hta_ knee intro.qxp - Ministero della Salute

More documents

Recommendations

Info

78 Suggested readings Bronzino JD. The Biomedical Engineering Handbook - 2nd ed. CRC press, 2000 http://orthopedics.about.com/ (date last accessed 4 th December 2008) http://www.totaljoints.info/ (date last accessed 4 th December 2008) Victor J. Which implant do I pick? A glossary of promises. Orthopedics. 2006 Sep;29(9):839-41. Jacobs WC, Clement DJ, Wymenga AB. Retention versus removal of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee replacement: a systematic literature review within the Cochrane framework. Acta Orthop. 2005 Dec;76(6):757-68. Pritchett JW. Patient preferences in knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004 Sep;86(7):979-82. Kuster MS, Stachowiak GW. Factors affecting polyethylene wear in total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2002 Feb;25(2 Suppl):s235-42. Silverton CD. Cemented and cementless fixation: results and techniques. Instr Course Lect. 2006;55:429-37. Australian National Joint Register. http://www.dmac.adelaide.edu.au/aoanjrr/index.jsp (date last accessed 23 January 2009). Canadian Joint Replacement Registry. http://secure.cihi.ca/cihiweb/dispPage.jsp?cw_page=services_cjrr_e (date last accessed 23 January 2009). Danish Knee Arthroplasty Register. http://www.dshk.org/DKR-frame.htm (date last accessed 23 January 2009). Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register http://www.knee.nko.se/english/online/thePages/index.php (date last accessed 23 January 2009). Meneghini RM, Hanssen AD. Cementless fixation in total knee arthroplasty: past, present, and future. J Knee Surg. 2008 Oct;21(4):307-14. Levine B, Sporer S, Della Valle CJ et al. Porous tantalum in reconstructive surgery of the knee: a review. J Knee Surg. 2007 Jul;20(3):185-94. Jacobs W, Clement DJ, Wymenga AAB. Retention versus sacrifice of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee replacement for treatment of osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD004803. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004803.pub2. Greenwald AS, Heim CS. Mobile-bearing knee systems: ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene wear and design issues. Instr Course Lect. 2005;54:195-205. McEwen, H.M.J., Barnett, P.I., Bell et al. The influence of design, materials and kinematics on the in vitro wear of total knee replacements. J. Biomech. 2005;38, 357–365.
Sharma, A., Komistek, R.D., Ranawat, C.S. et al. 2007. In vivo contact pressures in total knee arthroplasties. J. Arthroplasty 22 (3), 404–416. Grupp TM, Kaddick C, Schwiesau J, Maas A, Stulberg SD. Fixed and mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty--influence on wear generation, corresponding wear areas, knee kinematics and particle composition. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2009 Feb;24(2):210-7. Ministero del Lavoro della Salute e delle Politiche Sociali – Settore Salute. http://www.ministerosalute.it/dispositivi/paginainternasf.jsp?id=499&menu=repertorio (date last accessed 23 Jannuary 2009). Räsänen P, Paavolainen P, Sintonen H, et al. Effectiveness of hip or knee replacement surgery in terms of quality-adjusted life years and costs. Acta Orthop 2007;78(1):108–15. Cram P, Vaughan-Sarrazin MS, Wolf B, et al. A comparison of total hip and knee replacement in specialty and general hospitals. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007;89(8):1675–84. Richmond JC. Surgery for osteoarthritis of the knee. Med Clin North Am. 2009 Jan;93(1):213-22. Rankin EA, Bostrom M, Hozack W, et al. Gender-specific knee replacements: a technology overview. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2008;16:63–7. Daniel DD, Akeson WH, O’Connor JJ, eds. Knee ligaments: Structure, function, injury and repair. New York: Raven Press; 1990. Victor J, Bellemans J. Physiologic kinematics as a concept for better flexion in TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Nov;452:53-8. Hall J, Copp SN, Adelson WS, et al. Extensor mechanism function in single-radius vs multiradius femoral components for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23(2):216-9 Pinaroli A, Piedade SR, Servien E, Neyret P. Intraoperative fractures and ligament tears during total knee arthroplasty. A 1795 posterostabilized TKA continuous series. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009 May 6. 79
