16.05.2019 Views

DCN May Edition 2019

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

INDUSTRY OPINION<br />

Measures to control the brown<br />

marmorated stink bug<br />

A series of enhanced anti-stink bug measures are set to provide added challenges<br />

to industry, writes Andrew Crawford<br />

AS MANY READERS KNOW, THE<br />

response to the brown marmorated stink<br />

bug 2018-<strong>2019</strong> season by the Department<br />

of Agriculture and Water Resources<br />

exposed deficiencies in processes. Since the<br />

implementation of the BMSB emergency<br />

measures, FTA members witnessed a<br />

deterioration of service levels across the<br />

department, with key import services such<br />

as bookings and inspections most affected.<br />

A DEFICIENCY SUBMISSION<br />

Based on member feedback, FTA<br />

provided a submission to identify those<br />

deficiencies and provide a clear list of<br />

recommendations and considerations<br />

for the inspector-general of biosecurity.<br />

While many recommendations related<br />

to the department’s staffing levels,<br />

others sought to optimise and expand on<br />

existing initiatives, such as the Approved<br />

Arrangement scheme, the 19.2. Automatic<br />

Entry Processing for Commodities, Cargo<br />

Online Lodgement System and the Highly<br />

Compliant Importer Project. Strong, fair<br />

and consistent compliance is essential to<br />

underpin these systems and arrangements<br />

to allow industry an increased<br />

responsibility to manage biosecurity risks.<br />

STRONG COMPLIANCE RECORD<br />

FTA also advocated that increased<br />

responsibility should be given to those that<br />

have a strong compliance record. We now<br />

know that the upcoming <strong>2019</strong>-2020 season<br />

will be expanded to include more target risk<br />

countries. The list of countries includes the<br />

same as 2018/19, however another 23 have<br />

been added. The entire list is as follows:<br />

United States of America, Czech<br />

Republic, France, Canada, Georgia, Russia,<br />

Albania, Germany, Serbia, Andorra,<br />

Greece, Slovakia, Armenia, Hungary,<br />

Slovenia, Austria, Italy, Switzerland,<br />

Azerbaijan, Kosovo, Luxembourg,<br />

Belgium, Liechtenstein, Romania, Bosnia<br />

Andrew Crawford, head of border and<br />

biosecurity, Freight & Trade Alliance<br />

and Herzegovina, Macedonia, Spain,<br />

Bulgaria, Montenegro, Turkey, Croatia,<br />

The Netherlands, Japan (heightened vessel<br />

surveillance will be the measure applied).<br />

UPDATE ON BIOSECURITY LEVY<br />

It now has been confirmed that the start date of the<br />

contentious biosecurity levy has been delayed. In the recent<br />

Federal budget, it was announced that the implementation<br />

date of the biosecurity levy announced in last year’s budget has been changed<br />

from 1 July <strong>2019</strong> to 1 September <strong>2019</strong>. This delay is to allow the Industry Steering<br />

Committee (of which Paul Zalai, one of FTA’s directors, is a member) the opportunity<br />

to make recommendations to the minister. The quantum and method of collection<br />

of the biosecurity levy could well be impacted by a change of government.<br />

BACKGROUND<br />

The Biosecurity Import Levy was announced in the 2018 Federal Budget with the<br />

aim to collect $325m over three years from a start date of 1 July <strong>2019</strong>. Since that<br />

time there has been significant controversy surrounding the implementation of<br />

the levy, ultimately leading to the Department of Agriculture and Water Resources<br />

commissioning an independent review by Pegasus Economics. Its report was<br />

publicly released on Friday 29 March <strong>2019</strong>.<br />

FTA was privileged to be appointed by the minister to participate with eight other<br />

industry representatives in the committee led by an independent chair (David<br />

Trebeck) and supported by Pegasus Economics.<br />

FTA will continue to be heavily involved in discussions and planning and will<br />

provide readers with further updates as they emerge.<br />

MANDATORY OFFSHORE TREATMENT<br />

The other significant difference for next<br />

season could be the introduction of<br />

mandatory offshore treatment of target<br />

high risk goods shipped in sealed six-sided<br />

containers, as LCL (less than container<br />

load) and FAK (freight of all kinds). This<br />

was the department’s preferred position<br />

for 2018/19 and FTA and others advocated<br />

against this due to several commercial<br />

considerations. FTA will continue to work<br />

with the department on this.<br />

SAFEGUARDING ARRANGEMENTS<br />

The department is developing policies to<br />

allow for certain goods and supply chains<br />

to be recognised under safeguarding<br />

arrangements for the <strong>2019</strong>–20 season. A<br />

trial by invitation will be conducted of the<br />

arrangements. We expect more detailed<br />

information in the next few months.<br />

Ruth Swan; FTA<br />

16 <strong>May</strong> <strong>2019</strong><br />

thedcn.com.au

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!