16.05.2019 Views

DCN May Edition 2019

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

INDUSTRY OPINION<br />

Meeting the low<br />

sulphur fuel challenge<br />

Angela Gillham examines the trend towards cleaner fuels<br />

and what it is likely to mean in practice<br />

WHILE MOST TIGHTENING OF<br />

ship emissions standards has occurred<br />

in the northern hemisphere, as urban<br />

encroachment in Australia continues, so<br />

will community pressure on authorities to<br />

act here.<br />

It is worth comparing Australian fuel<br />

sulphur standards from other emissions<br />

compliance options will have an impact<br />

on demand for low sulphur fuel and will<br />

influence supply and price. It is important<br />

to note the IMO fuel availability study,<br />

commissioned in the lead up to the decision<br />

on the sulphur cap implementation date,<br />

found the global refining industry has<br />

capacity to meet projected global demand.<br />

sources. While there has been a tightening<br />

of global fuel standards and emissions<br />

regulations for international shipping, the<br />

current Australian requirement for sulphur<br />

content in automotive diesel remains<br />

considerably more stringent (Table 1).<br />

This is likely to attract further community<br />

attention in the future.<br />

LOW SULPHUR FUEL<br />

Fuel low enough in sulphur to be<br />

compliant, in reality, can mean different<br />

things. Lower sulphur content can be<br />

achieved by blending low sulphur fuels and<br />

heavy fuel oil or further refining HFO, to<br />

produce gasoil (diesel). Sulphur content is<br />

just one of many specifications and there<br />

IMPACT ON INDUSTRY<br />

Total annual marine fuel demand is around<br />

400m tonnes and climbing. The global<br />

sulphur cap will have a significant impact<br />

and as suppliers attempt to meet this new<br />

mix of marine fuel demand there will be a<br />

price increase, possibly a significant one.<br />

A recent survey of vessel operators by<br />

MIAL found average expectation of the cost<br />

differential between HSFO and compliant<br />

fuel was $250, and estimates ranged from<br />

$75 to $740 per tonne.<br />

There are several compliance options<br />

available to shipowners, including using<br />

low sulphur fuel, alternative fuels such as<br />

liquefied natural gas and ‘drop in’ biofuels<br />

and renewable diesel, and exhaust gas<br />

cleaning systems – each having technical<br />

challenges, limitations and accessibility<br />

issues. The degree of uptake of each of these<br />

are some safety concerns around the use of<br />

blended fuels to achieve the 0.5% limit, the<br />

properties of these fuels and compatibility<br />

with existing marine diesel engines.<br />

Work is underway to update guidelines<br />

relating to the relevant ISO specifications<br />

to address the safety concerns using new<br />

fuel blends.<br />

In Australia, low sulphur diesel options<br />

are limited as is refining capacity. Along<br />

with some high sulphur heavy fuel oil and<br />

petrol, the major Australian fuel suppliers<br />

import one grade of diesel at 0.001%<br />

sulphur – this is automotive diesel – a<br />

costly option. Fuel suppliers have indicated<br />

they are planning to have low sulphur fuel<br />

oil available at selected Australian ports,<br />

but ship operators wanting access to this<br />

product need to communicate this early to<br />

ensure capacity.<br />

TABLE 1: FUEL SULPHUR LIMITS IN AUSTRALIA<br />

REGULATED LIMIT<br />

DIESEL USE % PPM<br />

Automotive diesel 0.001 10<br />

Current international shipping 3.5 35000<br />

2020 international shipping 0.5 5000<br />

2020 international shipping ECA 0.1 1000<br />

Angela Gillham, deputy CEO, Maritime Industry<br />

Australia<br />

LNG<br />

LNG contains virtually no sulphur and, in<br />

recognition of the opportunities that LNG<br />

represents particularly for Australia, the<br />

number of newbuilds planned or operating<br />

within the Australian market is growing.<br />

Perceived limitations are loss of cargo<br />

space due to the larger fuel storage area and<br />

current lack of distribution networks and<br />

bunkering infrastructure.<br />

LNG has the added benefit of burning<br />

with about two thirds of the greenhouse<br />

gas emissions of diesel. LNG is a powerful<br />

greenhouse gas, however, and methane<br />

slippage has been flagged as an issue.<br />

BIOFUELS AND RENEWABLE DIESEL<br />

The use of biofuels and renewable diesel<br />

presents a significant opportunity with<br />

little to no sulphur content. There are a<br />

variety of drop-in biofuels and renewable<br />

diesel products available that can be used<br />

in existing marine diesel engines. The main<br />

challenge for wide-scale adoption of these<br />

fuels is the scalability of production to<br />

meet the large volumes required.<br />

MIAL<br />

18 <strong>May</strong> <strong>2019</strong><br />

thedcn.com.au

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!