Page 1 and 2:
HTA REPORT Prostheses for primary t
Page 3 and 4:
Contributions Authors Marina Cerbo,
Page 5 and 6:
HTA REPORT Prostheses for primary t
Page 7 and 8:
10. Recommendations . . . . . . . .
Page 9:
Prefazione Quest’anno l’Agenas
Page 12 and 13:
XII Results Literature in this fiel
Page 14 and 15:
XIV Obiettivi del report L’interv
Page 16 and 17:
XVI formati e delle variabili racco
Page 18 and 19:
2 The procedures were identified ac
Page 21 and 22:
2. Technology, procedure and altern
Page 23:
3. The marketing status of knee pro
Page 27 and 28:
5. Context-specific analysis Contex
Page 29 and 30:
Figure 5.1: Type of centres in the
Page 31 and 32:
Figure 5.2: Percentage of respondin
Page 33 and 34:
Table 5.3: Volume of purchased pros
Page 35 and 36:
5.2.5 Analysis on purchasing price
Page 37:
Table 5.6: Distribution of mean wei
Page 40 and 41:
24 6.1.3 Evidence synthesis After t
Page 42 and 43:
26 Survival rate as “revision for
Page 44: 28 Table 6.1: Evidence table for si
Page 49 and 50: 7. Assessing the evidence from arth
Page 51 and 52: Only four reports out of the 9 repo
Page 53 and 54: Table 7.3: Variables used in each r
Page 55 and 56: Table 7.4: Replies from the key-per
Page 57 and 58: Table 7.6: Data from the Australian
Page 59 and 60: Table 7.8: Data from Registro dell
Page 61 and 62: Table 7.11: Data from the Australia
Page 63 and 64: Table 7.15: Data from Registro dell
Page 65: Table 7.18: Revision rates of uncem
Page 68 and 69: 52 We calculated ICERs only for cla
Page 70 and 71: 54 Figure 8.1 shows prostheses ICER
Page 72 and 73: 56 Table 8.3: ICER (AOAJRR data) fo
Page 74 and 75: 58 8.4 Conclusions Regardless of wh
Page 76 and 77: 60 The gross heterogeneity of repor
Page 79: 10. Recommendations We recommend th
Page 83: 12. Competing interests declaration
Page 86 and 87: 70 22. http://www.agenas.it/monitor
Page 88 and 89: 72 • a tibial component: a metall
Page 90 and 91: 74 Retention or sacrifice of the po
Page 92 and 93: 76 Figure A1.2: Examples of femoral
Page 97 and 98: Appendix 2 Survey of Medical device
Page 103 and 104: Appendix 3 Sampling methodology The
Page 105: Table A2.2: Sample and total centre
Page 108 and 109: 92 Veneto: 050017 Ospedale Sacro Cu
Page 110 and 111: 94 Basilicata: 170011 Presidio Ospe
Page 113 and 114: Appendix 6 Search strategy The sear
Page 115 and 116: #50. (hls AND noetos) AND tornier A
Page 117 and 118: #108. (prime) AND (exatech) AND pri
Page 119 and 120: #166. (vanguard AND ps) AND ('biome
Page 121 and 122: Select 6 document(s) Search ("1998-
Page 123 and 124: Search ("1998-01-01"[Publication Da
Page 125 and 126: Appendix 7 Data extraction form for
Page 127 and 128: Common characteristics: Manufacture
Page 129 and 130: Conclusions: Assessment of generali
Page 131 and 132: Appendix 8 Data extraction form for
Page 133 and 134: Appendix 9 Quality assessment tool
Page 135 and 136: Appendix 10 List of excluded studie
Page 137 and 138: Studies excluded for short follow-u
Page 139 and 140: Robinson RP. Five-year follow-up of
Page 141 and 142: Regnér L, Carlsson L, Kärrholm J,
Page 143 and 144: Appendix 11 List of included studie
Page 145 and 146:
Acronyms and abbreviations Agenas A
show all

hta_ knee intro.qxp - Ministero della Salute

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?