- Page 1 and 2:
HTA REPORT Prostheses for primary t
- Page 3 and 4:
Contributions Authors Marina Cerbo,
- Page 5 and 6:
HTA REPORT Prostheses for primary t
- Page 7 and 8:
10. Recommendations . . . . . . . .
- Page 9:
Prefazione Quest’anno l’Agenas
- Page 12 and 13:
XII Results Literature in this fiel
- Page 14 and 15:
XIV Obiettivi del report L’interv
- Page 16 and 17:
XVI formati e delle variabili racco
- Page 18 and 19:
2 The procedures were identified ac
- Page 21 and 22:
2. Technology, procedure and altern
- Page 23:
3. The marketing status of knee pro
- Page 27 and 28:
5. Context-specific analysis Contex
- Page 29 and 30:
Figure 5.1: Type of centres in the
- Page 31 and 32:
Figure 5.2: Percentage of respondin
- Page 33 and 34:
Table 5.3: Volume of purchased pros
- Page 35 and 36:
5.2.5 Analysis on purchasing price
- Page 37:
Table 5.6: Distribution of mean wei
- Page 40 and 41:
24 6.1.3 Evidence synthesis After t
- Page 42 and 43:
26 Survival rate as “revision for
- Page 44:
28 Table 6.1: Evidence table for si
- Page 49 and 50:
7. Assessing the evidence from arth
- Page 51 and 52:
Only four reports out of the 9 repo
- Page 53 and 54:
Table 7.3: Variables used in each r
- Page 55 and 56:
Table 7.4: Replies from the key-per
- Page 57 and 58:
Table 7.6: Data from the Australian
- Page 59 and 60:
Table 7.8: Data from Registro dell
- Page 61 and 62:
Table 7.11: Data from the Australia
- Page 63 and 64:
Table 7.15: Data from Registro dell
- Page 65:
Table 7.18: Revision rates of uncem
- Page 68 and 69:
52 We calculated ICERs only for cla
- Page 70 and 71:
54 Figure 8.1 shows prostheses ICER
- Page 72 and 73:
56 Table 8.3: ICER (AOAJRR data) fo
- Page 74 and 75:
58 8.4 Conclusions Regardless of wh
- Page 76 and 77:
60 The gross heterogeneity of repor
- Page 79:
10. Recommendations We recommend th
- Page 83:
12. Competing interests declaration
- Page 86 and 87:
70 22. http://www.agenas.it/monitor
- Page 88 and 89:
72 • a tibial component: a metall
- Page 90 and 91:
74 Retention or sacrifice of the po
- Page 92 and 93: 76 Figure A1.2: Examples of femoral
- Page 94 and 95: 78 Suggested readings Bronzino JD.
- Page 97 and 98: Appendix 2 Survey of Medical device
- Page 103 and 104: Appendix 3 Sampling methodology The
- Page 105: Table A2.2: Sample and total centre
- Page 108 and 109: 92 Veneto: 050017 Ospedale Sacro Cu
- Page 110 and 111: 94 Basilicata: 170011 Presidio Ospe
- Page 113 and 114: Appendix 6 Search strategy The sear
- Page 115 and 116: #50. (hls AND noetos) AND tornier A
- Page 117 and 118: #108. (prime) AND (exatech) AND pri
- Page 119 and 120: #166. (vanguard AND ps) AND ('biome
- Page 121 and 122: Select 6 document(s) Search ("1998-
- Page 123 and 124: Search ("1998-01-01"[Publication Da
- Page 125 and 126: Appendix 7 Data extraction form for
- Page 127 and 128: Common characteristics: Manufacture
- Page 129 and 130: Conclusions: Assessment of generali
- Page 131 and 132: Appendix 8 Data extraction form for
- Page 133 and 134: Appendix 9 Quality assessment tool
- Page 135 and 136: Appendix 10 List of excluded studie
- Page 137 and 138: Studies excluded for short follow-u
- Page 139 and 140: Robinson RP. Five-year follow-up of
- Page 141: Regnér L, Carlsson L, Kärrholm J,
- Page 145 and 146: Acronyms and abbreviations Agenas A