Hong Kong's International Financial Centre: Retrospect and Prospect
Hong Kong's International Financial Centre: Retrospect and Prospect
Hong Kong's International Financial Centre: Retrospect and Prospect
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
______________________________________________________________________________<br />
GFC 8 (2010) Rankings of Areas of Competitiveness<br />
Rank People Business Market Infrastructure General<br />
Environment Access Competitiveness<br />
1 London New York New York London London<br />
2 New York London London New York New York<br />
3 <strong>Hong</strong> Kong <strong>Hong</strong> Kong <strong>Hong</strong> Kong <strong>Hong</strong> Kong <strong>Hong</strong> Kong<br />
4 Singapore Singapore Singapore Singapore Singapore<br />
5 Tokyo Chicago Tokyo Tokyo Tokyo<br />
6 Shanghai Tokyo Shanghai Chicago Shanghai<br />
7 Chicago Shanghai Chicago Washington Chicago<br />
8 Zurich Zurich Zurich Zurich Zurich<br />
9 Geneva Sydney Seoul Boston Toronto<br />
10 Boston Geneva Toronto Geneva Sydney<br />
_________________________________________________________________________<br />
All things considered, the compilers of the GFC surveys conclude that over the past<br />
decade, <strong>and</strong> especially over the past two years, the reputational gap between London <strong>and</strong> New<br />
York, one the one h<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>Hong</strong> Kong, Singapore, <strong>and</strong> other Asian centres, on the other, has<br />
been diminishing rapidly. Within the region, <strong>Hong</strong> Kong <strong>and</strong> Singapore are today locked in their<br />
own competition for regional leadership, but Shanghai <strong>and</strong> Shenzhen enjoy rapidly improving<br />
reputations. Comparisons are worth examining in more depth in this changing regional context.<br />
<strong>Hong</strong> Kong <strong>and</strong> Singapore<br />
Although striking differences exist in the underlying political economies of <strong>Hong</strong> Kong<br />
<strong>and</strong> Singapore, they share many historical characteristics. Both entered the modern era as<br />
colonies of Great Britain, Singapore in 1819 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Hong</strong> Kong in 1842. The main legacies of<br />
relevance to both of their financial markets today are the British common law tradition <strong>and</strong> the<br />
English language. Luckily for both, the British <strong>and</strong> then the Americans built the foundation of<br />
the global economy as it has evolved since the nineteenth century upon those legal <strong>and</strong> linguistic<br />
building blocks. Chinese emigres seeking a better life for their families adapted well to those<br />
traditions <strong>and</strong>, without losing their own cultural heritage or personal networks, they built<br />
adaptable <strong>and</strong> successful societies.<br />
Breaking from Great Britain in 1959 <strong>and</strong> from the Federation of Malaysia in 1965,<br />
Singapore became an isl<strong>and</strong>-state dominated by overseas-Chinese. Of its current population of<br />
4.8 million, 75% claim Chinese roots. For its part, <strong>Hong</strong> Kong’s relative autonomy from China<br />
was guaranteed in 1997 upon the basis of a population now comprising 6.9 million, 95% of<br />
which is Chinese. By 2009, Singapore’s booming economy recorded a GDP of US$177 billion,<br />
or US$37,000 per capita, while <strong>Hong</strong> Kong exp<strong>and</strong>ed to US$210 billion, or US$30,000 per<br />
capita. Certainly in comparison with regional neighbours, two ‘economic miracles’ accounted<br />
31