15.12.2012 Views

Why Read This Book? - Index of

Why Read This Book? - Index of

Why Read This Book? - Index of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

EXERCISE 3.10.2 √ 2 is irrational. 33,34,35,36,37<br />

3.11 Relations in General 111<br />

A few words are in order about irrational numbers. Let’s work backwards from<br />

Exercise 3.10.2. Exercise 3.10.2 says √ 2 is not rational, while Theorem 3.9.1 says<br />

√ 2 is real. Thus there do, in fact, exist real numbers that are irrational. But<br />

Theorem 3.9.1 is based on assumption A22, which we have said very little about.<br />

As we said, assumption A22 is not an axiom <strong>of</strong> the real numbers. It can be proved<br />

from the Least Upper Bound axiom, which is a standard axiom <strong>of</strong> the real numbers.<br />

So what we discover is that the irrational numbers owe their existence to the Least<br />

Upper Bound axiom.<br />

EXERCISE 3.10.3 The pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> Exercise 3.10.2 can be easily generalized to<br />

demonstrate that √ p is irrational for any prime number p. Explain how your<br />

pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> Exercise 3.10.2 can be adapted into a pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> this more general claim. 38<br />

EXERCISE 3.10.4 The sum <strong>of</strong> a rational and an irrational is irrational. 39<br />

EXERCISE 3.10.5 The product <strong>of</strong> a nonzero rational and an irrational is<br />

irrational.<br />

EXERCISE 3.10.6 Let a, b, c, and d be rational numbers, and suppose a + b √ 2 =<br />

c + d √ 2. Does it follow that a = c and b = d? 40<br />

3.11 Relations in General<br />

Equivalence relations are just one example <strong>of</strong> the more general mathematical<br />

idea <strong>of</strong> a relation. A relation is a set construction that puts all kinds <strong>of</strong> element<br />

comparisons such as equality, less than, divisibility, and subset inclusion<br />

into one mathematical idea. It is also a way <strong>of</strong> linking elements <strong>of</strong> two different<br />

sets together, and it is a context in which functions can be defined. In this section,<br />

we define a relation and look at examples and special kinds <strong>of</strong> relations. But first,<br />

we define the Cartesian product <strong>of</strong> two sets A and B by<br />

A × B ={(a, b) : a ∈ A, b ∈ B} (3.64)<br />

33 Naturally, you will want to assume √ 2 is rational and arrive at a contradiction.<br />

34 Write √ 2 = m/n, where you can assume no common factors between m and n.<br />

35 Square both sides and look at the contrapositive <strong>of</strong> Corollary 2.4.5 .<br />

36 If m 2 is even then, ....What does this mean? Cancel out a 2.<br />

37 So n 2 is even. What contradiction does this cause?<br />

38 Corollary 2.5.12 might help.<br />

39 See Exercise 1.2.18(i).<br />

40 If b �= d, then what must be true <strong>of</strong> √ 2?

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!