15.12.2012 Views

Why Read This Book? - Index of

Why Read This Book? - Index of

Why Read This Book? - Index of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

158 Chapter 4 Functions<br />

By Eq. (4.26), it follows that the entries in row n are C(n, k), where the diagonal<br />

column <strong>of</strong> 1s headed downward left and downward right correspond to k = 0<br />

and k = n, respectively.<br />

Here’s an important place where the entries in Pascal’s triangle appear. Suppose<br />

you want to expand the expression (a + b) n for some nonnegative integer n.<br />

Rather than multiply out (a + b)(a + b) ···(a + b) using the extended distributive<br />

property, there is a much easier way to see what the terms are, and it involves<br />

C(n, k) in the coefficients.<br />

Theorem 4.10.2 (Binomial Theorem). Let a and b be nonzero real numbers,<br />

and let n be a nonnegative integer. Then<br />

(a + b) n =<br />

=<br />

� �<br />

n<br />

a<br />

0<br />

n b 0 +<br />

n�<br />

k=0<br />

� �<br />

n<br />

a<br />

k<br />

n−k b k =<br />

� �<br />

n<br />

a<br />

1<br />

n−1 b 1 +<br />

n�<br />

k=0<br />

� �<br />

n<br />

a<br />

2<br />

2 b 2 +···+<br />

� �<br />

n<br />

a<br />

n − k<br />

n−k b k<br />

� �<br />

n<br />

a<br />

n<br />

0 b n<br />

(4.32)<br />

The only reason we do not allow a or b to be zero in Theorem 4.10.2 is that<br />

0 0 is not defined, so Eq. (4.32) would produce some undefined terms. If either a<br />

or b is zero, the expansion <strong>of</strong> (a + b) n is not particularly interesting. Thus we omit<br />

it. Using the entries from Pascal’s triangle, we have<br />

(a + b) 0 = 1a 0 b 0 = 1<br />

(a + b) 1 = 1a 1 b 0 + 1a 0 b 1 = a + b<br />

(a + b) 2 = a 2 + 2ab + b 2<br />

(a + b) 3 = a 3 + 3a 2 b + 3ab 2 + b 3 , etc.<br />

(4.33)<br />

We can argue the binomial theorem in several ways using combinatorial style<br />

arguments that appeal to some <strong>of</strong> our previous counting techniques. One way is to<br />

note that applying the extended distributive property to (a + b)(a + b) ···(a + b)<br />

is tantamount to creating a whole bunch <strong>of</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> a form like aaabbaab, where<br />

from each (a + b) factor we select either a or b. Since each factor allows for two<br />

possible choices, there are 2 n terms generated, and every one is <strong>of</strong> the form a n−k b k<br />

for some 0 ≤ k ≤ n. To determine the coefficient <strong>of</strong> a n−k b k , we must determine how<br />

many times the term a n−k b k appears in all the distribution <strong>of</strong> the multiplication.<br />

If k <strong>of</strong> the factors supply us with b and the remaining factors provide us with a,<br />

then the number <strong>of</strong> times a n−k b k appears in the grand sum is the same as the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> ways <strong>of</strong> choosing k <strong>of</strong> the n terms to provide us with b (or n − k <strong>of</strong> the<br />

terms to provide us with a). That is, the term a n−k b k is produced C(n, k) times in<br />

the distribution.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!