20.08.2018 Views

Global Goals Yearbook 2018

The future of the United Nations is more uncertain than at any time before. Like his predecessors, UN Secretary General, Antonio Guterres, has promised to reform the United Nations. Drivers are two major agreements: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the Paris Climate Accord. Both stand for a move away from statal top-down multilateralism towards new form of partnership between the public and the private sector as well as the civil society. The Global Goals Yearbook, published under the auspices of the macondo foundation, therefore covers „Partnership for the Goals“ as its 2018 main topic. Our world is truly not sustainable at this time. To make the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development a success story, we need an enormous increase in effort. This cannot happen without help from the private sector. But businesses need a reason to contribute as well as attractive partnerships that are based on win-win constellations. We have no alternative but to rethink the role that public–private partnerships can play in this effort. That is why United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres is calling upon UN entities to strengthen and better align their private-sector engagement. In every change there is a new chance. The Global Goals Yearbook 2018 discusses the multiple aspects of how private sector engagement can be improved. Recommendations are, among others, to revise multilaterism, partnership models and processes and to invest more in trust, a failure culture as well as metrics and monitoring. When businesses engage in partnerships for the Goals, this is more than just signing checks. It means inserting the “do good” imperative of the SDGs into corporate culture, business cases, innovation cycles, investor relationships, and, of course, the daily management processes and (extra-)financial reporting. The Yearbook includes arguments from academic and business experts, the World Bank and the Club of Rome as well as UN entities, among them UNDP, UNSSC, UNOPS, UN JIU, and UN DESA.

The future of the United Nations is more uncertain than at any time before. Like his predecessors, UN Secretary General, Antonio Guterres, has promised to reform the United Nations. Drivers are two major agreements: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the Paris Climate Accord. Both stand for a move away from statal top-down multilateralism towards new form of partnership between the public and the private sector as well as the civil society. The Global Goals Yearbook, published under the auspices of the macondo foundation, therefore covers „Partnership for the Goals“ as its 2018 main topic.
Our world is truly not sustainable at this time. To make the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development a success story, we need an enormous increase in effort. This cannot happen without help from the private sector. But businesses need a reason to contribute as well as attractive partnerships that are based on win-win constellations.

We have no alternative but to rethink the role that public–private partnerships can play in this effort. That is why United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres is calling upon UN entities to strengthen and better align their private-sector engagement. In every change there is a new chance.

The Global Goals Yearbook 2018 discusses the multiple aspects of how private sector engagement can be improved. Recommendations are, among others, to revise multilaterism, partnership models and processes and to invest more in trust, a failure culture as well as metrics and monitoring.

When businesses engage in partnerships for the Goals, this is more than just signing checks. It means inserting the “do good” imperative of the SDGs into corporate culture, business cases, innovation cycles, investor relationships, and, of course, the daily management processes and (extra-)financial reporting.

The Yearbook includes arguments from academic and business experts, the World Bank and the Club of Rome as well as UN entities, among them UNDP, UNSSC, UNOPS, UN JIU, and UN DESA.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

REFINANCING PARTNERSHIPS<br />

Act<br />

Plan<br />

Check<br />

Do<br />

(end-of-pipe financing) that has the potential to shift our<br />

entire society in the right direction (Figure 1).<br />

Firstly, a parallel optional currency system would create new<br />

green jobs and allow people from the shadow economy to<br />

shift over into the green domain (inverse trafficking). Secondly,<br />

it would reduce negative externalities and downsize costs<br />

within the entropic sector and reduce damage costs (inverse<br />

pricing). Thirdly, it would reduce the pro-cyclical tendencies<br />

of the monetary monoculture in money creation, the interbanking<br />

sector, credit lines, and real investments (anti-cyclical).<br />

Furthermore, it would stimulate qualitative growth pathways,<br />

incorporating new renewable technologies and generating<br />

positive externalities by using different channels.<br />

4. A parallel currency system is Pareto superior<br />

Why does such a parallel optional currency system have the<br />

potential to increase wealth, resilience, and efficiency at the<br />

same time, making the overall economic operating system<br />

Pareto superior? The real tragedy of the commons we are<br />

dealing with here is not that the commons are not exclusive,<br />

but that they are operating within a monetary system that<br />

prevents them from unleashing their full potential for the<br />

good of humankind. Empirical research shows consistently that<br />

the return on investment (ROI) on (global) common goods for<br />

society as a whole is a stunning 10 to 100 times higher than<br />

the yields achieved through private business models or state<br />

bonds. The following table illustrates the yields for private<br />

business models and state bonds over a century:<br />

This parallel optional currency mechanism, including blockchain<br />

technology and an Ethereum protocol, would provide<br />

targeted, programmable, identifiable, and recordable financial<br />

Figure 2<br />

S&P 500 3-M T-bill 10-Y T-bill<br />

1928–2015 11 % 3 % 5 %<br />

1966–2015 11 % 5 % 7 %<br />

2006–2015 9 % 1 % 5 %<br />

Source: Standard and Poor’s 500 index;<br />

3-month treasury bill; 10-year treasury bill<br />

transactions and earmarked, dedicated funds, thereby avoiding<br />

fraud and corruption. The ID blockchain would ensure<br />

that the additional liquidity is spent only on SDGs from the<br />

outset. This would create a new parallel marketplace for the 75<br />

percent of the world’s population who have not been benefiting<br />

from the existing operating model. The new mechanism<br />

would eventually become intertwined with the traditional<br />

sector. From central banks to governments, local state authorities,<br />

IGOs, and NGOs, this mechanism enables the creation<br />

of a “complementary, optional, parallel easing” to empower<br />

humankind and overcome the shortfalls in financing our future.<br />

The following equation demonstrates this as a formula:<br />

WE = LxROIxM<br />

y<br />

Key: WE: wealth effect generated by a parallel currency; L: additional<br />

liquidity created by the central bank; ROI: return on investment per<br />

project realized; M: Keynes’s demand multiplier; y: annual adjustment<br />

df: % of defaults of failed projects<br />

It should be noted that the wealth effects created by the<br />

mechanism above are potentially several times larger than<br />

the traditional Keynesian multiplier due to the different<br />

technology (blockchain), different channels, reduced negative<br />

externalities, reduced spillovers in the entropic sector, and the<br />

reduced negative impacts of the shadow economy. Accordingly,<br />

this mechanism would provide a more stable and resilient<br />

framework for the global economy as a whole. I think it is no<br />

overstatement to say that a complementary optional currency<br />

system would be Pareto superior to a monetary monopoly.<br />

5. Changing mindsets<br />

(df)<br />

Instead of thinking in a linear, serial, and sequential manner<br />

– which we do when we generate end-of-pipe strategies<br />

to distribute money in order to finance our future – we need<br />

to start thinking in parallel. Just as a bike needs two wheels,<br />

we need a currency system with two branches: a conventional<br />

and a complementary one, both designed for different purposes<br />

but intertwined. If there is one single variable with a<br />

great potential to change the world, it is a parallel monetary<br />

system. A parallel monetary system would be a game changer.<br />

Moreover, designing a parallel currency system would make<br />

our world more efficient and resilient at the same time, and<br />

it would definitely make the world a better place.<br />

<strong>Global</strong> <strong>Goals</strong> <strong>Yearbook</strong> <strong>2018</strong><br />

57

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!