hta_ knee intro.qxp - Ministero della Salute
hta_ knee intro.qxp - Ministero della Salute
hta_ knee intro.qxp - Ministero della Salute
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Executive summary<br />
One-liner<br />
Decision makers should privilege, in their activities, the use of the more cost-effective prosthesis<br />
models, linking purchase price with effectiveness estimates.<br />
Background<br />
Total <strong>knee</strong> replacement (TKR) is known as an effective procedure for patients with osteoarthritis<br />
(OA). The wide array of prosthesis models on the market makes the issuing of evidencebased<br />
guidance on choice, a priority for the equitable and transparent use of resources in any<br />
health system.<br />
The assessment of the clinical value of each model, from the viewpoint of a national health<br />
system, requires data on:<br />
i) which models are used in practice;<br />
ii) acceptable estimates of performance for those models;<br />
iii) their price.<br />
Aim<br />
We aimed to identify the TKR prostheses currently used in Italy, to retrieve evidence of performance<br />
for all the models identified from clinical studies and arthroplasty registers, and to construct<br />
a cost-effectiveness model to support the choice for healthcare payers.<br />
Methods<br />
We first performed a context-specific analysis to identify which prosthesis models are currently<br />
in use and their purchase prices. We involved 172 public hospitals and private accredited providers<br />
of the Italian national health service.<br />
Then we carried out a systematic review of evidence from clinical studies and an analysis of<br />
implant performance from arthroplasty registers. We were interested in recipients aged 50 and<br />
above that had received primary TKR and had been followed for at least 5 years.<br />
Finally, with the purchase prices and the effectiveness estimates identified, we carried out an<br />
economic evaluation to compare the different models.<br />
XI