15.12.2012 Views

Why Read This Book? - Index of

Why Read This Book? - Index of

Why Read This Book? - Index of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

174 Chapter 5 The Real Numbers<br />

EXERCISE 5.3.11 Let F ={A} be a family <strong>of</strong> closed sets, and let {Bk} n k=1 be a<br />

finite family <strong>of</strong> closed sets. Then<br />

(a) �<br />

F A is closed.14<br />

(b) � n k=1 Bk is closed.<br />

By Exercises 5.3.9 and 5.3.11, it follows that any finite set is closed because it<br />

is a finite union <strong>of</strong> singleton sets. The integers are a good example <strong>of</strong> an infinite<br />

set that is closed, because Z C =∪n∈Z(n, n + 1).<br />

EXERCISE 5.3.12 Give an example <strong>of</strong> an infinite family F <strong>of</strong> closed sets such<br />

that ∪F A is not closed. Prove. 15<br />

EXERCISE 5.3.13 Show that {1/n} ∞ n=1 is not closed by showing its complement<br />

is not open.<br />

Lots <strong>of</strong> sets are neither open nor closed. For example, [a, b) is sometimes called<br />

a half-open or half-closed interval. Believe it or not, some sets are both open and<br />

closed. The empty set and the real numbers are both open and closed because<br />

they are both open and they are complementary. Theorem 5.3.14 uses the LUB<br />

axiom to show the important fact that these are the only two sets <strong>of</strong> real numbers<br />

that are both open and closed. The pro<strong>of</strong> is a little intricate, so we provide it here.<br />

It is important for you to work your way through the details because it illustrates<br />

an important type <strong>of</strong> pro<strong>of</strong> where we show that certain examples <strong>of</strong> something are<br />

the only ones that exist. Keep a pencil and paper handy to sketch some number<br />

lines and help you visualize the details.<br />

Theorem 5.3.14 The empty set and the real numbers are the only subsets <strong>of</strong><br />

the real numbers that are both open and closed.<br />

Pro<strong>of</strong>. We prove by contradiction. Suppose there exists a non-empty proper subset<br />

A <strong>of</strong> the real numbers that is both open and closed. Then A and A C are both<br />

open and non-empty. Pick any a1 ∈ A and a2 ∈ A C . Without any loss <strong>of</strong> generality,<br />

we may assume a1 0 : Nɛ(a1) ⊆ A}; that is, E is the set <strong>of</strong> all<br />

ɛ>0 such that the ɛ-neighborhood <strong>of</strong> a1 is contained entirely within A. Since A<br />

is open, E is non-empty. Because a2 ∈ A C , E is bounded from above by a2 − a1.<br />

Thus we may apply the LUB property to E to conclude the existence <strong>of</strong> some ɛ0,<br />

the LUB <strong>of</strong> E. Thus Nɛ0 (a1) is the largest neighborhood <strong>of</strong> a1 that is contained<br />

entirely within A.<br />

In order to arrive at a contradiction, we look at the end points <strong>of</strong> the interval<br />

(a1 − ɛ0,a1 + ɛ0). First we ask if it is possible that a1 + ɛ0 ∈ A C . If so, then the fact<br />

14 See Exercise 3.3.8.<br />

15 You shouldn’t have to look too far.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!