15.12.2012 Views

aperçu des réponses au questionnaire accompagnant la ... - HCCH

aperçu des réponses au questionnaire accompagnant la ... - HCCH

aperçu des réponses au questionnaire accompagnant la ... - HCCH

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Question Réponse / Reply État / State<br />

6.2. Develop. re “in<br />

civil or commercial<br />

matters”?<br />

[F] Oui, <strong>la</strong> Convention a récemment fait l'objet de jurisprudence pour <strong>la</strong> première fois <strong>au</strong> Québec.<br />

[E] Yes, the Convention has recently been the subject of judicial decisions for the first time in Quebec.<br />

Since 1992 there has been a significant increase in requests for service of non-judicial documents, the<br />

litigation character of which appears to be questionable. However, the Irish Central Authority has not yet declined to<br />

serve on the basis of the doubts aforesaid.<br />

No / Non<br />

Portugal : No. Our Courts tend to follow the interpretation of the European Court of Justice on the concept of civil<br />

and commercial matters under the Convention of 27 September 1968 on Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of<br />

Judgements in Civil and Commercial Matters (“Brussels Convention”).<br />

[…] In the legal system of the MSAR, the difficulties that arise in other countries do not exist, as the only matters<br />

that are excluded from the phrase “civil and commercial matters” are administrative matters.<br />

Some States do not execute requests in cases, which they define as administrative and not included in “civil and<br />

commercial matters”.<br />

The phrase "in civil or commercial matters" may give rise to some difficulties in interpretation of its scope bec<strong>au</strong>se<br />

the interpretation of the phrase may differ between a requesting State and a requested State. A typical<br />

example of this divergence can be seen in the question whether or not the documents of administrative cases<br />

should be within its scope of the phrase. We understand that each State shall have <strong>au</strong>thority to interpret it<br />

<strong>au</strong>tonomously. However it is necessary and beneficial to know the interpretation of the phrase and the practical<br />

operation in each State. Where the interpretation of such phrase becomes a point of issue in the civil case in Japan,<br />

a court seized interprets it <strong>au</strong>tonomously.<br />

L’expression “en matière civile et commerciale” utilisée par ce bure<strong>au</strong> indique <strong>la</strong> notification de tous les actes, à<br />

l’exclusion <strong>des</strong> actes en matière pénale et administrative.<br />

The Spanish Central Authority adopts a fairly broad approach to this concept, and is ready to accept requests for<br />

service of documents under the Service Convention that re<strong>la</strong>te to almost anything except criminal offences. In<br />

this respect, service has been granted for judicial documents pertaining to the <strong>la</strong>bour and administrative branch<br />

of our jurisdiction.<br />

We have encountered one particu<strong>la</strong>r problem with the scope in re<strong>la</strong>tion to one country´s <strong>au</strong>thorities (France) who<br />

tried to serve documents in administrative matters (orders for fines) on the basis of the Convention. Even in this<br />

case, we do not think this was a problem with the interpretation of the scope, but rather finding a way to serve<br />

documents in situations where there is no other international instrument. Slovak courts do not seem to have<br />

difficulties with the scope “civil and commercial” matters and it has always been interpreted widely (including<br />

family <strong>la</strong>w, succession, <strong>la</strong>bour <strong>la</strong>w matters as well). The only area of “uneasiness” are cases of presumably<br />

administrative <strong>la</strong>w decided by foreign (administrative) courts (we had cases with Germany), where sometimes for<br />

us as a requested country is difficult to assess whether the case does or does not fall under the scope. But even in<br />

such margin cases we provide the requested assistance, though we advise the Slovak courts that they cannot<br />

Suisse, Ukraine<br />

Canada (Québec)<br />

Ir<strong>la</strong>nde<br />

Bé<strong>la</strong>rus, Bulgarie<br />

(depuis 2000), Canada,<br />

Chine, Chine<br />

(Hongkong),<br />

Danemark, Etats-Unis,<br />

France, Fin<strong>la</strong>nde,<br />

Ir<strong>la</strong>nde, Luxembourg<br />

(absence de jurispr.),<br />

Norvège, Pays-Bas,<br />

Portugal, Suisse,<br />

Ukraine<br />

Chine (Macao)<br />

Suède<br />

Japon<br />

Italie<br />

Espagne<br />

Rép. Slovaque<br />

Page 10 of 69

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!