15.12.2012 Views

Annual Report 2009 Royal BAM Group nv

Annual Report 2009 Royal BAM Group nv

Annual Report 2009 Royal BAM Group nv

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

58<br />

<strong>2009</strong><br />

proceedings and of AGIV’s bankruptcy is expected to<br />

take several years. Based on current information, the<br />

<strong>Group</strong> believes that there will be no substantial negative<br />

financial consequences in the future.<br />

In 2005, during the construction of a bored tunnel for<br />

the SMART North Tunnel in Kuala Lumpur, Wayss &<br />

Freytag Ingenieurbau was confronted by ground<br />

conditions at variance with the information supplied by<br />

the client. Wayss & Freytag terminated the contract at<br />

the start of 2006 as a result of the client’s failure to fulfil<br />

its payment obligations and refusal to deal with Wayss<br />

& Freytag’s claims for an extension of the construction<br />

period and reimbursement of costs. The client in turn<br />

also terminated the contract in January 2006. Wayss &<br />

Freytag lodged a claim against the client for more than<br />

€20 million as compensation for costs incurred. The<br />

client lodged provisional counterclaims amounting to<br />

€5 million. The independent dispute adjudicator, in the<br />

contractually prescribed procedure, has now held that<br />

Wayss & Freytag was entitled to terminate the contract.<br />

The proceedings are ongoing. Based on the present<br />

state of knowledge, the <strong>Group</strong> considers that the<br />

provision that has been made is adequate.<br />

Two of the <strong>Group</strong>’s operating companies, partly in<br />

combination with third parties, are claiming payment<br />

from the client, the State of the Netherlands, of i<strong>nv</strong>oices<br />

for insulating homes around Schiphol Airport. A dispute<br />

has arisen between the construction companies and the<br />

client in relation to the final settlement in the amount of<br />

more than €10 million. The construction companies are<br />

also claiming compensation for loss sustained as a<br />

consequence of reduced construction volume and<br />

increased construction site costs due to disruption of<br />

the construction process. The State is making a<br />

counterclaim of approximately the same amount. The<br />

dispute regarding the final settlement is in arbitration.<br />

The <strong>Group</strong> is assuming, as matters currently stand, that<br />

no substantial adverse financial consequences will<br />

result from these legal proceedings.<br />

On 3 March <strong>2009</strong>, during construction work on part of<br />

the metro system in Cologne, several adjacent buildings<br />

– including Cologne’s municipal archives building –<br />

collapsed. Two residents were killed. Wayss & Freytag<br />

Ingenieurbau is a one-third partner in the consortium<br />

carrying out this project but was not directly i<strong>nv</strong>olved in<br />

the work being done at the site of the accident.<br />

The customer has instituted a judicial inquiry (known as<br />

a Beweisverfahren) before the district court (the<br />

Landgericht in Cologne). As part of these proceedings, a<br />

number of specialists are i<strong>nv</strong>estigating the cause of the<br />

accident. Their i<strong>nv</strong>estigation is not expected to be<br />

complete before the end of 2010. Only once their<br />

i<strong>nv</strong>estigation is complete will it be possible to<br />

determine whether the consortium is in any way<br />

responsible for the accident. The German Public<br />

Prosecution Service is also carrying out its own<br />

i<strong>nv</strong>estigation to determine whether any criminal<br />

offences may have been committed.<br />

The damage to property is considerable and the parties<br />

i<strong>nv</strong>olved have claimed under several different insurance<br />

policies. The <strong>Group</strong> is assuming, as matters currently<br />

stand, that no substantial adverse financial<br />

consequences for the <strong>Group</strong> will result from this event.<br />

In 2002, the European Commission commenced an<br />

i<strong>nv</strong>estigation into possible competition-law<br />

infringements in connection with the market conduct<br />

of several firms in the bitumen sector, both on the<br />

production side and on the procurement side. One of<br />

the company’s operating companies is i<strong>nv</strong>olved in this<br />

i<strong>nv</strong>estigation, as a purchaser of bitumen. In September<br />

2006, the European Commission confirmed<br />

infringements of competition law and imposed fines on<br />

the companies i<strong>nv</strong>olved.<br />

The fine pertaining to the <strong>Group</strong> operating company<br />

concerned amounts to €20.7 million and is fully covered<br />

by provision. An appeal has been lodged against the<br />

imposition of this fine.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!