration<br />

between optometry and ophthalmology,” said<br />

Peter Larsen, Specsavers’ optometry director.<br />

“It is not enough to say we work together, we<br />

actually need to set ourselves specific areas of<br />

collaboration and measure the effectiveness<br />

and efficiency of that collaboration. This<br />

arrangement between Specsavers and RANZCO<br />

does just that, the goal being superior patient<br />

outcomes.”<br />

Larsen said the first discussions with RANZCO<br />

about using Specsavers’ ANZ network of<br />

optometrists to proactively review the guidelines<br />

took place in March. “And a meeting of minds<br />

quickly emerged, leading to this MoU.”<br />

RANZCO will be running training sessions on<br />

the guidelines at the <strong>2016</strong> RANZCO Congress<br />

in Melbourne in November for all optometrists<br />

and GPs who wish to attend, while Specsavers<br />

will be releasing more details about the MoU<br />

and what it means in practice for Specsavers’<br />

optometrists at its <strong>2016</strong> Clinical Conference in<br />

Brisbane this month.<br />

To download and review the first RANZCO<br />

Referral Pathway for Glaucoma Management go<br />

to: https://ranzco.edu/ophthalmology-and-eyehealth/collaborative-care/referral-pathway-forglaucoma-management<br />

▀<br />

How Pharmac makes funding decidions<br />

Clinical advice from experts is the bedrock of Pharmac’s medicines assessments,<br />

writes Medical Director Dr John Wyeth<br />

Advice from clinical experts is an important<br />

part of the Pharmac funding process.<br />

There are multiple ways in which health<br />

professionals provide input to our funding<br />

decisions. From trained medical professionals on<br />

Pharmac’s staff to experts on our specialist panels,<br />

and members of our clinical advisory committees<br />

and wider consultation, input from the medical<br />

profession is central to Pharmac’s decisions on<br />

medicine funding.<br />

Our main clinical committee is the Pharmacology<br />

and Therapeutics Advisory Committee (PTAC),<br />

which has 21 subcommittees in clinical<br />

specialities like cardiovascular disease, diabetes<br />

and ophthalmology. The key skills of our clinical<br />

committee members are reviewing and advising us<br />

on the evidence for the use of medicines in a New<br />

Zealand clinical setting.<br />

We’re sometimes asked why we need to seek<br />

advice on the evidence around medicines,<br />

when a lot of this work is already undertaken<br />

internationally. The answer is that we need to<br />

clearly understand the way a new medicine might<br />

be used in New Zealand. What are the currently<br />

favoured treatments in New Zealand that we<br />

are comparing the medicine under assessment<br />

with? We need to know we are using the right<br />

comparator in our assessment. Our advisory<br />

committee members can help answer this<br />

question, and they are also expected to use their<br />

clinical networks and experience to provide advice<br />

to Pharmac on all aspects of a medicine under<br />

consideration.<br />

All together, Pharmac has around 140 expert<br />

doctors and other health professionals providing<br />

formal advice on medicine funding applications – a<br />

considerable resource.<br />

Because New Zealand has a medicine funding<br />

environment with a defined budget, we can’t<br />

afford every medicine that is available on the<br />

market, so choices have to be made. We know<br />

there are high public expectations around<br />

accessing the ‘latest and greatest’ medicines, but<br />

we know in practice that these high expectations<br />

around effectiveness of new medicines don’t<br />

always play out. We need to carefully examine<br />

the evidence and take a dispassionate view of<br />

the medicines being looked at. We can’t spend<br />

the same dollar twice, so we need to make sure<br />

the choice we make is the one that gets the best<br />

health outcomes for New Zealanders.<br />

The main pathway to medicine funding is<br />

through the Pharmaceutical Schedule. This<br />

is the list of medicines funded for all eligible<br />

patients. A medicine considered for Schedule<br />

listing goes through a rigorous process<br />

involving the assessment of clinical evidence,<br />

pharmacoeconomic evaluation by Pharmac’s team<br />

of health economists and negotiation with the<br />

company that supplies the medicine. If we get<br />

to the point of a provisional agreement with a<br />

company, we then consult with the wider public.<br />

What we want to know is what benefit any new<br />

medicine has over and above the medicines that<br />

are already funded on the Schedule – and what<br />

will the additional cost of that benefit be?<br />

Pharmac’s commercial skills can provide benefits<br />

also. We’re hoping that’s the case with a process<br />

we’re currently running, which emerged from<br />

recommendations made by PTAC. Two anti-VEGF<br />

agents are currently listed for use in DHB hospitals<br />

for wet macular degeneration – bevacizumab<br />

(Avastin) and ranibizumab (Lucentis). In reviewing<br />

an application for another agent aflibercept, PTAC<br />

recommended Pharmac run a commercial process<br />

that might<br />

lead to further<br />

agents being<br />

listed. That<br />

process is now<br />

underway.<br />

Sometimes<br />

people have<br />

unusual clinical<br />

circumstances<br />

that might<br />

mean a funded<br />

medicine isn’t<br />

right for them,<br />

and there is<br />

Dr John Wyeth<br />

an unfunded<br />

medicine that<br />

is. Pharmac also has a process for assessing<br />

individual patient applications for unfunded<br />

medicines – the Named Patient Pharmaceutical<br />

Assessment (NPPA) process. Pharmac receives<br />

nearly 2000 applications a year under NPPA, most<br />

of which are approved. NPPA isn’t a mechanism<br />

to provide access to every unfunded medicine –<br />

it aims to fill a specific need for some patients<br />

whose clinical circumstances aren’t served by<br />

medicines listed on the Schedule.<br />

We encourage health professionals to get<br />

involved in Pharmac funding processes and<br />

have links with associations and societies. But<br />

any clinician can be part of our consultation<br />

database. We’d be happy to add you if you email<br />

consultation@pharmac.govt.nz ▀<br />

6 NEW ZEALAND OPTICS <strong>Sep</strong>tember <strong>2016</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!