15.12.2012 Views

Why Read This Book? - Index of

Why Read This Book? - Index of

Why Read This Book? - Index of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3.4 The Principle <strong>of</strong> Mathematical Induction 81<br />

define T = N − S = N ∩ S C , then T ⊆ N and n ∈ T . Thus T is a non-empty subset<br />

<strong>of</strong> the positive integers, which, by the WOP, contains a smallest element a. Now it<br />

is impossible that a = 1 because 1 ∈ S. Thus a>1, so that a − 1 ∈ N. Furthermore,<br />

since a is the smallest element <strong>of</strong> T , it must be that a − 1 /∈ T . Thus a − 1 ∈ S. But<br />

by I 2, since a − 1 ∈ S, it follows that a − 1 + 1 = a ∈ S. But if a ∈ S, then a/∈ T .<br />

<strong>This</strong> is a contradiction. Thus there is no smallest element <strong>of</strong> T , which means that<br />

T is empty. Therefore, N ⊆ S, whence S = N.<br />

What doesTheorem 3.4.6 have to do with proving the claims in Examples 3.4.1–<br />

3.4.5? Think <strong>of</strong> these examples as statements about the positive integers. They<br />

say effectively that a certain formula or statement is true for all n ≥ 1. To be as<br />

general as possible, address such a statement by P(n). Let’s define S to be the<br />

set <strong>of</strong> all positive integers n for which the statement P(n) is true. The trick is to<br />

show that S has properties I 1–I 2. Then the PMI will allow us to conclude that<br />

S = N, which is the same as saying P(n) is true for all n. First we show that 1 ∈ S by<br />

showing P(1) is true. <strong>This</strong> is called establishing the base case. Then we show that<br />

n ∈ S ⇒ n + 1 ∈ S by supposing P(n) is true, and using this to show that P(n + 1)<br />

is true. The assumption that n ∈ S is called the inductive assumption, and the part<br />

<strong>of</strong> the pro<strong>of</strong> where we show that n ∈ S implies n + 1 ∈ S is called the inductive<br />

step. Having shown that S has properties I 1–I 2, we then conclude S = N; that is,<br />

P(n) holds true for all n. Here is a sample theorem.<br />

Theorem 3.4.7 (Sample). For all positive integers n, P(n).<br />

Pro<strong>of</strong>. We prove by induction on n ≥ 1.<br />

(I 1) P(1).<br />

(I 2) Suppose n ≥ 1 and P(n). Then .... Thus P(n + 1).<br />

Therefore, by induction, P(n) is true for all n ≥ 1.<br />

There will be some point in step I 2 where you use the inductive assumption<br />

P(n) to get over the hump <strong>of</strong> showing P(n + 1). In the pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> the next theorem,<br />

we rewrite a sum in the following way:<br />

�n+1<br />

�<br />

�n<br />

ak = (a1 + a2 +···+an) + an+1 =<br />

k=1<br />

Theorem 3.4.8 For all n ≥ 1,<br />

n�<br />

k 2 =<br />

k=1<br />

Pro<strong>of</strong>. We prove by induction on n ≥ 1.<br />

n(n + 1)(2n + 1)<br />

6<br />

k=1<br />

ak<br />

�<br />

+ an+1<br />

(3.37)<br />

(3.38)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!